Starfleet Command's Worst Decisions
- Lighthawk
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 4632
- Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 7:55 pm
- Location: Missouri, USA, North America, Earth, Sol System, Orion Arm, Milkyway Galaxy, Local Group, Universe
Starfleet Command's Worst Decisions
In the same line as Striker's worst captain X decisions, what would you consider to be the worst orders SF command has ever issued?
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 21747
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
- Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
- Contact:
Re: Starfleet Command's Worst Decisions
Besides making Janeway an Admiral?
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Starfleet Command's Worst Decisions
No that was a good move! It got her away from command! Being in charge of office 301B, department of payroll, is perfect!Tsukiyumi wrote:Besides making Janeway an Admiral?
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
- Lighthawk
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 4632
- Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 7:55 pm
- Location: Missouri, USA, North America, Earth, Sol System, Orion Arm, Milkyway Galaxy, Local Group, Universe
Re: Starfleet Command's Worst Decisions
Aye, getting her out of the captain's chair was a good move. As Kirk said to Picard in Generations, being in the big chair is where you make a difference. In Janeway's case, it was a difference for the worse.
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Starfleet Command's Worst Decisions
1) Putting children on warships
2) The TNG-era Prime Directive
3) Signing off on the design for the GCS
4) Aiming the full-scale test of the soliton wave at an inhabited planet ("New Ground")
5) Putting Sisko in charge of hunting down Eddington ("For the Cause", "For the Uniform")
6) Promoting Janeway to Captain
2) The TNG-era Prime Directive
3) Signing off on the design for the GCS
4) Aiming the full-scale test of the soliton wave at an inhabited planet ("New Ground")
5) Putting Sisko in charge of hunting down Eddington ("For the Cause", "For the Uniform")
6) Promoting Janeway to Captain
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Starfleet Command's Worst Decisions
Agreed all the way around!Captain Seafort wrote:1) Putting children on warships
2) The TNG-era Prime Directive
3) Signing off on the design for the GCS
4) Aiming the full-scale test of the soliton wave at an inhabited planet ("New Ground")
5) Putting Sisko in charge of hunting down Eddington ("For the Cause", "For the Uniform")
6) Promoting Janeway to Captain
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Re: Starfleet Command's Worst Decisions
I would say not going to war with the Dominion earlier. Mine the wormhole early so the combined Cardassian/Dominion fleet would be much more managable. Starfleet may not be ready but neither would the Dominion.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Starfleet Command's Worst Decisions
That depends on how ready Starfleet was for war. We've seen how well equipped they usually are, so an early start might have left them in an even worse position. Another problem might have been public opinion - they needed to demonstrate to the population as a whole that the Dominion wasn't just moving in forces to defend their Cardassian ally, but building up a force to conquer the Alpha Quadrant.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Re: Starfleet Command's Worst Decisions
Everything tactical.
No dedicated warships until later on.
No body armor.
No protective gear on away missions. Even into caves!
Phasers which are impossible to aim.
No ground vehicles worth anything.
No Air superiority vehicles such as fighters.
And then let's not forget holodecks which are incredibly unsafe. They would have been recalled so early on if they came out in real life. But I guess that is more of a Federation error not a Starfleet error.
No dedicated warships until later on.
No body armor.
No protective gear on away missions. Even into caves!
Phasers which are impossible to aim.
No ground vehicles worth anything.
No Air superiority vehicles such as fighters.
And then let's not forget holodecks which are incredibly unsafe. They would have been recalled so early on if they came out in real life. But I guess that is more of a Federation error not a Starfleet error.
How many Minbari does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
None. They always surrender right before they finish the job and never tell you why.
-Remain Star Trek-
None. They always surrender right before they finish the job and never tell you why.
-Remain Star Trek-
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Starfleet Command's Worst Decisions
Every ship in the TNG era. They only got better again during DS9.
The uniforms from ST:TMP. Seriously, what the fuck?
Making Janeway a captain.
Putting Archer in charge of humanity's first true inter-stellar starship.
The TNG era Prime Directive.
Ship security and the Federation's ground forces.
The uniforms from ST:TMP. Seriously, what the fuck?
Making Janeway a captain.
Putting Archer in charge of humanity's first true inter-stellar starship.
The TNG era Prime Directive.
Ship security and the Federation's ground forces.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
- BigJKU316
- Captain
- Posts: 1949
- Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:19 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Re: Starfleet Command's Worst Decisions
Not building Defiants in as large of numbers as possible as soon as the design was finished. Simply put it makes the most logical sense and it helps your exploration mission as you can release tons of longer legged ships to go out exploring if you have a solid core of defense ships back home.
The Defiant is the perfect modern Destroyer and there literally should have been hundreds of them running around. Escort was the perfect name for it because that is what it should have been doing in battle is providing close escort to major ships. Instead it was serving as a freaking flagship half the time.
And that brings me to my next, and possibly biggest gripe. WHY ARE THERE NO FLAG BRIDGES ON ANY SHIPS?
I just don't get it. How can you possibly expect to command a fleet and a ship at the same time? Who can do that? Sisko spent the whole war issuing orders through a single subordinate officer and spent most of his time fighting the Defiant. There should be a flag bridge for the commander of the fleet, distinct from the ships bridge. Command and Control was just so God awful I can't even begin.
The Defiant is the perfect modern Destroyer and there literally should have been hundreds of them running around. Escort was the perfect name for it because that is what it should have been doing in battle is providing close escort to major ships. Instead it was serving as a freaking flagship half the time.
And that brings me to my next, and possibly biggest gripe. WHY ARE THERE NO FLAG BRIDGES ON ANY SHIPS?
I just don't get it. How can you possibly expect to command a fleet and a ship at the same time? Who can do that? Sisko spent the whole war issuing orders through a single subordinate officer and spent most of his time fighting the Defiant. There should be a flag bridge for the commander of the fleet, distinct from the ships bridge. Command and Control was just so God awful I can't even begin.
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 13071
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
- Location: New Hampshire
- Contact:
Re: Starfleet Command's Worst Decisions
TNG phaser design?
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Starfleet Command's Worst Decisions
It's possible that the Definat class was simply too expensive to justify mass production. It'd certainly explain why there are so few examples of such a powerful ship around.BigJKU316 wrote:Not building Defiants in as large of numbers as possible as soon as the design was finished. Simply put it makes the most logical sense and it helps your exploration mission as you can release tons of longer legged ships to go out exploring if you have a solid core of defense ships back home.
The Defiant is the perfect modern Destroyer and there literally should have been hundreds of them running around. Escort was the perfect name for it because that is what it should have been doing in battle is providing close escort to major ships. Instead it was serving as a freaking flagship half the time.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
- BigJKU316
- Captain
- Posts: 1949
- Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:19 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Re: Starfleet Command's Worst Decisions
I just don't see that. Cost for ships is almost always a function of size, at least among warships. Electronics and weapons are the biggest drivers of cost but they scale pretty much with size, because you build the ship to carry the electronics or weapons. Ship design pretty much starts with "What do we want it to do and what do we need to do that?" then you design the hull to hold all those things.Sionnach Glic wrote:It's possible that the Definat class was simply too expensive to justify mass production. It'd certainly explain why there are so few examples of such a powerful ship around.BigJKU316 wrote:Not building Defiants in as large of numbers as possible as soon as the design was finished. Simply put it makes the most logical sense and it helps your exploration mission as you can release tons of longer legged ships to go out exploring if you have a solid core of defense ships back home.
The Defiant is the perfect modern Destroyer and there literally should have been hundreds of them running around. Escort was the perfect name for it because that is what it should have been doing in battle is providing close escort to major ships. Instead it was serving as a freaking flagship half the time.
The Defiant might have more weapons, but it has less sensors, no science labs (which in many cases would be the most expensive spaces on major ships) no holodecks and less creature comforts. Initial cost would be high to cover weapons development I would guess, but that is a fixed cost once developed, going forward your unit cost would actually drop the more you made as you found efficiencies in the production line.
When compared against other Federation ships the Defiant should be much cheaper on an ongoing production basis.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Re: Starfleet Command's Worst Decisions
The Defiant is also capable of taking on vessels many times its size, indicating that there's some seriously powerful weapons and generators built into it, comparable to much larger ships. The cost of not just building those, but also miniturising them enough to fit into such a small hull can't be low.
Really, there are only two realistic reasons as to why Starfleet never built more Defiants. Either because of mass stupidity (and as one of Starfleet's more vocal critics on this site, I'd have no problem believing that), or because there was some other factor preventing their production. In this instance I'm willing to give Starfleet the benefit of the doubt.
Really, there are only two realistic reasons as to why Starfleet never built more Defiants. Either because of mass stupidity (and as one of Starfleet's more vocal critics on this site, I'd have no problem believing that), or because there was some other factor preventing their production. In this instance I'm willing to give Starfleet the benefit of the doubt.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"