My thoughts: Magazine Capacity

Discuss the site here - suggestions, comments, complaints, etc.
User avatar
Akira Takei
Crewman
Crewman
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 8:12 pm

Re: My thoughts: Magazine Capacity

Post by Akira Takei »

GrahamKennedy wrote:Perhaps. But they've certainly never so much as hinted at that. And extending shields around other ships makes them weaker, not stronger.
Extending shields has been shown to be a viable combat tactic in the Voyager episode "Think Tank." I can't think of any other, in universe, rationalization for ships to fly so close together.
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Re: My thoughts: Magazine Capacity

Post by Graham Kennedy »

Akira Takei wrote:
GrahamKennedy wrote:Perhaps. But they've certainly never so much as hinted at that. And extending shields around other ships makes them weaker, not stronger.
Extending shields has been shown to be a viable combat tactic in the Voyager episode "Think Tank." I can't think of any other, in universe, rationalization for ships to fly so close together.
In Think Tank, the ships attack in pairs and one stays behind the other to reinforce the lead ship's shields. It's lending shield strength to another ship, but it's at the cost of making your own vulnerable. A tactic that can only work if you are facing one enemy on one axis of attack.

It would be suicidal to do it in fleet combat.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6225
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: My thoughts: Magazine Capacity

Post by McAvoy »

Fleet combat needs to be flexible. Can't do that if your ships are linked to another. Ships may need to pull out to reineforce a weakened line somewhere else.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
Coalition
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 1142
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:34 am
Location: Georgia, United States
Contact:

Re: My thoughts: Magazine Capacity

Post by Coalition »

McAvoy wrote:Fleet combat needs to be flexible. Can't do that if your ships are linked to another. Ships may need to pull out to reineforce a weakened line somewhere else.
You could do that by assigning the ships in 2-ship groups. One ship leads, the other follows. The problem is that the pattern will stick out to the opponent, and makes their targeting much easier. The trailing ship will always be within a certain distance of the lead ship, and the extended shields mean it will have weaker defenses. It also means the trailing ship has a giant no-fire zone, o you only have to deal with the weapons from one ship, instead of two.

Two ships like that vs two enemy ships that are free to maneuver mean the enemy ships can get one of them to the side, to open fire on the trailing vessel. If they choose to stay in front, they only have to worry about weapons fire from one of the two ships.

The better strategy is to have a reserve formation, composed of your long-range bombardment vessels, where ships with low shields can return to perform repairs, restore shields, etc.
Relativity Calculator
My Nomination for "MVAM Critic Award" (But can it be broken into 3 separate pieces?)
Post Reply