www.ditl.org

I know I'm probably done for, unless the security officer saves my life in the night. But it's all we've got.

I think that's fair. We'll know if Tsu is the Founder PDQ after death. Then, if it turns out that he's innocent, Grundig goes next.

I do not wish to vote for his death. I abstain.

So, what do you suggest we do, Reliant?

I think Grundig is telling the truth, In which case Reliant may be trying to protect his partner in crime.

:::raising eyebrow at Reliant::: How is your decision logical?

At this point Grundig has put himself in this position. If Tsu is falsely executed, then Grundig KNOWS he goes out the airlock next, immedietly after. Where is the logic in his descision to make this declaration unless it is true?

With a heavy heart I have to agree to what is best for the team, and the Federation overall. I have to also vote to have Tsu "walk the plank".

It goes with out saying, but just to be clear, I vote to space Tsukiumi too.

Must we be unamimous or simple majority? Will Tsu have a chance to defend himself???

We should have a majority at least. It's 3:0, so we have majority because Reliant refuses to participate.

Which looks suspicious in and of itself.

Yes it does. But, we shall deal with that later.

Well, if Tsu turns out to be a Founder then Reliant is following him out the airlock immediately after.

My logic was based on my belief that there was not enough to secure his death, in my eyes, and nothing that secured Grundig's claim as true. But, I think there is little option. If we do not eliminate someone, then we pose a risk to ourselves. I will vote, on consideration, to terminate Tsukiyumi.

Ok, so Tsu is gone.

Yup, now we just need to find out whether he was human or Founder.
If he was human, Grundig goes out the airlock next.
If he was Founder, Reliant goes out the airlock next.