Page 2 of 3

Re: Klingon possession of the Narada

Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:46 pm
by Nickswitz
Rochey wrote:Even a Death Star would be insanely easy to hide in the depths of space. Thing is, most people only travel to certain parts of space. Stars, planets, nebulae, etc. Stick the Narada out in the middle of empty space and no one will ever find it.
Yeah, only problem... Then your stuck in the middle of nowhere.

Re: Klingon possession of the Narada

Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 10:12 am
by Deepcrush
Rochey wrote:Even a Death Star would be insanely easy to hide in the depths of space. Thing is, most people only travel to certain parts of space. Stars, planets, nebulae, etc. Stick the Narada out in the middle of empty space and no one will ever find it.
Remember the trouble the Rebel's went through to find the Death Star in SWVI. The Dominion launched a sneak attack against Betazed with a small fleet. The Breen attacked Sol with a surprise fleet. It seems easy enough to hide anything you want in space, even with advanced tech.

Re: Klingon possession of the Narada

Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 10:33 am
by Teaos
Was the Dominion fleet that took Betazed small? I just thought it was unexpected.

Re: Klingon possession of the Narada

Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 10:34 am
by Deepcrush
Well, I doubt it would have to a large one. A lot of the war was spent in the areas between Bajor and Cardassia Prime.

Re: Klingon possession of the Narada

Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:03 am
by Atekimogus
Considering Lwaxana Troi the fleet might not have been as small as you think it were :twisted: !

Also, didn't the XY fleet screw up and were out of reach even if they should have been? Don't remember the exact lines anymore.

Re: Klingon possession of the Narada

Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 12:00 pm
by Deepcrush
Atekimogus wrote:Considering Lwaxana Troi the fleet might not have been as small as you think it were !
All the more reason for the UFP to let the Dominion have it. Let them deal with her for a while.
Atekimogus wrote:Also, didn't the XY fleet screw up and were out of reach even if they should have been? Don't remember the exact lines anymore.
Yes, there was a fleet that was caught out of position and were forced to retreat rather then stay and be butchered.

Re: Klingon possession of the Narada

Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 1:32 pm
by Sionnach Glic
Nickswitz wrote:
Rochey wrote:Even a Death Star would be insanely easy to hide in the depths of space. Thing is, most people only travel to certain parts of space. Stars, planets, nebulae, etc. Stick the Narada out in the middle of empty space and no one will ever find it.
Yeah, only problem... Then your stuck in the middle of nowhere.
Correct. But their entire plan was to go into hiding. Thus being stuck in the middle of nowhere works brilliantly.

Re: Klingon possession of the Narada

Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 10:38 pm
by Atekimogus
Deepcrush wrote:
Atekimogus wrote:Considering Lwaxana Troi the fleet might not have been as small as you think it were !
All the more reason for the UFP to let the Dominion have it. Let them deal with her for a while.
The last thing I would want to do is throwing around with anfounded conspiracy-theories but I think I heard or read somewhere that delivering her into the hands of the dominion was Section' 31 master plan all along with the unreliable founder-illness only a measly backup-plan. :twisted:

Re: Klingon possession of the Narada

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 7:57 am
by Vic
Lwaxana Troi is a weapon of mass destruction. :laughroll:

Re: Klingon possession of the Narada

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 8:51 am
by Deepcrush
So are those boobs she carried with her... Is it me or did those things change size every time we saw her?

Re: Klingon possession of the Narada

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 1:41 pm
by Tyyr
I tried not to look at her if at all possible.

Re: Klingon possession of the Narada

Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 5:21 pm
by Atekimogus
Well, you may remember that she once took a mud-bath with Alexander and look what a brave example of the proud klingon warrior race he turned out to be :twisted: . She is evil and dangerous imho:)

Re: Klingon possession of the Narada

Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 6:59 pm
by dagadget
Rochey wrote:Even a Death Star would be insanely easy to hide in the depths of space. Thing is, most people only travel to certain parts of space. Stars, planets, nebulae, etc. Stick the Narada out in the middle of empty space and no one will ever find it.


Good point powered down and in deep space the Narada damaged as she had to be by the Kelvin Collision would pass as just some space junk. If the Klingons had the Narada for any length of time they probably could have figured some of the stuff out.....

Re: Klingon possession of the Narada

Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 11:55 pm
by Foxfyre
Atekimogus wrote:Well, you may remember that she once took a mud-bath with Alexander and look what a brave example of the proud klingon warrior race he turned out to be :twisted: . She is evil and dangerous imho:)
I'm surprised the dominion kept betazed with her running around........ They prob went through at elast a hundered vorta due to self termination.

Re: Klingon possession of the Narada

Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 11:59 pm
by Tsukiyumi
USS Aeon wrote:I'm surprised the dominion kept betazed with her running around........ They prob went through at elast a hundered vorta due to self termination.
In my head, I just pictured Weyoun snapping his own neck. :lol: