Ship of the Week: The Death Star
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Ship of the Week: The Death Star
It's been a while since we've had one of these, so...
160km across for the first one, 900km for the second
24,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 megatons per shot.
The ultimate Big Fucking Gun.
Discuss.
160km across for the first one, 900km for the second
24,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 megatons per shot.
The ultimate Big Fucking Gun.
Discuss.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Ship of the Week: The Death Star
I still say the Planet Killer has more style.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
Re: Ship of the Week: The Death Star
What can you really say about the Death Star, aside from IT ROCKS. The only thing I would have added were some mid-range anti capatil ship guns. That way, the main weapon isn't restricted to "one shot-one kill" like in RotJ
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Ship of the Week: The Death Star
Pfft. That glorified earthworm? Besides, what did we see it do, hmm? It barely singled the E-nil.Rochey wrote:I still say the Planet Killer has more style.
This is style.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Ship of the Week: The Death Star
The DSI did have millions of anti-ship guns all over it, hence why they attacked with fighters only.
The DS2 was planned to have millions of such guns as well, but I don't think they were built by then (they probably foccused on getting the superlaser operational).
The DS2 was planned to have millions of such guns as well, but I don't think they were built by then (they probably foccused on getting the superlaser operational).
I was talking about Warmaster Abaddon's Planet Killer. I'll try find that cool bit of artwork with it blasting Savaven apart.Pfft. That glorified earthworm? Besides, what did we see it do, hmm? It barely singled the E-nil.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 21747
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
- Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
- Contact:
Re: Ship of the Week: The Death Star
Didn't Palpatine say the DSII was "fully operational"? Maybe he was just exaggerating.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Ship of the Week: The Death Star
Given that it was only half finished, I'd say he was either exaggerating a tad, or he was referring specifically to the superlaser, which was working fine.Tsukiyumi wrote:Didn't Palpatine say the DSII was "fully operational"? Maybe he was just exaggerating.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 6026
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 2:11 am
- Location: Any ol' place here on Earth or in space. You pick the century and I'll pick the spot
Re: Ship of the Week: The Death Star
Or the half that was finished was fully operational.Captain Seafort wrote:Given that it was only half finished, I'd say he was either exaggerating a tad, or he was referring specifically to the superlaser, which was working fine.Tsukiyumi wrote:Didn't Palpatine say the DSII was "fully operational"? Maybe he was just exaggerating.
"All this has happened before --"
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
Re: Ship of the Week: The Death Star
Here's what I say about the Death Star. It had the stupidest design flaw ever! The first one got blown up by little fighter (lucky shot, but still, it shouldn't have been able to happen). And the second one got blown up by an outdated (and modded) freighter. And it is ugly.
That said, it is an amazing engineering feat.
That said, it is an amazing engineering feat.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 4042
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:58 am
- Location: Right here.
Re: Ship of the Week: The Death Star
Particularly since the first one, at least, clearly traveled interstellar distances. Something Han originally thought to be a moon due to its size could go to hyperspace, which we can presume to have been an impressive feat of engineering also (though of course the whole science behind it is fictional). How many years were there between ANH and ROTJ? It would seem that they were able to build the second Death Star pretty damned fast, considering that it would have been 900km across when completed!stitch626 wrote:Here's what I say about the Death Star. It had the stupidest design flaw ever! The first one got blown up by little fighter (lucky shot, but still, it shouldn't have been able to happen). And the second one got blown up by an outdated (and modded) freighter. And it is ugly.
That said, it is an amazing engineering feat.
"If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wonderous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross... but it's not for the timid." Q, Q Who
Re: Ship of the Week: The Death Star
So it was obviously designed by the same people who made the GCS.stitch626 wrote:Here's what I say about the Death Star. It had the stupidest design flaw ever! The first one got blown up by little fighter (lucky shot, but still, it shouldn't have been able to happen). And the second one got blown up by an outdated (and modded) freighter. And it is ugly.
"There was also a large horse in the room, taking up most of it."
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 4042
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:58 am
- Location: Right here.
Re: Ship of the Week: The Death Star
Be fair now: at least Luke had to shoot at the Death Star before it went boom!Lazar wrote:So it was obviously designed by the same people who made the GCS.stitch626 wrote:Here's what I say about the Death Star. It had the stupidest design flaw ever! The first one got blown up by little fighter (lucky shot, but still, it shouldn't have been able to happen). And the second one got blown up by an outdated (and modded) freighter. And it is ugly.
"If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wonderous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross... but it's not for the timid." Q, Q Who
Re: Ship of the Week: The Death Star
Of course, I'm still not sure why you needed a big hole as an exaust vent, as opposed to a bunch of tiny ones, OR if you ray shield the trench, why you wouldn't particle shield it as well.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Ship of the Week: The Death Star
Possibly one large hole was more efficient than a bunch of small ones, and too be fair it wasn't that big - there were expressions of disbelief when the size of the target was mentioned, and I believe Lucas has gone on record as saying the shot was impossible for anyone but Luke.Mark wrote:Of course, I'm still not sure why you needed a big hole as an exaust vent as opposed to a bunch of tiny ones
If it were particle-shielded, how exactly is is meant to disperse heat?OR if you ray shield the trench, why you wouldn't particle shield it as well.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
- Graham Kennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Banbury, UK
- Contact:
Re: Ship of the Week: The Death Star
Meh, never was impressed especially. It can blow up a planet, which seems a rather pointless exercise. Ignoring the pointless supergun and looking only at conventional armament, presumably it's got a lot of guns, but it's shape is the worst one possible in those terms - for one the field of fire of any gun is restricted to 50% of the sky at most. For another the sphere is the most efficient shape in terms of having the lowest surface area to volume ratio, but that also means it's the worst possible shape if want you want is the largest possible area to place guns on. Somebody said the first was 160 km across; a cube of equal volume would have a quarter again as much surface area, though it would still be limited in its fields of fire - slightly more so, actually.
In volume terms a 160 km Death Star has a volume of around 2,144,400 km^3, whilst a Star Destroyer has a volume of something like half a km^3. Even assuming build ease doesn't scale directly with volume one must surely assume that half a million or so SDs could be built for the cost of the original Death Star. That seems like a far more useful force.
Vulnerability to attack is hard to assess really since there's only been two types, each of different design. But no example of the type has survived combat with the enemy, ever. And every example of the type has been destroyed by damage to its reactor. People who deride the GCS for its fragile warp core should hate Death Stars with a passion. Given that the first one especially took something like 17 years to build at minimum, possibly a good deal longer, to have it destroyed the very first time it entered combat with an enemy is rather humiliating.
It's a nice enough plot device, though.
In volume terms a 160 km Death Star has a volume of around 2,144,400 km^3, whilst a Star Destroyer has a volume of something like half a km^3. Even assuming build ease doesn't scale directly with volume one must surely assume that half a million or so SDs could be built for the cost of the original Death Star. That seems like a far more useful force.
Vulnerability to attack is hard to assess really since there's only been two types, each of different design. But no example of the type has survived combat with the enemy, ever. And every example of the type has been destroyed by damage to its reactor. People who deride the GCS for its fragile warp core should hate Death Stars with a passion. Given that the first one especially took something like 17 years to build at minimum, possibly a good deal longer, to have it destroyed the very first time it entered combat with an enemy is rather humiliating.
It's a nice enough plot device, though.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...