What type of ship?

Blackstar the Chakat · Thu Jun 19, 2008 12:44 pm

Rochey wrote:I vote for NX with canon stats. Why downgade the statts at all?

That's what I've been saying! I can't belive of all people Rochey agrees with me here.

Post by **Mikey** » Thu Jun 19, 2008 2:34 pm

ChakatBlackstar wrote:
Rochey wrote:I vote for NX with canon stats. Why downgade the statts at all?
That's what I've been saying! I can't belive of all people Rochey agrees with me here.

DEFINITELY a bug in the new forum.

stitch626 · Post by **stitch626** » Thu Jun 19, 2008 9:19 pm

I say Intrepid. I liked the design. I thought it was cool.

Sionnach Glic · Post by **Sionnach Glic** » Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:07 pm

DEFINITELY a bug in the new forum.

I blame the French.

Seriously, though, what rationale is there for making our ship, which was launched after the NX-01, less powerful than our predecesor? If anything our ship should be slightly more powerful, but keeping it the same would be fine with me.

Sonic Glitch · Post by **Sonic Glitch** » Sat Jun 21, 2008 10:56 pm

It's already been hashed (see: argued) out...please please please don't throw a wrench in it now. We can argue this for decades, but for the purpose of the RP, please let it rest.

Blackstar the Chakat · Sat Jun 21, 2008 11:02 pm

me,myself and I wrote:It's already been hashed (see: argued) out...please please please don't throw a wrench in it now.

Why not? Maybe a wrench will fix it

Sonic Glitch · Post by **Sonic Glitch** » Sat Jun 21, 2008 11:03 pm

ChakatBlackstar wrote:
me,myself and I wrote:It's already been hashed (see: argued) out...please please please don't throw a wrench in it now.
Why not? Maybe a wrench will fix it

what about that one left over part?

Post by **Captain Seafort** » Sat Jun 21, 2008 11:12 pm

Rochey wrote:Seriously, though, what rationale is there for making our ship, which was launched after the NX-01, less powerful than our predecesor? If anything our ship should be slightly more powerful, but keeping it the same would be fine with me.

Who said anything about making it less powerful? We're simply disposing of the ENT technology that contradicts the previous descriptions of Romulan War-era armament. A 5 MT nuke is more powerful than a 3 MT photon(ic) torpedo, and a 600 GW laser is more powerful than a 500 GW phaser cannon, without violating prevously established canon.

Blackstar the Chakat · Sun Jun 22, 2008 12:23 am

Captain Seafort wrote:
Rochey wrote:Seriously, though, what rationale is there for making our ship, which was launched after the NX-01, less powerful than our predecesor? If anything our ship should be slightly more powerful, but keeping it the same would be fine with me.
Who said anything about making it less powerful? We're simply disposing of the ENT technology that contradicts the previous descriptions of Romulan War-era armament. A 5 MT nuke is more powerful than a 3 MT photon(ic) torpedo, and a 600 GW laser is more powerful than a 500 GW phaser cannon, without violating prevously established canon.

VISUALS TRUMP DIALOG. SPOCK MADE A MISTAKE! YOU GUYS CHEATED AT THE POLLS(Echoing Florda, I demand a recount). WE'RE STUCK WITH IT ANYWAY.

Basically Rochey, these guys are doing to this RP, what Florda did to the US when Bush first got elected.

Monroe · Post by **Monroe** » Sun Jun 22, 2008 3:25 am

Mikey wrote:Nope. Lasers and atomics are supported by canon; Romulans w/o FTL drive are not.

Not anymore they aren't.

Monroe · Post by **Monroe** » Sun Jun 22, 2008 3:30 am

Rochey wrote:I vote for NX with canon stats. Why downgade the statts at all?

Because 3 people (by my count) voted for the downgraded stats but haven't joined the RP making the poll in the margin of error.

Reliant121 · Post by **Reliant121** » Sun Jun 22, 2008 7:56 am

what? non-roleplayers have voted? If that is the case we'll have to revise it.

Reliant121 · Post by **Reliant121** » Sun Jun 22, 2008 7:59 am

Engineer section altered.

Monroe · Post by **Monroe** » Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:01 am

Reliant121 wrote:what? non-roleplayers have voted? If that is the case we'll have to revise it.

Its -possible- that people who intend on RPing voted. If so they haven't posted their characters.

Reliant121 · Post by **Reliant121** » Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:02 am

still. If there are indescrepancies then there must be measures taken to eliminate them.

i'm not sure what they are yet...

What type of ship?

What class of starship?

Re: What type of ship?

Re: What type of ship?

Re: What type of ship?

Re: What type of ship?

Re: What type of ship?

Re: What type of ship?

Re: What type of ship?

Re: What type of ship?

Re: What type of ship?

Re: What type of ship?

Re: What type of ship?

Re: What type of ship?

Re: Buran Mission and vital data

Re: What type of ship?

Re: What type of ship?