|Mobile Site||Shops||eMail Author||Caption Comp||Monthly Poll||Sudden Death||Colour Key||Statistics||Cookie Usage|
|Series :||The Next Generation||Rating :|
|Disc No :||2.1||Episode :||28|
|First Aired :||5 Dec 1988||Stardate :||42286.3|
|Director :||Robert Bowman||Year :||2365|
|Writers :||Brian Allen Lane||Season :||2|
|Guest Cast :||
|YATI :||Data claims that Holmes could only defeat Moriarty at the cost of his own life. Well I've read every Holmes story and novel written and this isn't true. I assume Data was referring to Holmes' apparent death on the Reichenbach falls, but in fact Holmes survived this and went on to live to a ripe old age.
This episode is one in a long running series that claim that holodeck matter cannot leave the grid. Yet Data walks off the holodeck holding a piece of paper that Moriarty gives him! And to recap, in "Angel One" Picard was hit by snow flying out of the holodeck, which them made a mess on the floor, and in "The Big Goodbye" Picard is kissed by a holographic woman, and walks out of the grid with her lipstick still on his face.
|Great Moment :||The scene in which Data solves his first real crime as Holmes.|
|Body Count :||One holodeck character is strangled.|
|Factoid :||It took a crew three days of round the clock work to build the Victorian London set at a cost of $125,000... and the whole thing was pulled down after two days of filming.|
Pulaski, sitting nearby, interjects that the problem is that as a machine Data cannot do anything truly creative; he can only solve puzzles when he already knkows the answer. When Geordi objects, she proposes a bet - they will create a mystery based on the Holmes stories and see if Data can solve it.
They return to the holodeck - and again, data solves the puzzle instantly. Pulaski once again objects, this time because the computer merely assembled a mystery by compiling parts of different Holmes stories, all of which Data knows. Geordi asks the computer to create an entirely new mystery in the Holmsian style, featuring an opponent capable of defeating Data. The computer complies, and the three begin their investigation - unaware that a nearby hologram is watching them use the arch controls, aware of what they are doing.
This time there is a real mystery to solve - one which becomes more complex when Pulaski is kidnapped by Professor Moriarty, the earlier bystander. Moriarty is determined to know more about the mysterious arch he saw, and although Pulaski refuses his demands he is able to call up the arch himself and gradually begins to learn how to work the ship's computer. When Data finds his lair, Moriarty shocks him by showing him a drawing he has made of the Enterprise-D. Data and Geordi report to Picard, and Geordi realises that he inadvertantly asked the computer to provide an opponent capable of defeating Data, not Holmes.
With Moriarty gaining control over the ship's computer system, Picard goes to the holodeck personally to meet with Moriarty. The hologram insists he is self aware and sentient, and demands that he be allowed to live out some sort of life. Picard explains that it is impossible for Moriarty to leave the holodeck, which he reluctantly accepts. After Pulaski is freed Picard makes the Professor an offer - he will save the program, and Federation scientists will work on a method of letting him leave the holodeck. In this way, Moriarty might one day gain his freedom. Moriarty agrees, and the program is duly saved.
Beyond that, there are some nice touches. Pulaski's questioning of Data's status is interesting; the writers are clearly going for a McCoy/Spock vibe here, putting the two at odds and no doubt planning that they would eventually become mutual friends. The dynamics would be a little different here, since Data wouldn't provide any hostility back to Pulaski or respond to her barbs at all, but this could potentially have worked, I suppose. Only it never really did. Pulaski is the kind of "grumpy doctor" figure that McCoy was, but somehow it just never really works for her the way it did for McCoy. Nothing I can put my finger on, really, she just comes across as being a bit more arrogant, a bit less compassionate than McCoy was. And her jibes at Data just don't really work all that well. Perhaps because she's questioning his ability to solve problems in creative ways... but Data solves problems in creative ways every day. So Pulaski comes across as a bit of a fool to be questioning it. The thing about McCoy's jibes against Spock is that we all knew deep down that McCoy was right - Spock did have emotions, and they are valuable things. Pulaski is passionately arguing, but on the wrong side.
|Copyright Graham Kennedy||Page views : 28,238||Last updated : 20 Jan 2015|