Page 2 of 2

Re: DS9 starship

Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 8:40 pm
by Mikey
Captain Seafort wrote:So, a subtype of the TR-116 then.
There is a distinction; TR-116 threads generally started, at least, with a topic.

Re: DS9 starship

Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 9:20 pm
by Captain Seafort
Mikey wrote:There is a distinction; TR-116 threads generally started, at least, with a topic.
Indeed, hence being a subtype rather than the genuine article.

Re: DS9 starship

Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 9:30 pm
by McAvoy
Trying to figure out the logic of this post. DS9 was always meant to NOT be on a starship. It was the first series to get away from the whole Starship Enterprise thing.

Hell the only other series (except Discovery) with the ship not named Enterprise, they made sure to keep them away from the area where the Enterprise works, across the galaxy!

It also wouldn't be called DS9 since its not a starship name.

It would be so different from DS9 that it wouldn't be DS9.

Re: DS9 starship

Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2018 9:37 pm
by Mikey
McAvoy wrote:Trying to figure out the logic of this post.
Well, there's your problem.

Re: DS9 starship

Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2018 2:39 am
by McAvoy
Mikey wrote:
McAvoy wrote:Trying to figure out the logic of this post.
Well, there's your problem.
Yeah really did try too.