Page 6 of 7

Re: Swinging nacelles?

Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 7:48 am
by Teaos
I doubt you could not notice something like that.

Re: Swinging nacelles?

Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 7:34 pm
by Mikey
Rochey wrote:Perhaps there's some sort of system to prevent one nacelle rising if the other doesn't?
Yes, that's it. An active safety system that somehow wouldn't be damaged by the thing that damaged the nacelle mechanism in the first place. [/sarcasm]

Re: Swinging nacelles?

Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 8:34 pm
by Sionnach Glic
Sorry, was I assuming competance on behalf of Starfleet again? :P

Re: Swinging nacelles?

Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 8:41 pm
by Nickswitz
Yeah Rochey i think you were
and thats just wrong :D

Re: Swinging nacelles?

Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:01 pm
by Sionnach Glic
Sorry, I'll make sure that doesn't happen again.

Re: Swinging nacelles?

Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:00 pm
by Mark
And so another Tribble dies :(

Re: Swinging nacelles?

Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:01 pm
by Captain Seafort
Good riddance to the furry pests.

Re: Swinging nacelles?

Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:02 pm
by Sionnach Glic
Hey, it's not like there ain't plenty more where that came from!

Re: Swinging nacelles?

Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 9:00 am
by Tiberius
My idea....

The nacells swing up when at warp, but are flat at impulse. The impulse engines are positioned on the swining parts of the pylons.

Maybe the impulse engines are at the correct position for impulse flight when the pylons are flat, but to get the warp nacelles to the correct position for warp flight, they need to be higher. So the nacelles have to swing up. This would make sure that the engines (warp or impulse as the need be) are in the correct position relative to the ship's mass.

Re: Swinging nacelles?

Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 12:29 pm
by Captain Seafort
It's needlessly convoluted and complex - you'd be much better off putting the impluse engines somewhere else (even on outriggers), and using fixed nacelles.

In other words, it's Voyager to a T. :)

Re: Swinging nacelles?

Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 12:52 pm
by Teaos
Since it is semi canon and sorta makes sense I like the "Warp pollution idea"

Re: Swinging nacelles?

Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 1:09 pm
by Sionnach Glic
But no other ship built around the same time as the Intrepid class has swinging nacelles.

I like the idea that they were some sort of experimental propulsion system, designed to give the ship greater efficiency.

Re: Swinging nacelles?

Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 1:12 pm
by Teaos
I'd guess they came up with another way of avoiding the pollution that didnt involve swinging nacelles.

Re: Swinging nacelles?

Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 1:15 pm
by Sionnach Glic
So they continued building the ship class with a completely pointless feature?

Re: Swinging nacelles?

Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 1:22 pm
by Teaos
Well it was already part of the design, so they had a choice of replacing the nacelles with what ever new thing they made to stop the pollution or keep building the swing arms.

The arms arent really a big deal so they could of just thought "Screw it, we'll keep the arms"

Also I don't believe we ever saw a Intrepid built after Voyager.