Page 2 of 3
Re: Possibility of Survivors on the Colonies Themselves
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 1:10 pm
by Tyyr
For those bombs to be visible like that we'd have been talking multi-gigaton level warheads.
Re: Possibility of Survivors on the Colonies Themselves
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 1:12 pm
by Aaron
And thats at odds with what we see of the Colonials and Cylons tech level. I just throw that whole bit out.
Re: Possibility of Survivors on the Colonies Themselves
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 1:49 pm
by Tyyr
It's something I can rationalize away as just SFX exaggeration. Otherwise the death of a world would be some little flashes in a few places and not much else.
Re: Possibility of Survivors on the Colonies Themselves
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 5:58 pm
by Sionnach Glic
I go with the Cylons having used neutron bombs as well. I rationalise the explosions we see by saying that the Cylons nuked any military instalations to ensure there could be no serious resistance.
Re: Possibility of Survivors on the Colonies Themselves
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:21 pm
by Deepcrush
Sionnach Glic wrote:I go with the Cylons having used neutron bombs as well. I rationalise the explosions we see by saying that the Cylons nuked any military instalations to ensure there could be no serious resistance.
I like this, I think I'll stick with this idea as well.
Re: Possibility of Survivors on the Colonies Themselves
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 2:34 am
by McAvoy
I ahve been think about that as well. Straight up nuking the military and neutron bombing population centers. I got the impression that the Cylons was Caprica for themselves. I doubt they would want a barren planet.
My guess, that after the bombing the Cylons went in and started to mop up the survivors. I bet after they left there are probably scattered survivors. Whether or not they will survive radiation poisoning is up in the air I suppose.
Re: Possibility of Survivors on the Colonies Themselves
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:34 am
by Deepcrush
That or they were setting off most of the bombs in the upper atmo for the EMP effects and only a few were used on the ground.
Re: Possibility of Survivors on the Colonies Themselves
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 12:28 pm
by Tyyr
Airburst weapons would leave very little in the way of radioactive fall out.
Re: Possibility of Survivors on the Colonies Themselves
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:00 pm
by Mark
Well, in oBSG the Cylons wanted to completely exterminate humanity. Is the Cylon's goal still the same here, or are they looking to subjegate and enslave?
Re: Possibility of Survivors on the Colonies Themselves
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:30 pm
by Captain Seafort
Mark wrote:Well, in oBSG the Cylons wanted to completely exterminate humanity. Is the Cylon's goal still the same here, or are they looking to subjegate and enslave?
Christ knows (or should that be "gods know"?). The Cylons' much vaunted "plan" was never properly explained in the series (although "The Plan", which I haven't seen may have untangled some of it).
Re: Possibility of Survivors on the Colonies Themselves
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:34 pm
by Sonic Glitch
Captain Seafort wrote:Mark wrote:Well, in oBSG the Cylons wanted to completely exterminate humanity. Is the Cylon's goal still the same here, or are they looking to subjegate and enslave?
Christ knows (or should that be "gods know"?). The Cylons' much vaunted "plan" was never properly explained in the series (although "The Plan", which I haven't seen may have untangled some of it).
I saw it on SciFi a week or too ago. May or may not be a spoiler but:
Re: Possibility of Survivors on the Colonies Themselves
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:52 pm
by Graham Kennedy
Re: Possibility of Survivors on the Colonies Themselves
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 11:13 am
by Sionnach Glic
Re: Possibility of Survivors on the Colonies Themselves
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 8:20 pm
by Mark
So that guy in this versions "Imperious Leader"?
Re: Possibility of Survivors on the Colonies Themselves
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 8:23 pm
by Captain Seafort
Mark wrote:So that guy in this versions "Imperious Leader"?
Sort of, only somewhat less absolute in his control, and not Steed.