Search
Cookie Usage Statistics Colour Key Sudden Death Monthly Poll Caption Comp eMail Author Shops
Ships Fleets Weaponry Species People Timelines Calculators Photo Galleries
Stations Design Lineage Size Charts Battles Science / Tech Temporal Styling Maps / Politics
Articles Reviews Lists Recreation Search Site Guide What's New Forum
8472 Andorians Armus Ba'ku Bajorans Benzites Beta Annari Betazoids Bolians Borg Breen Bunnicorn Bynars Cardassians Cheronians Crystalline entity Demons Denobulans Douwd Edo El-Aurians Ferengi Founders Gomtuu Gorn Hierarchy Hirogen Horta Humans Hunters J'Naii Jem'Hadar Karemma Kataanians Kazon Kelvans Klingons Kobali Kriosians Ktarians Kzinti Lurians Malon Morg / Eymorg Na'kuhl Nagilum Nanites Nausicaans Ocampa Organians Orions Pah-wraiths Pakled Parasites Progenitors Prophets Q Remans Risans Romulans Scalosians Sheliak Sikarians Son'a Sphere Builders Spittlebug Suliban Talaxians Talosians Tamarians Tarchannen parasites Tellarites The Cloud Tholians Tosk Tribbles Trill Vaadwaur Vidiians Vissians Vorta Voth Vulcans Xahean Xindi Aquatics Xindi Arboreals Xindi Avians Xindi Insectoids Xindi Primates Xindi Reptilians Yridians Zalkonians Additional Species

Episode Guest Reviews

Reviewer : Romanul
Ave Rating : 3.0000 for 2 reviews
Title : Star Trek Into Darkness Rating : 3
Writers : Alex Kurtzman, Damon Lindelof, Roberto Orci Year : 2259
Review : An average SF movie and a poor ST movie. Why a poor ST movie? Because it seems to disrespect much of what ST is (for good or bad). Why an SF average movie? The action is good, the special effects are great but the whole story is really hard to believe( yes, even for a SF movie). A 20 some year old immature youth leading the greatest ship in the federation despite breaking all the rules? THe chief engineer (Checov) is only 17 years old. It's like the whole ship is run by kids and it makes it so hard to take the universe seriously. At times you get the feeling it's a parody. It's a shame really. On the bright side, I am so happy that this is a BO hit. It means ST is not going to die(yet) and maybe, just maybe we will get a movie/ TV show with the old school ST. I can dream, right?!
Title : Star Trek Rating : 3
Writers : Alex Kurtzman, Roberto Orci Year : 2258
Review : An average SF movie and a poor ST movie. Why a poor ST movie? Because it seems to disrespect much of what ST is (for good or bad). Why an SF average movie? The action is good, the special effects are great but the whole story is really hard to believe( yes, even for a SF movie). A 20 some year old immature youth leading the greatest ship in the federation despite breaking all the rules? THe chief engineer (Checov) is only 17 years old. It's like the whole ship is run by kids and it makes it so hard to take the universe seriously. At times you get the feeling it's a parody. It's a shame really. On the bright side, I am so happy that this is a BO hit. It means ST is not going to die(yet) and maybe, just maybe we will get a movie/ TV show with the old school ST. I can dream, right?!

© Graham & Ian Kennedy Page views : 6,555 Last updated : 16 Jun 2024