www.ditl.org

Posted: **Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:54 pm**

Yeah, that could probably work.

Posted: **Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 pm**

True, but I think the question was the generation of the beam, not the absorption of it.

Posted: **Fri Jul 18, 2008 3:00 am**

Yeah its not the fact that she would be shooting her self with a phasers, Its the fact she made a phaser beam.

Posted: **Fri Jul 18, 2008 3:13 am**

Teaos wrote:Yeah its not the fact that she would be shooting her self with a phasers, Its the fact she made a phaser beam.

I think I did that as a high school project once.

Have you seen my phase pistol?

Posted: **Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:46 pm**

ChakatBlackstar wrote:Have you seen my phase pistol?

I thought you were just happy to see me.

Posted: **Sat Jul 19, 2008 9:24 pm**

Teaos wrote:Yeah its not the fact that she would be shooting her self with a phasers, Its the fact she made a phaser beam.

I'm not suggesting that she created a phaser beam at all - I'm suggesting that the phaser was genuine, not part of her body.

Posted: **Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:36 am**

I can't remember for sure, but did we ever "actually see" her fire that phaser, or just say that she did?

Posted: **Wed Jul 30, 2008 5:16 am**

We actually see it. (Psst...quotation marks aren't for emphasis! I am anal about that.)

Posted: **Wed Jul 30, 2008 11:04 am**

dbutler1986 wrote:We actually see it. (Psst...quotation marks aren't for emphasis! I am anal about that.)

Well, for god's sake don't let Deepcrush know.

Nitpick with review of DS9:"Heart of Stone"