SFDebris: Field of Fire

Deep Space Nine
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

SFDebris: Field of Fire

Post by Captain Seafort »

Blip

So, any guesses how many posts this is going to stay on-topic for? :lol:
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: SFDebris: Field of Fire

Post by Tsukiyumi »

:lol:
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: SFDebris: Field of Fire

Post by Mikey »

Apparently, "zero."
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Nickswitz
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 5:34 pm
Location: Home
Contact:

Re: SFDebris: Field of Fire

Post by Nickswitz »

To be fair, it's topic was really, how long before it goes off topic? So it's really still on topic... :poke:
The world ended

"Insanity -- a perfectly rational adjustment to an insane world" - R.D.Lang
Giuseppe
Chief petty officer
Chief petty officer
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 9:27 pm

Re: SFDebris: Field of Fire

Post by Giuseppe »

I'd love a cheese pie right now. There... *fixed it*.
Tyyr
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10654
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh

Re: SFDebris: Field of Fire

Post by Tyyr »

You've got a highly effective weapon that could conceivably allow a defensive force to huddle in their walls and never expose themselves in any way yet still lay waste to their attackers like no one's business... so obviously Starfleet tosses it out.

Never really cared for this episode, then again it Ezri centric.
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: SFDebris: Field of Fire

Post by Captain Seafort »

Tyyr wrote:You've got a highly effective weapon that could conceivably allow a defensive force to huddle in their walls and never expose themselves in any way yet still lay waste to their attackers like no one's business... so obviously Starfleet tosses it out.
I doubt it would ever be highly effective infantry weapon compared with the FC phaser rifles - too big, too complicated, too small a magazine capacity, and the integrated transporter would probably be even more vulnerable to interference/jamming than the usual types. As a weapon developed specifically for assassinations, on the other hand, it would be very good indeed. I bet Section 31 loved it.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: SFDebris: Field of Fire

Post by Mikey »

Indeed - did we ever even see it capable of semi-automatic, much less automatic, fire? Great sniper rifle, not so much a battle rifle.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Tyyr
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10654
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh

Re: SFDebris: Field of Fire

Post by Tyyr »

I'm not entirely sure about that. You're talking about a weapon that would let you stand on one side of a 2 meter thick chunk of tritanium and shoot through it to the other side. You don't have to duck, hide, take a quick look, pop off a burst and pray you get back in cover before you get dead. Instead you and the rest of your squad stand there in perfect cover and just execute the people attacking you. The only real defense against it would be a transporter jammer.

It's not perfect but compared to their regular phasers it would be a significant improvement a lot of the time.
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: SFDebris: Field of Fire

Post by Captain Seafort »

Tyyr wrote:You're talking about a weapon that would let you stand on one side of a 2 meter thick chunk of tritanium...The only real defense against it would be a transporter jammer.
You're assuming that said chuck of tritanium wouldn't be an effective block itself. Even starship transporters can be jammed by everything from EM fields to funny rock, and the micro-transporter built into the weapon would inevitably be far weaker and more susceptible to jamming. I can't see any weapon reliant on transporters to operate to be anywhere near reliable enough to be a standard-issue infantry weapon.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Tyyr
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10654
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh

Re: SFDebris: Field of Fire

Post by Tyyr »

I'm not assuming the thing be standard issue, and I'd hope the people designing the fortification are smart enough to not make it out of something your primary weapon can't shoot through.
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: SFDebris: Field of Fire

Post by Captain Seafort »

Tyyr wrote:I'm not assuming the thing be standard issue
If it's being used routinely on the battlefield I'd consider it standard issue, be it as assault rifle or sniper rifle.
I'd hope the people designing the fortification are smart enough to not make it out of something your primary weapon can't shoot through.
It was an example, although given that this is Starfleet, what are the odds? They've been known to surround the computer cores of science vessels with transporter-proof materials.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: SFDebris: Field of Fire

Post by Deepcrush »

First off... this episode hurt my head. The level of stupidity just flowed like a raging river out of it, I can put up with Transformers, I can put up with Lord of the Rings (Films), but this just broke my naturally forgiving temper.

As to the weapon. Nice for an assassin in a pre-plotted area/target. But when it comes to sniping I'd much rather a M1903.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6256
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: SFDebris: Field of Fire

Post by McAvoy »

I don't remember the episode exactly and haven't watch the review yet. Was the rifle originally equiped with the trnasporter device?

I agree it would make for an excellent spiner weapon but not a soldier proof battle weapon. But why not go the next step and start creating grenade launchers with that transporter device?
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: SFDebris: Field of Fire

Post by Mikey »

IIRC, the microtransporter was a later addition.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Post Reply