Page 2 of 3

Re: SG-1 Season Nine

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 9:43 am
by Reliant121
I'd call it quantum but this is stargate.

Let's call it Naquadah.

Re: SG-1 Season Nine

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 5:26 pm
by Mark
:lol:

Re: SG-1 Season Nine

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 5:38 pm
by kostmayer
Do they all use Katana's like everyone else seems to?

Re: SG-1 Season Nine

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 6:29 pm
by Mark
Not this time :lol: Surprisingly it looked to me like an english broadsword or even possibly a bastard (hand and a half) sword. Of course, Mitchell WAS fighting an armored knight from Camalot :roll:


By the way, I'd like to take a minute to thank all you guys who turned me onto Stargate. WAY back when, I'd found SG1 seasons 1-3 at a used video store for between $10 - $15 each and asked the forum community if it was worth it. A resounding yes sent me back to the store and picked them up. They've been more fun for me than Voyager and Enterprise put together, and HALF of TNG. Its nice to not always watch humanity act like a pack of pacifistic blubbering idiots.

Re: SG-1 Season Nine

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 6:35 pm
by Captain Seafort
How did he end up there? More importantly why would he want to? It's a silly place.

Re: SG-1 Season Nine

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 7:33 pm
by Mark
It was a guardian hologram that activated when he pulled a sword from a stone, while they where following Merlin's trail
who was revealed to be an ancient

Re: SG-1 Season Nine

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 7:48 pm
by Tsukiyumi
Honestly, I didn't find the whole "Camelot" thing any more silly than the Asgard using holograms to pretend to be Norse gods. Especially since it only comes up in a couple of episodes.

Re: SG-1 Season Nine

Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 12:19 am
by Mark
I honestly can't say why it irks me, but it does :x

Re: SG-1 Season Nine

Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 1:02 am
by Tsukiyumi
Fair enough.

Like me with John Cusack.

Re: SG-1 Season Nine

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 1:36 am
by Mark
:laughroll:

Re: SG-1 Season Nine

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 5:12 am
by Deepcrush
Mark wrote:I honestly can't say why it irks me, but it does :x
Maybe because the whole point of the show was about things from many thousands of years ago... and King Arthur is relatively new by comparison.

Re: SG-1 Season Nine

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 9:15 pm
by Monroe
Captain Seafort wrote: It's a silly place.
haha I got the reference. :D

The Camalot thing was a little annoying. Mainly because there's still a whole host of other mythologies they could have used. They used Zepakta or whoever the guy in the crossover RP was from Mayan mythology but nothing else. They used Queztlquatle from Aztec but nothing else either. Then there are the Naga / Serpent people that they coulda used. Why dive into English mythology when there's so much more untapped is beyond me.

Re: SG-1 Season Nine

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 11:24 pm
by colmquinn
Monroe wrote:The Camalot thing was a little annoying. ..... snip
Mainly because its a much better known and more accessible to the general unwashed masses.

Re: SG-1 Season Nine

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 7:27 am
by Vic
Piffle........let them eat cake!

Re: SG-1 Season Nine

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 12:43 pm
by Deepcrush
:laughroll: