What if the Lakota-type had been approved for production?

Deep Space Nine
Post Reply
User avatar
SuperSaiyaMan12
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts: 760
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:41 pm
Location: Auburn
Contact:

What if the Lakota-type had been approved for production?

Post by SuperSaiyaMan12 »

How'd the Dominion War go if all Excelsior-class ships had been refitted, retrofitted, and built to the Lakota-type standard? Would it have been an easier war?
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: What if the Lakota-type had been approved for production?

Post by Mikey »

Of course it would. But the odds of being able to do that, plus still keep up production on enough other ships to maintain the war effort, plus repair/replace attrition, are virtually nil.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6256
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: What if the Lakota-type had been approved for production?

Post by McAvoy »

Well if they could. I could imagine the war would have taken a different path. Dominion going on the defensive a little earlier and maybe early losses Starfleet had wouldn't have been so bad.

I mean, the Lakota is as powerful as a Galaxy and considering how many Excelsiors we have seen, it would basically be like having a fleet of Galaxys.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
Aaron
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
Contact:

Re: What if the Lakota-type had been approved for production?

Post by Aaron »

Mikey wrote:Of course it would. But the odds of being able to do that, plus still keep up production on enough other ships to maintain the war effort, plus repair/replace attrition, are virtually nil.
Indeed, it'd actually hurt things. They need these ships on the front lines and pulling them back to refit (for an unknown amount of time) is cutting heavily into their combat power. Better to just crank out new ships.
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6256
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: What if the Lakota-type had been approved for production?

Post by McAvoy »

I agree. The Federation has never really shown to have an industrial base to produce more ships than there were being lost. Take for example the US Navy in WW2. They produced a total of 10 fast battleships, 2 large cruisers, a hundred escort carriers, 24 Essex class carriers, hundreds of destroyers, and still have enough to rebuild other ships. Nearly all the old and slow battleships the US Navy recieved large refits. The Enterprise CV-6 and the Saratoga as well. Those are just the big ships.

The only way I can see this is if the Lakota appeared a good four or five years before it did and Starfleet wasted no time in the refit. In addition that Starfleet built more docks and more manpower to accomplish this as well.

But assuming that some way they did do this, then yes a fleet of Lakotas would hurt the Dominion badly.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Re: What if the Lakota-type had been approved for production?

Post by Sionnach Glic »

Aye, far better to simply keep building newer ships than old, upgraded ones.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15368
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: What if the Lakota-type had been approved for production?

Post by Teaos »

Agreed, a pointless decision. Build newer better.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: What if the Lakota-type had been approved for production?

Post by Deepcrush »

With as much as I love the Excelsior, its just not worth it. There was only a single point it the war that the refit would have made sense and that was during the cease fire. That lasted for several months and would have been perfect for the Excelsior crews to make the refits on their own. However, as had been said. When combat is on going you need every ship you can get on the front lines to the front lines.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: What if the Lakota-type had been approved for production?

Post by Captain Seafort »

McAvoy wrote:I agree. The Federation has never really shown to have an industrial base to produce more ships than there were being lost.
Indeed, they expected to take a year to get the fleet back up to strength, and that was only forty ships over and above normal wastage.
Nearly all the old and slow battleships the US Navy recieved large refits. The Enterprise CV-6 and the Saratoga as well.
I've never seen anything about either the Big E or the Sara being refitted, other than to repair damage. Certainly nothing on the scale of the Californias, for example.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
User avatar
SuperSaiyaMan12
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts: 760
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:41 pm
Location: Auburn
Contact:

Re: What if the Lakota-type had been approved for production?

Post by SuperSaiyaMan12 »

Captain Seafort wrote:I've never seen anything about either the Big E or the Sara being refitted, other than to repair damage. Certainly nothing on the scale of the Californias, for example.
In 1943, the Big E got a MAJOR refit. Old anti-air guns replaced with the new Bofors, more Five Inchers added, and of course new planes like the F6F Hellcat, F4U Corsair, TBF Avenger, and SBSC Helldiver.
User avatar
Reliant121
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 12263
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm

Re: What if the Lakota-type had been approved for production?

Post by Reliant121 »

Planes are relatively trivial to put on really. The guns are more difficult, but what we are talking about isnt a retrofit of fighters or weapons. It's an entire structural refit. If you have the original Excelsior subtype, refitting it to a Lakota (with the built up deflector, different nacelles etc.) it would have taken masses of time.
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: What if the Lakota-type had been approved for production?

Post by Captain Seafort »

SuperSaiyaMan12 wrote:In 1943, the Big E got a MAJOR refit. Old anti-air guns replaced with the new Bofors, more Five Inchers added, and of course new planes like the F6F Hellcat, F4U Corsair, TBF Avenger, and SBSC Helldiver.
Having a few extra guns added and taking on some new aircraft does not constitute a major refit. Having everything above the main armoured deck except the turrets completely rebuilt does.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: What if the Lakota-type had been approved for production?

Post by Captain Seafort »

Reliant121 wrote:Planes are relatively trivial to put on really. The guns are more difficult, but what we are talking about isnt a retrofit of fighters or weapons. It's an entire structural refit. If you have the original Excelsior subtype, refitting it to a Lakota (with the built up deflector, different nacelles etc.) it would have taken masses of time.
It would have been a major rebuild, but not for the reasons you suggest. The Lakota could have been an E-B subtype to start with. what would have taken time would have been gutting the ship and then rebuilding her for the new torp launchers and power feeds for the phasers.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
User avatar
Reliant121
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 12263
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm

Re: What if the Lakota-type had been approved for production?

Post by Reliant121 »

Were all of the Excelsiors updated to the Ent-B type? I thought there was an Excelsior in the series somewhere that was still the original subtype, although i may be wrong.
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: What if the Lakota-type had been approved for production?

Post by Captain Seafort »

Reliant121 wrote:Were all of the Excelsiors updated to the Ent-B type? I thought there was an Excelsior in the series somewhere that was still the original subtype, although i may be wrong.
The only E-B subtypes we've ever seen are the E-B herself and the Lakota. I'm simply pointing out that we can't assume her original hull was that of a bog-standard Ex.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Post Reply