I'm not the only one who had this thought on seeing that poster am I?Graham Kennedy wrote:New poster
Colourful!
![Image](http://static.srcdn.com/slir/w723-h937-q90-c723:937/wp-content/uploads/star-wars-force-awakens-rey.jpg)
![Image](http://www.eonline.com/eol_images/Entire_Site/2015918/rs_634x939-151018105521-634-star-wars-the-force-awakens-new-poster-101815.jpg)
I'm not the only one who had this thought on seeing that poster am I?Graham Kennedy wrote:New poster
Colourful!
I didn't recall that. OK, then.Graham Kennedy wrote:About the only thing I can think of is that Sulu was as ga-ga over Mudd's Women as anybody else. Which would be unexpected, if he was gay.
Plus Demora.Graham Kennedy wrote:About the only thing I can think of is that Sulu was as ga-ga over Mudd's Women as anybody else. Which would be unexpected, if he was gay.
How so?Captain Seafort wrote:Plus Demora.Graham Kennedy wrote:About the only thing I can think of is that Sulu was as ga-ga over Mudd's Women as anybody else. Which would be unexpected, if he was gay.
Even today, that really doesn't hold true - something like a quarter of all gay couples have kids.Captain Seafort wrote:Because having a child, while not definitive, at least implies that the individual in question was not gay.
Hence why I said it wasn't definitive.Graham Kennedy wrote:Even today, that really doesn't hold true - something like a quarter of all gay couples have kids.
But in the 23rd century we have no idea what the statistics are. Most likely, gays would be equally likely to have and raise children compared to straights - simply going on the assumption of a society that is on all levels equally accepting and supportive of gays compared to straights and the desire for family being a basic human drive.
The thing that came to mind was the girls with very similar staff weapons and to an extent poses.Mikey wrote:TBH, it reminded more of the 1979 TMP poster.