www.ditl.org

I know I'm not a founder.

Grundig

Why, because he's late?
Please don't tell me you're going to pull what Teaos did in the first game. Accusing everyone is a poor tactic.

it's only a bad tactic if it does nothing. So it might be good depending on who the founders are.

But spreading the suspicion on everyone never does good, it only blurs the identity of the actual Founders.

stitch626 wrote:Why, because he's late?
Please don't tell me you're going to pull what Teaos did in the first game. Accusing everyone is a poor tactic.

It worked beautifully last game, and would again, I'm just toning it down a bit more than last time.

But it is a good way of getting the game moving and showing founders up.

Actually, it was your suicide that outed the founders, not your open accusations.

Yeah but it was my accusation to start with that got people talking and acting odd. The last game dragged on for 3 weeks because no one was doing it. Now if both Bob and I do it they should come out pretty fast.

If you say so.

Currently I'm rather suspicious of Stitch. Disarming ourselves when faced with a dangerous enemy is....counter-productive, to say the least.

Nah I think thats just in game banter more than anything, since phasers dont actually count for anything in game it doesnt matter. We basically know nothing right now, there is only one person who I am a little sus about and thats based on very little.

Teaos is right. I decided just to be different. And personally, I would probably go without a phaser, its not like it would help us.

there is only one person who I am a little sus about and thats based on very little.

Who's that?

I'm not letting on who I think is trying to kill us may as well just paint a target on me then.

Teaos has a point. I forgot about that. Well, I'm not too afraid.
My suspects are Rochey (because you haven't been a founder yet ), Teaos (because you scare me ), and that's about it.
Honestly, at this point I don't have real suspects, I'm just joking.