Page 5 of 8

Re: Our Ship - Shape

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 7:37 pm
by Reliant121
true.

Re: Our Ship - Shape

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 8:19 pm
by Grundig
I thought I was used to the section 31 effect, but, um, how did we come to anal sex when the prompt was a ship configuration? I guess a little innuendo never hurt anyone. Except maybe the bottom...

Re: Our Ship - Shape

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 8:35 pm
by Mikey
Perhaps we have a specific condition of TR-116 syndrome - maybe it's TR-69 disease?

Re: Our Ship - Shape

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 8:44 pm
by Reliant121
is there a way to make doggy style with numbers?

Re: Our Ship - Shape

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 8:46 pm
by Reliant121
69 is different. and is merely two blow jobs stuck together. Doggy style involves the holy grail of penetration.

Re: Our Ship - Shape

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 8:47 pm
by Reliant121
er....where did the post go?

Re: Our Ship - Shape

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 8:48 pm
by Mikey
Yeah, I re-read what you said and deleted my erroneous post.

I can't talk about this with a thirteen-year-old! I'm a DAD for crying out loud!

Re: Our Ship - Shape

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 8:51 pm
by Reliant121
And? indulge your curiousities :P


I AM NOT ATTEMPTING TO FLIRT WITH HIM.

i know what your perverse minds are like.

Re: Our Ship - Shape

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:22 pm
by Mark
Reliant121 wrote:And? indulge your curiousities :P


I AM NOT ATTEMPTING TO FLIRT WITH HIM.

i know what your perverse minds are like.
There is simply no way possible for you to quite know HOW perverse our minds our. We've had double and triple the time you have had to corrupt ourselves. :happydevil:

Re: Our Ship - Shape

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:50 pm
by Grundig
I meant tr-116 syndrome, not section 31 syndrome.

I'm working on a rough pencil sketch of my idea for the ship's shape. I need to look more closely at the specifications Teos and everyone else has agreed upon and incorporate them. The style I'm playing around with is chunkier and beefier than most other ships. Not sleek. Sort of like a fat barracuda. The engines are shorter - since there are four, I figure they can each be somewhat shorter. Anyways, I'll post a draft soon.

Re: Our Ship - Shape

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 12:30 am
by Deepcrush
I think we should look to go back to topic to avoid where we are going with this.

Re: Our Ship - Shape

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 1:32 am
by Teaos
I am suprised at the result, I was sure the 2 nacelle design would win.

Re: Our Ship - Shape

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 1:33 am
by Mark
I am too. I voted for the 4 nacelle design but felt for sure that I was in the minority

Re: Our Ship - Shape

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 1:33 am
by Deepcrush
That would be a modern ship with only one prop. A battleship has to be able to survive damage in all areas and continue to fight.

Re: Our Ship - Shape

Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 1:39 am
by Teaos
But you dont need nacelles to fight, you need them after the fights over. In a fight they are a liability since they are the weakest part of the ship.

Also all through this design process people have been going for the option the requires the least maintanence, this one has the most.