Our Ship - Torpedo Configuration

Which option?

Poll ended at Sun Aug 03, 2008 12:50 pm

1
2
14%
2
1
7%
3
2
14%
4
8
57%
5
0
No votes
6
1
7%
 
Total votes: 14
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Our Ship - Torpedo Configuration

Post by Mikey »

Not too familiar with that, but the Starfighter was nicknamed "the Widowmaker" by its own pilots.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Aaron
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
Contact:

Re: Our Ship - Torpedo Configuration

Post by Aaron »

Mikey wrote:Not too familiar with that, but the Starfighter was nicknamed "the Widowmaker" by its own pilots.
I know, yet the CF pliots managed to operate it for decades without the ridiculous losses that the Europeans sustained, even after it was converted to CAS.

Edit: A little something on the CF-100
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Our Ship - Torpedo Configuration

Post by Deepcrush »

Chakat has given a list of eps but only one pic of evidence that is more likely a error on part of the FX team then anything else.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Aaron
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
Contact:

Re: Our Ship - Torpedo Configuration

Post by Aaron »

Deepcrush wrote:Chakat has given a list of eps but only one pic of evidence that is more likely a error on part of the FX team then anything else.
I can think of a few more but it's his case to prove, not ours.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Our Ship - Torpedo Configuration

Post by Deepcrush »

True, but he has his right to theory. Chakat has shown why the theory is there, now just needs to apply cannon.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Blackstar the Chakat
Banned
Posts: 5594
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm

Re: Our Ship - Torpedo Configuration

Post by Blackstar the Chakat »

Cpl Kendall wrote:
Deepcrush wrote:We may have seen matters that look like a ship firing phasers at warp but as phasers move at the speed of light we should write it off as the same as the 60 meter defiant.
*shrug* I'm more than willing to do so, I would like Chakat to produce an actual list of episodes though.
huh...did the forums eat my posts or are do you need your prescription updated?
Blackstar the Chakat wrote:
Deepcrush wrote:Only when firing on a target that is not at warp. Phasers move at the speed of light. That is a bad thing when you are going faster then the speed of light. warheads are far better for combat when at warp speeds.
Actually we've seen phasers used at warp in multiple episodes. Voyager's Basics, Part 1 and again Message in a Bottle when the Prometheus wipes the floor with a Nebula-class ship. The Jem'Hadar use phasers at warp in "Valient". And this is just off the top of my head.
Blackstar the Chakat wrote:Image

Here's a picture of a runabout using phasers at warp in "Treachery, Faith, and the Great River"
Blackstar the Chakat wrote:
Deepcrush wrote:Message in a Bottle, didn't the prommie come out of warp to engage the Neb?

Never even saw any combat other then the attack on the Dominion Battleship in Valient, and that wasn't at warp.

TOS, carry with a grain of salt as the same effects were used for torps as phasers.

Still only one.
You forgot Basics pt 1. No the Prometheus did not drop out of warp. It switched to Multi-vector assault mode, manuvored to attack position and fired phasers.

In Valient Nog's runabout was attacked by a Jem'Hadar ship firing phasers.
So since I seem to be repeating myself lately lets do it one more time

Star Trek Voyager "Basics pt. 1"
Star Trek Voyager "Message in a bottle"
Star Trek DS9 "Trechery, Faith, and the Great River"
Star Trek DS9 "Valient"
Enterprise "Shockwave"
Enterprise "Future Tense"
TOS: "The Ultimate Computer"
TOS: "Elaan of Troyius"

so that's at least eight episodes.
Aaron
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
Contact:

Re: Our Ship - Torpedo Configuration

Post by Aaron »

Blackstar the Chakat wrote:
huh...did the forums eat my posts or are do you need your prescription updated?
Unfortunately there's no prescription for internet ignorance.
Blackstar the Chakat wrote:
So since I seem to be repeating myself lately lets do it one more time

Star Trek Voyager "Basics pt. 1"
Star Trek Voyager "Message in a bottle"
Star Trek DS9 "Trechery, Faith, and the Great River"
Star Trek DS9 "Valient"
Enterprise "Shockwave"
Enterprise "Future Tense"
TOS: "The Ultimate Computer"
TOS: "Elaan of Troyius"

so that's at least eight episodes.
Congrats, now you've figured out how to work MA. Lets see some screenshots and a comparison of how many warp phaser engaements there are compared to sublight engagements.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Our Ship - Torpedo Configuration

Post by Deepcrush »

No one is questioning your statements but you have to provide evidence. You've shown only one piece of said evidence. One photo can still be an error in FX. You have to show why we should treat it as cannon.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: Our Ship - Torpedo Configuration

Post by Tsukiyumi »

Blackstar is right; there are a number of times phasers and other beam weapons are used at warp, and phase cannons on ENT as well. It was one of the myriad things that pissed me off to see.

I don't have any Trek DVDs, so I can't provide screenshots.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
Blackstar the Chakat
Banned
Posts: 5594
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm

Re: Our Ship - Torpedo Configuration

Post by Blackstar the Chakat »

Deepcrush wrote:No one is questioning your statements but you have to provide evidence. You've shown only one piece of said evidence. One photo can still be an error in FX. You have to show why we should treat it as cannon.
Image

From basics part 1. This also seems to prove that Voyager can maintain warp with her nacelles down

Image

And from Message in a Bottle.

Oh, but I was mistaken about Valient. We never saw what weapons the Jem'Hadar were using.

So is this enough evidence to make you concede your point Deepcrush?
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: Our Ship - Torpedo Configuration

Post by Captain Seafort »

There's also a host of examples from TOS of warp-speed phaser firing.

The Corbomite Manoeuvre:
KIRK: Helm, give us warp speed.
SULU: Warp one, sir.
SPOCK: Radiation at the tolerance level.
SULU: Warp two, sir. Speed is now warp three.
SPOCK: Radiation passing the tolerance level, entering lethal zone.
BAILEY: Range fifty one metres and still closing, sir.
KIRK: Phaser Crew stand ready.
BAILEY: Phaser Crew reports ready, sir.
SPOCK: Growing. We can take only a few more seconds of this.
KIRK: Lock phasers on target. Mister Bailey, lock phasers.
BAILEY: Phasers locked on target, sir. At point-blank range and closing.
KIRK: Fire main phasers.

Captain's Log, star date 1514.0. The cube has been destroyed. Ship's damage minor but my next decision, major. Probe on ahead or turn back.


Obession:
SCOTT: Captain, we can't maintain warp eight speed much longer. Pressures are approaching the critical point.
KIRK: Range, Mister Chekov?
CHEKOV [OC]: Point zero four light years ahead. Our phasers won't reach it, sir.
Not a direct use, but no suggestion that phasers are inoperable.

The Ultimate Computer:
SULU: Speed increasing to warp three. Turning now to one one two mark five. Phasers locking on target, sir.
CHEKOV: Enemy vessel closing with us.
SULU: Main phasers firing. A hit, sir. Two more.
CHEKOV: Changing course to two eight mark four two.
(Pavel feels as fed up and useless as Kirk as the machine does his job for him.)
SULU: Phasers firing again.
CHEKOV: Turning to one one three mark five. Warp four speed.
SULU: Firing again.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: Our Ship - Torpedo Configuration

Post by Tsukiyumi »

Well, there we go. As was suggested, there are plenty of references, and visuals to prove that phasers can be used at warp.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
Blackstar the Chakat
Banned
Posts: 5594
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm

Re: Our Ship - Torpedo Configuration

Post by Blackstar the Chakat »

Yep, I spent all night trying to figure out how to get those screencaps. Turns out that if you're using Windows Media Player all you need to do is use ctrl + i and it'll take a screencap for you.
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: Our Ship - Torpedo Configuration

Post by Captain Seafort »

Tsukiyumi wrote:Well, there we go. As was suggested, there are plenty of references, and visuals to prove that phasers can be used at warp.
The real limitation doesn't appear to be the speed of the firing ship, but that of the target. I can't recall an instance of "warp strafing" - in all the cases we've been discussing both the firing ship and the target were travelling at warp, suggesting that relative speed has to be very low for phasers to be effective.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Aaron
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
Contact:

Re: Our Ship - Torpedo Configuration

Post by Aaron »

Captain Seafort wrote:
The real limitation doesn't appear to be the speed of the firing ship, but that of the target. I can't recall an instance of "warp strafing" - in all the cases we've been discussing both the firing ship and the target were travelling at warp, suggesting that relative speed has to be very low for phasers to be effective.
That's what I was trying to get at before, otherwise the Fed's could have gunned down Jemmie ships left and right.
Post Reply