Star Trek Theme Park.

McAvoy · Post by **McAvoy** » Fri Aug 05, 2011 4:24 pm

Still would need to build an exceptionally strong structural system for the ship.

shran · Post by **shran** » Fri Aug 05, 2011 4:52 pm

Indeed, as the main source of strain wouldn't come from underneath In Universe, but from the impulse engines. Not to mention the lack of a structural integrity field in real life.

McAvoy · Post by **McAvoy** » Fri Aug 05, 2011 5:20 pm

Well I was talking about building a replica ship in real life even if does nothing but sit there.

mwhittington · Post by **mwhittington** » Fri Aug 05, 2011 8:18 pm

Maybe Bill Gates and the King should collaborate together on this, as it would be exceptionally expensive.

LaughingCheese · Post by **LaughingCheese** » Sat Aug 13, 2011 11:15 pm

McAvoy wrote:Well I was talking about building a replica ship in real life even if does nothing but sit there.

Yes, as was I.

I still would rather build the Enterprise A if possible.

As to the structural issue, I don't know about the scale, but couldn't the bottom of the engineering hull be possibly big enough so that the curvature wouldn't matter as much?

[Obviously this would NOT be the Abramsverse Enterprise.

]

RK_Striker_JK_5 · Post by **RK_Striker_JK_5** » Sun Aug 14, 2011 12:22 am

I'd be happy building a Defiant and be done with it.

McAvoy · Post by **McAvoy** » Sun Aug 14, 2011 4:27 pm

I'd be more happy to buy a few f-14s from the US and use them as my personal jets. But that is just me.

Star Trek Theme Park.

Re: Star Trek Theme Park.

Re: Star Trek Theme Park.

Re: Star Trek Theme Park.

Re: Star Trek Theme Park.

Re: Star Trek Theme Park.

Re: Star Trek Theme Park.

Re: Star Trek Theme Park.