Teaos wrote:
I didnt say no money cant lead to worse things. I said it is irrelivant to my point. Fact is there is always another way. You continued refuseal to say what you did to stay off welfare ties my hands a little but as I said there are many options out there to avoid it.
There is always another way? Relying on other's charity? There's no such charities for people without work. Again, showing your complete and utter lack of understanding.
And as I said. If it was set up properly Charity could be there to support those who truely need the help. Charity given by those who give tie and money in their own free will.
Charities are only given money to be charitable people. What if no one money to them? And again, there aren't charities - welfare takes its place, so to speak.
Oh I get it just fine. Your family got in trouble. Duff luck it happens to a lot of people me included. What I'm saying is that to let emotions and personal hardship cloud judgement is a terrible way to make decisions. There are huge problems with the welfare state and it should be abolished. Thats not to say people still cant help out others if they want.
Your following paragraph shows actually you
don't get it. Emotions aren't clouding my judgement what so ever - I used my own situation as an example of why welfare is required; and why nearly every (if not every) western country in the world gives welfare.
But of course - I forgot - you want to live in a country where everything is choice. Where you can choose who you want to murder. Where you can choose whether you want to steal. Where you can choose whether you want to give money to person x and not person y. You don't have a clue what you're talking about, and the modern world shows this in two ways;
1) There are no such countries where everything is choice, and never will be, as they will no longer be a country - without government, laws, or leadership.
2) All western countries give welfare.
Of course, you're right and they're all wrong.
