What starship would you least like to captain?

Voyager
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: What starship would you least like to captain?

Post by Mikey »

Tsukiyumi wrote:
Mikey wrote:Agreed about the Oberth. Funny thing is, in exchange for the poor design, she doesn't really seem to have scientific apabilities too much ahead of a ship that isn't a dedicated science ship.

But yes, Graham, I remember her first appearance, and that difference in design made it pretty cool when it debuted.
Right before it went FOOM. :lol:
Technicalities.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
cbosdell
Chief petty officer
Chief petty officer
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 7:18 am

Re: What starship would you least like to captain?

Post by cbosdell »

Miranda class in the late 24th Century. You're just asking to die.
JudgeKing
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 1122
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 5:53 am
Location: Somewhere in the universe

Re: What starship would you least like to captain?

Post by JudgeKing »

Raven- Darwin Award waiting to happen.
Miranda- nothing more than an oversized TIE Fighter in the late 24th century.
Frankenstein Fleet Ship- Abominations, must be purified.
Oberth Class- was destroyed in its first appearence, oversized cannon fodder.
There is not a problem in this world that can't be solved without the proper application of a sufficient number of thermonuclear ordnance.
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: What starship would you least like to captain?

Post by Captain Seafort »

JudgeKing wrote:Raven- Darwin Award waiting to happen.
That was due to the stupidity of its crew, rather than an inherent design flaw
Oberth Class- was destroyed in its first appearence, oversized cannon fodder.
True, but its a science ship. It's not intended to fight battles.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15372
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: What starship would you least like to captain?

Post by Teaos »

Oberth fitted its roll well. Its the type of ship people around here love because it does one thing rather than trying to swiss army knife a dozen jobs into one hull.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Aaron
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
Contact:

Re: What starship would you least like to captain?

Post by Aaron »

Captain Seafort wrote:
True, but its a science ship. It's not intended to fight battles.
Exactly, what do people expect from it anyways? She was deep in Federation territory and was a science vessel, SF's equivilant of an ocean mapping vessel. How well would one of those withstand a Harpoon?
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: What starship would you least like to captain?

Post by Mikey »

Teaos wrote:Oberth fitted its roll well. Its the type of ship people around here love because it does one thing rather than trying to swiss army knife a dozen jobs into one hull.
You'd think so. But I'd still like to see one instance of an Oberth being shown to have greater scientific capabilities than a contemporary ship.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15372
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: What starship would you least like to captain?

Post by Teaos »

It doesnt need to be greater. It just needs to fill its roll as well for less resourses and be better suited.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: What starship would you least like to captain?

Post by Mikey »

Teaos wrote:It doesnt need to be greater. It just needs to fill its roll as well for less resourses and be better suited.
One would think that a dedicated science ship should be better at scientific missions than a non-science ship. But, oh well. I understand your point about being equivalent but cheaper; but how do you get "better suited" for a role if you're not actually better at it?
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Re: What starship would you least like to captain?

Post by Graham Kennedy »

It's not necessarily true that a science vessel would have more scientific capability than something like an explorer. The way I always thought of them was that their advantage lay in the fact that they were cheap to build, cheap to operate, more numerous, and so could undertake longer term work. Whereas a Galaxy would bring all the best sensors and science equipment to a new planet, chances are it could only stay a few days before the next assignment. An Oberth might be much more austere in its scientific capabilities but could stay in orbit for months mapping the surface, gathering samples, charting the climate and weather over the long term, recording seasonal variations, tracking animal migration patterns, all the kinds of things that don't take big fancy equipment but do take people being there for month after month.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15372
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: What starship would you least like to captain?

Post by Teaos »

One would think that a dedicated science ship should be better at scientific missions than a non-science ship. But, oh well. I understand your point about being equivalent but cheaper; but how do you get "better suited" for a role if you're not actually better at it?
You can always add sensors to a big ship to let it do what a pure science ship can do but it wont have been built for that one purpose in mind thus will be inferor in certain ways.

Designing a ship just for science can allow you to creat wide open labs that flow into each other. Easier computer access and power supply. Have quarters right next to labs so people can work when they need to. Things that you just cant get away with on a normal ship.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: What starship would you least like to captain?

Post by Mikey »

Ah. Just a semantic difference, then. Everything you just described, Teaos, would be what I consider "better" - not just the actual material capability.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
RK_Striker_JK_5
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 13039
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Location: New Hampshire
Contact:

Re: What starship would you least like to captain?

Post by RK_Striker_JK_5 »

Oberth-class.
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: What starship would you least like to captain?

Post by Tsukiyumi »

Any of the shuttles up to the type-11 would be my choice.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: What starship would you least like to captain?

Post by Mikey »

Tsukiyumi wrote:Any of the shuttles up to the type-11 would be my choice.
Is that really a captaincy?
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Post Reply