'Breen' having 'Thots'

Post by **Captain Seafort** » Sat Sep 27, 2008 4:43 pm

Third post Nick. Third.

Nickswitz · Post by **Nickswitz** » Sat Sep 27, 2008 4:51 pm

I count after the original topic post. So according to me it would be second, but what does it really matter

Sionnach Glic · Post by **Sionnach Glic** » Sat Sep 27, 2008 5:24 pm

Still ain't as good as that time we went off-topic with the first reply.

Nickswitz · Post by **Nickswitz** » Sat Sep 27, 2008 5:33 pm

We're really good

Sionnach Glic · Post by **Sionnach Glic** » Sat Sep 27, 2008 5:53 pm

We've had a lot of practice. 8)

Deepcrush · Post by **Deepcrush** » Sun Sep 28, 2008 6:36 am

*Shoots Rochey in the back of the head*

Like target practice.

Post by **Mikey** » Mon Sep 29, 2008 5:27 pm

Teaos wrote: I know back in your day they still taught manners and stuff in school but that stuff went out of style in the 40's

The difference isn't about being "back in my day;" just that we don't have to cancel school for shearing season.

Sionnach Glic · Post by **Sionnach Glic** » Mon Sep 29, 2008 7:12 pm

Deepcrush · Post by **Deepcrush** » Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:50 pm

Oh snap yo!

Mark · Post by **Mark** » Tue Sep 30, 2008 1:04 am

Mikey wrote:
Teaos wrote: I know back in your day they still taught manners and stuff in school but that stuff went out of style in the 40's
The difference isn't about being "back in my day;" just that we don't have to cancel school for shearing season.

And pants were used to "conceal" butt cracks as opposed to "revealing" them.

Yes, I'm old like Mikey too. I remember George Custer when he was still a Lieutenant.

Sonic Glitch · Post by **Sonic Glitch** » Tue Sep 30, 2008 1:53 am

Mark wrote: I remember George Custer when he was still a Lieutenant.

Mark · Post by **Mark** » Tue Sep 30, 2008 2:04 am

When one enters their 3rd decade of life, one DOES have some stories

Granitehewer · Post by **Granitehewer** » Fri Oct 03, 2008 11:16 am

Teaos wrote:Ok I am slighty drunk right now but that post is f***ing impossible to read. Even I make more sense than that most time and I have the english skills of a retarded 5 year old.

That post is perfectly clear to read, the title is an acknowledged pun, and sans means without, so anyone here with a d or above at gcse english should be able to read it, and teaos you're intelligent and articulate, certainly not retarded or infantile,.

Post by **Mikey** » Fri Oct 03, 2008 3:10 pm

Hi Pete!

Post by **Captain Seafort** » Fri Oct 03, 2008 4:19 pm

Granitehewer wrote:That post is perfectly clear to read, the title is an acknowledged pun, and sans means without, so anyone here with a d or above at gcse english should be able to read it, and teaos you're intelligent and articulate, certainly not retarded or infantile,.

The post is a nigh-on incomprehensible wall of text. Paragraphs and capitalisation are your friends, so use them.

'Breen' having 'Thots'

Re: 'Breen' having 'Thots'

Re: 'Breen' having 'Thots'

Re: 'Breen' having 'Thots'

Re: 'Breen' having 'Thots'

Re: 'Breen' having 'Thots'

Re: 'Breen' having 'Thots'

Re: 'Breen' having 'Thots'

Re: 'Breen' having 'Thots'

Re: 'Breen' having 'Thots'

Re: 'Breen' having 'Thots'

Re: 'Breen' having 'Thots'

Re: 'Breen' having 'Thots'

Re: 'Breen' having 'Thots'

Re: 'Breen' having 'Thots'

Re: 'Breen' having 'Thots'