Page 4 of 4
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 9:53 pm
by Bryan Moore
Mikey wrote:OK, here it is: the long-awaited, often-imitated, never-duplicated, (and probably much-debated) result tally:
Team Seafort: 193 pts.
Team Teaos: 185 pts.
This is considering the waiver of the penalty for a substitute post which Teaos graciously offered. Congratulations to both teams for an enjoyable and well-done debate, and for a very close score - which, BTW, was NOT done artificially. Feel free to post here or PM with any questions; I have individual scoring for each post available. Thanks again!
Can you post the scoring? I know mine was weak, but I'm certainly curious.
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 9:58 pm
by Captain Seafort
Bryan Moore wrote:Can you post the scoring?
Seconded. It would also be interesting to know the categories you used, and how you decided on points within those categories.
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 10:12 pm
by KuvahMagh
Agreed, the only way we can improve ourselves/the debate or fix things in the future is if we know everything.
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 11:58 pm
by Mikey
OK. Please bear in mine that this is MY first time too; I thjink a PM is probably more appropriate if you'd like my thoughts on any individual post.
Captain Seafort (1): use of logic - 25
use of evidence - 15
ability to counter - N/A (I used a median of 13 pts.)
rhetoric - 20
Teaos: logic - 20
evidence - 10
counter - 25
rhetoric - 15
KuvahMagh: logic - 10
evidence - 20
counter - 20
rhetoric - 10
Bryan Moore: logic - 15
evidence - 5
counter - 15
rhetoric - 15
Captain Seafort (for Monroe): logic - 15
evidence - 10
counter - 20
rhetoric - 15
Cpl Kendall: logic - 10
evidence - 20
counter - 25
rhetoric - 10
At 100 pts. available per post, I simply weighted each of the four categories (which I had previously specified) equally at 25 pts. available in each. Any suggestions toward amending/improving that method are welcome.
Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 3:34 am
by Teaos
Can you define the rhetotic catagory? I'm not sure what you mean by that.
A nice indepth judging Mikey. I'll have to work harder at rigging the debate next time...
Oh and Congratulation to Seaforts team on winning
Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 3:56 am
by Mikey
Teaos wrote:Can you define the rhetotic catagory? I'm not sure what you mean by that.
By that I mean how you express yourself and how clearly you rlanguage denotes your ideas.
A nice indepth judging Mikey. I'll have to work harder at rigging the debate next time...
