Search
Cookie Usage Statistics Colour Key Sudden Death Monthly Poll Caption Comp eMail Author Shops
Ships Fleets Weaponry Species People Timelines Calculators Photo Galleries
Stations Design Lineage Size Charts Battles Science / Tech Temporal Styling Maps / Politics
Articles Reviews Lists Recreation Search Site Guide What's New Forum
Big bangs Borg species Cast Directors I'm a doctor not a Food and Drink Holoprogs Illnesses Little bangs Moments Morals Nebulae Planets Quotes Recreation Regulations Rules of aquisition Science and technology Ship Classes Ship Names Species Stations Station Names Stunt performers Wars Weapons Writers YATIs

Games

Reviewer : lowlymarine
Ave Rating : 0.0000 for 1 reviews
Title : Star Trek: New Worlds Rating : 0
Platforms : Windows Year : 2000
Review : I hate to be a voice of decent, but I'm shocked to read these overwhelmingly positive reviews of this game. It is hands down one of the worst Real-time Strategy games of our time. To compare it to Command and Conquer is an insult to that franchise, almost as much as to call it a real-time strategy game is an insult to the genre in general. The controls are nigh-impossible, the graphics are bland (yes, even for the time), the storyline is underdeveloped, and the gameplay, the most important part of any game, is atrocious. Units are slow and construct even slower, and to make matters worse, the maps are huge and there's fast way to scout. Plus there's no skirmish/custom mode of any kind, and no one ever played this online, so once you're done with the (largely slow and dull) campaign, that's it! I can attest that it at least works on XP home, however. For what little that's worth. Gamespot's review said it pretty well: "Star Trek: New Worlds promises to let you 'witness colony life at the most fundamental level,' but if that's true, then colony life isn't very exciting."

© Graham & Ian Kennedy Page views : 3,146 Last updated : 22 Sep 2024