UCS Longfellow class Torpedo Ram

Graham's Coalition Universe stuff
Post Reply
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

UCS Longfellow class Torpedo Ram

Post by Graham Kennedy »

The Longfellow class are something of an oddity. The design brief was for a ship which was essentially a point defence vessel with some interstellar capability. In this respect the ship falls somewhere between an insystem defence craft and a true interstellar warship.

In combat, the Longfellow is essentially a system defence craft. It would patrol the area around a star, either at sublight speeds out to 50 AU or so, or at FTL speeds out to around 10 - 20,000 AU. It's role would be to try and get in close to an attacking force and use the two external torpedo launchers to try and get hits in on frigates, destroyers, or support craft.

Although technically capable of interstellar flight, at 5 kc the Longfellow lacks speed. It is fitted with only the most rudimentary habitation facilities; most missions last less than a day, and it would be hard pressed to support a crew for more than a couple of days. At maximum speed the fuel gives the ship an endurance of no more than three days, though in theory this can be extended at low speeds.

The Longfellow was intended as part of Project Arvind, an effort to extend and reinforce system defence fleets by replacing the usual sublight ships with short range FTL models. Many observers considered Arvind to be a vital part of the modernisation of the Coalition's military, but it was subject to a good deal of political infighting. By convention the Coalition Navy was equipped with FTL ships, while the system defences were comprised of STL ships. The Longfellow was seen as a threat to this status quo, and the Navy fought it tooth and nail.

Although the Navy was not ultimately able to cancel the Longfellow, the numbers were slashed back again and again during development. In the event only 200 units were produced before the end of the run; ironically the final reason given for halting production was rapidly rising costs - largely caused by having to spread the development cost among fewer and fewer hulls!

In service the Longfellow has proved to be a highly valuable addition to system defences in those systems which received it. It has mostly served in the Turgran Imperium.

Image
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Post by Graham Kennedy »

Sizecomp, with an old friend thrown in :) :

Image
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY
Contact:

Post by stitch626 »

The only complaint/suggestion I would give is add some hull textures.
Otherwise, wonderfull design. If the ST creators had put in as much thought as you have, there would be far less problems (ie defient and BOP size issues).
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Post by Mikey »

This is an odd one for me, GK. I'm used to seeing your designs pack as much as is feasible into a given spaceframe, but this (following your backstory, of course) seems to have had corners cut, and ended up with "just enough" ability to be effective. I am a bit confused by this bit:
most missions last less than a day, and it would be hard pressed to support a crew for more than a couple of days. At maximum speed the fuel gives the ship an endurance of no more than three days, though in theory this can be extended at low speeds.
Does this mean that the vessel is only launched when an incoming threat is perceived?
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Post by Graham Kennedy »

The idea of these ships is that they are basically never more than a few hours from base. A long mission would be to fly out for a few hours, patrol for six hours or so, then fly back. They won't just sit in dock all the time, but they don't conduct long range patrols lasting days or weeks, either.

Hull textures aren't really something I can easily do. I draw these ships by hand; they aren't rendered models or anything.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Post by Mikey »

OK. So the only accomodations they would need would be to house the crew while away from base only, yes?
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Post by Captain Seafort »

Cool. An MTB. :)

It's good to see this sort of fairly small, short-range, mass-produced ship getting a look in, among all the heavy battleships and cruisers.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Post by Graham Kennedy »

Mikey wrote:OK. So the only accomodations they would need would be to house the crew while away from base only, yes?
Yes. You're talking maybe kitchens and a mess area, toilets. No wash facilities, no bedrooms, very little in the way of food stocks.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
MetalHead
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 945
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 3:53 am
Location: Cheshire, UK
Contact:

Post by MetalHead »

hmmm. An interesting idea but once the torpedoes are expended this ship becomes pretty useless in battle, and with slow speeds it looks like your idea of getting in close to do damage is a dangerous one. She flies in as close as she can, dupes two torpedoes into the mix. Then what? One AMP cannon, about mark 2/3 i'd guess, and thats it? A sitting duck for fighters and anything in a bit heavier weight class, and not enough engine power to get out of the way quickly enough.

I do like the idea of such a "small" ship (for your universe, haha) carrying a large warhead payload, but two torps?? dosn't seem enough...
"Beware what you intend to say, those words will always make you pay." - Soilwork

Booze and Strippers!
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Post by Graham Kennedy »

The original idea of these was that you wouldn't face a few... you'd face a hundred, a thousand, because they are so small and cheap. Except they ended up being small but not cheap, and not numerous. It's essentially a failed design in that respect.

The inspiration for these is this, by the way : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pegasus_class_hydrofoil
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
MetalHead
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 945
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 3:53 am
Location: Cheshire, UK
Contact:

Post by MetalHead »

GrahamKennedy wrote:The original idea of these was that you wouldn't face a few... you'd face a hundred, a thousand, because they are so small and cheap. Except they ended up being small but not cheap, and not numerous. It's essentially a failed design in that respect.

The inspiration for these is this, by the way : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pegasus_class_hydrofoil
Lol, I see. I didn't latch on to that, but thanks for clearing it up. So im guessing that these gradually would be being phased out of service to be replaced by...heavy bombers and fighter escorts?
"Beware what you intend to say, those words will always make you pay." - Soilwork

Booze and Strippers!
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Post by Graham Kennedy »

I've toyed with bomber types for my universe, but I am not sure I like the concept. A lot of systems would have fighter units based in them for local defence.

The Coalition's system defences have tended to be pretty poor, historically. Their military philosophy emphasises taking a fight to the enemy - fight on his territory, not your own, when at all possible.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
Post Reply