Ship of the Weekend - Executor

Monroe
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 5837
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:17 am

Re: Ship of the Weekend - Executor

Post by Monroe »

GrahamKennedy wrote:Personally, I think the idea that a military force would design a ship larger that it should be so that it frightens people is just plain stupid.
But real life militaries do it all the time. Don't underestimate the technological terror they constructed.

Look at Leonardo DaVinchi's 'tank' while it wasn't -that- practical it sure was scary as all hell. Look at modern battles. The US goes into battle to Drowning Pool for a reason. It pumps up our troops and demoralizes muslim troops. Look at what the British did to the muslims in the Indian wars. They tied them in pig skin and burried them. Scaring the shit out of an enemy can be very useful.

Your world declares independence and a SSD shows up flanked by twelve star destroyers and soon you're going to have a huge problem just holding your forces together. When the Empire wants to take the gloves off they can. And it fits perfectly with Imperial military doctrine... "Fear will keep the locals in line..."
How many Minbari does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
None. They always surrender right before they finish the job and never tell you why.

-Remain Star Trek-
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Ship of the Weekend - Executor

Post by Deepcrush »

I mean, what kind of people are frightened by the size of a vehicle?
Revisit this when you see your friend ground alive under one. Think again when you have nothing to stop it and just have to watch.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Ship of the Weekend - Executor

Post by Deepcrush »

Monroe wrote:
GrahamKennedy wrote:Personally, I think the idea that a military force would design a ship larger that it should be so that it frightens people is just plain stupid.
But real life militaries do it all the time. Don't underestimate the technological terror they constructed.

Look at Leonardo DaVinchi's 'tank' while it wasn't -that- practical it sure was scary as all hell. Look at modern battles. The US goes into battle to Drowning Pool for a reason. It pumps up our troops and demoralizes muslim troops. Look at what the British did to the muslims in the Indian wars. They tied them in pig skin and burried them. Scaring the s**t out of an enemy can be very useful.

Your world declares independence and a SSD shows up flanked by twelve star destroyers and soon you're going to have a huge problem just holding your forces together. When the Empire wants to take the gloves off they can. And it fits perfectly with Imperial military doctrine... "Fear will keep the locals in line..."
Fear is a strange thing. It can keep you alive and moving fast. It can also break you down in your boots and leave you a huddled mass. Its hard to make sense of it and it never works the same way twice. Its always different some how. You can't explain it, you can't define it. Most systems wouldn't have had the power needed to beat back the Empire. An ISD is bad enough but if its part of a small SSD task force. Its going to have escorts ships like Victories and cargo ships. Troop transports and patrol frigates. The Empire could put a hundred thousand troops on a planet over night and hold total air power and control of the space above. Every person fighting back would be a sitting target.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Monroe
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 5837
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:17 am

Re: Ship of the Weekend - Executor

Post by Monroe »

Exactly the purpose of the ship wasn't to just win a battle. The purpose was to utterly crush not just them in terms of fire power but if there were any survivors to make them so afraid of the carnage that they would never strike back. Its a deterant just as much as a weapon of war.
How many Minbari does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
None. They always surrender right before they finish the job and never tell you why.

-Remain Star Trek-
User avatar
Reliant121
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 12263
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm

Re: Ship of the Weekend - Executor

Post by Reliant121 »

That I think is quite the ethos of the Empire anyway. The troopers that walk around in stark white uniforms that loosely resemble skeletal figures, Ships that dwarf their equivalents in firepower and size, Massive battleships with the destructive firepower to scorch entire continents. It's not practical in many ways, but it's fucking scary to see it and to know what it can do.
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: Ship of the Weekend - Executor

Post by Captain Seafort »

GrahamKennedy wrote:Personally, I think the idea that a military force would design a ship larger that it should be so that it frightens people is just plain stupid. The size of a ship should be based on sound principles of engineering, balancing firepower, defensive systems, mobility, logistical requirements, and other such factors. The thought of a designer sitting there thinking "Well 10 km is the most sensible length but people would be more scared of it if it was 14 km... and god, what if we made it 19 km long? I bet they'd wet their pants at that!" is just daft.
True, if that were the reasoning behind it. However, there are more reasons than intimidation to build a big ship. Extra size means more surface area to mount weapons, greater mass to absorb the recoil of said weapons (allowing bigger ones to be mounted), and greater volume to put radiators, reactors, starfighters, and troops. Bigger is, quite simply, better in every way. The only advantage smaller ships offer is flexibility - an important consideration, certainly, but there are occassions when flexibility is secondary to individual utility.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Re: Ship of the Weekend - Executor

Post by Graham Kennedy »

Captain Seafort wrote:True, if that were the reasoning behind it. However, there are more reasons than intimidation to build a big ship. Extra size means more surface area to mount weapons, greater mass to absorb the recoil of said weapons (allowing bigger ones to be mounted), and greater volume to put radiators, reactors, starfighters, and troops. Bigger is, quite simply, better in every way. The only advantage smaller ships offer is flexibility - an important consideration, certainly, but there are occassions when flexibility is secondary to individual utility.
Now this, absolutely. Bigger is better in many ways, to be sure, but then why say "they built it big to intimidate"?

I simply don't believe anybody ever built a real life battleship big for intimidation purposes. It's nonsense. The size of real life battleships was influenced by factors like how large it has to be to have the guns needed, which in turn was influenced by being able to outgun other people's battleships. Or by how much fuel and how big a set of engines it needed to have the speed and range you wanted, how much space you need for crew and provisions, all that kind of thing. But I'd bet my life savings that nobody built the Iowas because they thought making battleships bigger would make them more intimidating looking.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Re: Ship of the Weekend - Executor

Post by Graham Kennedy »

Deepcrush wrote:
I mean, what kind of people are frightened by the size of a vehicle?
Revisit this when you see your friend ground alive under one. Think again when you have nothing to stop it and just have to watch.
Yeah, because a 40 ton tank driving over somebody isn't nearly as scary as a 60 ton tank doing it, is it?
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Re: Ship of the Weekend - Executor

Post by Sionnach Glic »

I think the intimidation factor was more a side-effect. Perhaps when they were designing this thing, someone commented "hey, this thing is already fricken massive. Let's make it a bit bigger, slam on a load more guns and it'll really freak people out".
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Re: Ship of the Weekend - Executor

Post by Graham Kennedy »

I dunno, maybe it's just me. It's just when I think of people designing something like a Destroyer today, I can't imagine somebody going "You know, if we made this thing 30 feet longer and put a second gun on the front, it might freak people out and intimidate them more."

But whatever, each to their own :)
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: Ship of the Weekend - Executor

Post by Captain Seafort »

Or intimidation really was one of the original designs goals (this is Palpatine we're talking about) - they set out to build the biggest conventional starship possible to make a statement of the Empire's might, and the advantages inherent in size were simply byproducts of that fundamental goal.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Ship of the Weekend - Executor

Post by Mikey »

I'd say that both design goals went hand in hand; remember, Palpy was many things, but entirely rational wasn't one of them.

In addition, practical design definitely was considered - Seafort has brought up many times the fact of the shape of the ISD's and SSD's being optimized to provide coverage, for example.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
RK_Striker_JK_5
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 13025
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Location: New Hampshire
Contact:

Re: Ship of the Weekend - Executor

Post by RK_Striker_JK_5 »

GrahamKennedy wrote:
Captain Seafort wrote:True, if that were the reasoning behind it. However, there are more reasons than intimidation to build a big ship. Extra size means more surface area to mount weapons, greater mass to absorb the recoil of said weapons (allowing bigger ones to be mounted), and greater volume to put radiators, reactors, starfighters, and troops. Bigger is, quite simply, better in every way. The only advantage smaller ships offer is flexibility - an important consideration, certainly, but there are occassions when flexibility is secondary to individual utility.
Now this, absolutely. Bigger is better in many ways, to be sure, but then why say "they built it big to intimidate"?

I simply don't believe anybody ever built a real life battleship big for intimidation purposes. It's nonsense. The size of real life battleships was influenced by factors like how large it has to be to have the guns needed, which in turn was influenced by being able to outgun other people's battleships. Or by how much fuel and how big a set of engines it needed to have the speed and range you wanted, how much space you need for crew and provisions, all that kind of thing. But I'd bet my life savings that nobody built the Iowas because they thought making battleships bigger would make them more intimidating looking.
Palpatine would, though. It's the way of the Sith. Crush your enemies in every single way. The Exxie's not practical, but scares the shavit out of enemies of the Empire. So it's good and fulfills its design. Doesn't hurt that it's also pretty damned powerful. Nigh-invincible.

Just tell that to... Arvel Crynyd. ;)
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: Ship of the Weekend - Executor

Post by Captain Seafort »

RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:Just tell that to... Arvel Crynyd. ;)
Crynyd would have been but a smear on the shields if Ackbar and Calrissian hadn't taken the fleet in close and concentrated fire on the Ex's shields and power generators. Even then, it was pure chance that his fighter got through the fire from the forward batteries and happened to hit the bridge - that was a one in a million fluke. That, or the will of the Force. :wink:
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
RK_Striker_JK_5
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 13025
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Location: New Hampshire
Contact:

Re: Ship of the Weekend - Executor

Post by RK_Striker_JK_5 »

Captain Seafort wrote:
RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:Just tell that to... Arvel Crynyd. ;)
Crynyd would have been but a smear on the shields if Ackbar and Calrissian hadn't taken the fleet in close and concentrated fire on the Ex's shields and power generators. Even then, it was pure chance that his fighter got through the fire from the forward batteries and happened to hit the bridge - that was a one in a million fluke. That, or the will of the Force. :wink:
Yeah, but who will history remember, the gunners or him ramming his A-wing into the bridge, screaming defiance as his fighter disintegrates around him?

Besieds, it was still damned cool and badass. The smallest fighter in the Rebel Fleet taking down the largest ship in the imperial fleet, indirectly sending it into the Death Star like a dagger.
Post Reply