Search
Cookie Usage Statistics Colour Key Sudden Death Monthly Poll Caption Comp eMail Author Shops
Ships Fleets Weaponry Species People Timelines Calculators Photo Galleries
Stations Design Lineage Size Charts Battles Science / Tech Temporal Styling Maps / Politics
Articles Reviews Lists Recreation Search Site Guide What's New Forum
Introduction A Matter of Time All Good Things All Our Yesterdays Assignment : Earth Captain's Holiday Carpenter Street Cause and Effect Children of Time E Squared Endgame Eye of the Needle First Contact Fury Future Tense Future's End Generations Little Green Men Parallax Past Tense Relativity Shockwave Storm Front The Edge of Forever The Visitor The Voyage Home Time And Again Time Squared Time's Orphan Timeless Times Arrow Tomorrow is Yesterday Trials and Tribble-ations Twilight Visionary We'll Always Have Paris Year of Hell Yesterday's Enterprise

Episode Guest Reviews

Reviewer : Romanul
Ave Rating : 3.0000 for 2 reviews
Title : Star Trek Into Darkness Rating : 3
Writers : Alex Kurtzman, Damon Lindelof, Roberto Orci Year : 2259
Review : An average SF movie and a poor ST movie. Why a poor ST movie? Because it seems to disrespect much of what ST is (for good or bad). Why an SF average movie? The action is good, the special effects are great but the whole story is really hard to believe( yes, even for a SF movie). A 20 some year old immature youth leading the greatest ship in the federation despite breaking all the rules? THe chief engineer (Checov) is only 17 years old. It's like the whole ship is run by kids and it makes it so hard to take the universe seriously. At times you get the feeling it's a parody. It's a shame really. On the bright side, I am so happy that this is a BO hit. It means ST is not going to die(yet) and maybe, just maybe we will get a movie/ TV show with the old school ST. I can dream, right?!
Title : Star Trek Rating : 3
Writers : Alex Kurtzman, Roberto Orci Year : 2258
Review : An average SF movie and a poor ST movie. Why a poor ST movie? Because it seems to disrespect much of what ST is (for good or bad). Why an SF average movie? The action is good, the special effects are great but the whole story is really hard to believe( yes, even for a SF movie). A 20 some year old immature youth leading the greatest ship in the federation despite breaking all the rules? THe chief engineer (Checov) is only 17 years old. It's like the whole ship is run by kids and it makes it so hard to take the universe seriously. At times you get the feeling it's a parody. It's a shame really. On the bright side, I am so happy that this is a BO hit. It means ST is not going to die(yet) and maybe, just maybe we will get a movie/ TV show with the old school ST. I can dream, right?!

© Graham & Ian Kennedy Page views : 6,567 Last updated : 20 Jun 2024