Ship of the Week: Lancer-class frigate
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Ship of the Week: Lancer-class frigate
We've looked at some good ships recently, so I think it's time to examine a godawful piece of shit. It's meant to be an anti-starfighter ship, but not only can most of them outrun it pretty easily, they're pretty vulnerable to them as well, as "Rogue Squadron" shows. They've got no weapons worthy of their size, and they're pretty flimsy - even a bulk freighter a fraction of their size can be refitted to be a match for one of the blasted things. In short - a waste of money. Discuss.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Re: Ship of the Week: Lancer-class frigate
Unfortunate. A waste of a good concept.
Needs better defenses from fighter attack (better shields, and more small laser cannons).
Needs better defenses from fighter attack (better shields, and more small laser cannons).
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Ship of the Week: Lancer-class frigate
Yeah, 20 quad lasers seems like a good idea. Unfortunately, being unshielded and slow means that it suffers from the same vulnerabilities of cap ships that it was supposed to combat. Of course, that also means that if it is being effective then it is little more than target practice for a capital ship.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Ship of the Week: Lancer-class frigate
Another problem is the cost of the ship. It costs as much as a pair of A-wing squadrons which would be at least as useful.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Re: Ship of the Week: Lancer-class frigate
I thought it costs as much as a larger cruiser?
Reminds me abit like the AA cruisers of WW2.
Neat idea but execution sucks.
Reminds me abit like the AA cruisers of WW2.
Neat idea but execution sucks.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Ship of the Week: Lancer-class frigate
From where do you get cost figures? I don't doubt you, and that fact makes the Lancer suck even more, I'm just curious as to where to find those figures.Deepcrush wrote:Another problem is the cost of the ship. It costs as much as a pair of A-wing squadrons which would be at least as useful.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Re: Ship of the Week: Lancer-class frigate
I read it that the Lancers cost as much as a heavy cruiser/cruiser from the Essentials. Obviously those books are not to be entirely trusted. Though the line drawings are greats except for the Executor.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Ship of the Week: Lancer-class frigate
@mikey. Its cost was a foot note in one of the RPG books. It didn't say an exact number so feel free to disregard a direct price tag. However the balance is that someone could replace a single Lancer with fighters rather easily.
@macavoy. If that were the case then a single lancer could be replaced by a whole wing of advanced fighters which seems unlikely to me.
@macavoy. If that were the case then a single lancer could be replaced by a whole wing of advanced fighters which seems unlikely to me.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
- Lighthawk
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 4632
- Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 7:55 pm
- Location: Missouri, USA, North America, Earth, Sol System, Orion Arm, Milkyway Galaxy, Local Group, Universe
Re: Ship of the Week: Lancer-class frigate
Pretty much agree with the general consensus, good idea, lousy execution. At least it showed the Imps were starting to realize the rebel fighters were a serious problem. Probably would have been much more effective as a missile boat rather than a gun boat though. Aside from cost and weak defense, part of it's problem was trying to fight fighters at their ranges, rather than at cap ship ranges. Since it was, as was pointed out, slower than the fighters, that made it near impossible for them to fight on their terms instead of the enemy fighter's.
Re: Ship of the Week: Lancer-class frigate
Well regardless it was always said that the Lancers were failure and too expensive to be put in numbers.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Ship of the Week: Lancer-class frigate
Understood. It makes sense - 20 quad lasers + hyperdrive by themselves count for a good-sized price tag. I think the Lancer is an excellent example of someone looking at the armament of a ship and deciding what it should do, rather than having a ship purposefully designed for that role.Deepcrush wrote:@mikey. Its cost was a foot note in one of the RPG books. It didn't say an exact number so feel free to disregard a direct price tag. However the balance is that someone could replace a single Lancer with fighters rather easily.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Ship of the Week: Lancer-class frigate
20 quads sound good to start but really that's rather weak When you figure that a ship has six angles to cover. A single fighter squadron could engage a lancer from a flank.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Ship of the Week: Lancer-class frigate
And then outrun it after an attack run. That's why it seems like someone just saw the armament and decided what it would be good for without any practical experience.Deepcrush wrote:20 quads sound good to start but really that's rather weak When you figure that a ship has six angles to cover. A single fighter squadron could engage a lancer from a flank.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Ship of the Week: Lancer-class frigate
In which case the Lancer would be able to hit them with 60% of its firepower. A much bigger problem the ship has is the effectiveness of its weapons - if Rogue Squadron is to be believed, its weapons' range is less than the maximum range of a proton torpedo, although much greater than the maximum range of a fighter's targeting sensors. This allowed a squadron of Y-wings to fire from well outside its range, using an X-wing as an aiming mark, which flew in close, dodged everything the Lancer threw at it, ducked under the ship, and the torps struck and destroyed the Lancer. The sequence has several problems, not least the claim that said range is less than 14.5 km, but it handily demonstrates the weakness of the class.Deepcrush wrote:20 quads sound good to start but really that's rather weak When you figure that a ship has six angles to cover. A single fighter squadron could engage a lancer from a flank.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Re: Ship of the Week: Lancer-class frigate
It's one of those classic cases of the best defense against a plane is another plane, not the AA defense of a ship. Problem is that the weapons have an X speed which they can train and track targets. In which the best way to fix this problem would be more guns.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"