Death Star weapons question
Death Star weapons question
Am I correct in the thought that the ONLY anti-capital ship weapon the Death Star(s) have is the main planetary gun? Other than that is there just the small surface/deck guns?
Ugh... do not thump the Book of G'Quan...
Theres a line at the end of Star Wars IV that suggests the Death Star's defenses were based around repelling an attack from Captial Ships, rather then small fighters. I would have thought that it would at least have a few anti Captial Ship weapons on board. I don't recall ever seeing any fired on either the original Death Star or the Death Star II. The Death Star II was using its main laser to take out Rebel Capital Ships.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
No. The surface guns are anti-capital weapons. That's why they were too slow to shoot down the starfighters. The Death Star is so large that an attack by a capital ship would be the same as a planetary assault. However they are defensive weapons as their range is only about 80 kilometers. Given the ranges at the Battle of Endor the shield from the planet are probably too large to let a ship reach weapons range, which is why they only used the Superlaser.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
Er, those millions of surface guns are capship guns.Other than that is there just the small surface/deck guns?
That's why they had such difficulty shooting down the fighters. Although the results they had were quite impresive.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Those surface guns are the same model as those used on the ISD. Since the heavy guns of the Clone War-era Venator class SD had a range in excess of 10 light minutes (180 million km) the ISD's probably do as well. The reasons the superlaser was being used instead were 1) the DSII was incomplete, 2) it was probably a lot easier to open a single window in the shiel for the superlaser, to avoid risking fighters slipping through the holes, 3) the SL was a one-hit-kill weapon and 4) Palpy was showing off his new toy.ChakatBlackstar wrote:No. The surface guns are anti-capital weapons. That's why they were too slow to shoot down the starfighters. The Death Star is so large that an attack by a capital ship would be the same as a planetary assault. However they are defensive weapons as their range is only about 80 kilometers. Given the ranges at the Battle of Endor the shield from the planet are probably too large to let a ship reach weapons range, which is why they only used the Superlaser.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
That was becuase Palpatine wanted to take the rebels down slowly. He needed to use their deaths to convert Luke, that's also why the Imperial fleet never engaged the rebels, until Lando ordered the rebel fleet to close to point blank range.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
What? My sources say they have a max range of 100 km, and an optimal range of 15 kilometersCaptain Seafort wrote:Those surface guns are the same model as those used on the ISD. Since the heavy guns of the Clone War-era Venator class SD had a range in excess of 10 light minutes (180 million km) the ISD's probably do as well. The reasons the superlaser was being used instead were 1) the DSII was incomplete, 2) it was probably a lot easier to open a single window in the shiel for the superlaser, to avoid risking fighters slipping through the holes, 3) the SL was a one-hit-kill weapon and 4) Palpy was showing off his new toy.ChakatBlackstar wrote:No. The surface guns are anti-capital weapons. That's why they were too slow to shoot down the starfighters. The Death Star is so large that an attack by a capital ship would be the same as a planetary assault. However they are defensive weapons as their range is only about 80 kilometers. Given the ranges at the Battle of Endor the shield from the planet are probably too large to let a ship reach weapons range, which is why they only used the Superlaser.
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
What sources are those? The fact that DS surface guns are the same as ISD's comes from the Essential Guide to Weapons and Technology, while the 10 light-minute range for Venator HTLs comes from the Revenge of the Sith Incredible Cross-Sections. More to the point, does it make sense to you that heavy starship weapons have a maximum range less than the diametre of the vessel mounting them, and an optimum range less than that of an AT-AT (which fired on the Hoth base generators at 17.28 km)?ChakatBlackstar wrote:What? My sources say they have a max range of 100 km, and an optimal range of 15 kilometers
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15379
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
Yes I believe in the briefing they said the weapons would have a hard time tracking fighters since they were ment for capital ships.
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
My source is The New essential guide to Weapons and Technology. Pg 70-71. Taim and Bak XX-9 heavy Turbolasers. Used on Both Death Stars and Imperial Star Destroyers. The Death Star's superlaser also has a maximum range of 420,000 km.
And Seafort, two things. 1) The Death Stars are mobile battle stations not vessels. 2)We're talking about a military group that lost a moon sized station to 30 fighters and an old frieghter. Of coarse it doesn't make sense.
They're using off the shelf defense weapons, stuff designed for conventional warships, not a battle station. If it helps don't think of the Death Star as a ship, think of it as a moon.
And Seafort, two things. 1) The Death Stars are mobile battle stations not vessels. 2)We're talking about a military group that lost a moon sized station to 30 fighters and an old frieghter. Of coarse it doesn't make sense.
They're using off the shelf defense weapons, stuff designed for conventional warships, not a battle station. If it helps don't think of the Death Star as a ship, think of it as a moon.
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 13071
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
- Location: New Hampshire
- Contact: