|
| Canon source | Backstage source | Novel source | DITL speculation |
| # | Series | Season | Source | Comment |
| 1 | Speculative | (388 m) A tricky one - I can find no reference to the length of this ship anywhere. I measured the distance between two rows of windows on the picture and assumed three metres per deck to scale the drawing, and calculated the length from that. There is likely to be a fairly significant degree of error in this figure. |
||
| 2 | Speculative | Pagh Class - Originally Karemma ship (388 m) Identical to the Karemma ship since the same model is used for both. |
||
| 3 | Star Trek Deep Space Nine Technical Manual | Centaur Class (381.87 m) Stated on page 156. This is the size we would expect if the saucer section matches that of a standard Excelsior in size; however, the DS9 TM figures for height and beam do not match those calculated from scale diagrams using this length. |
| Source : | Speculative |
| Comment : | (388 m) A tricky one - I can find no reference to the length of this ship anywhere. I measured the distance between two rows of windows on the picture and assumed three metres per deck to scale the drawing, and calculated the length from that. There is likely to be a fairly significant degree of error in this figure. |
| Source : | Speculative |
| Comment : | Pagh Class - Originally Karemma ship (388 m) Identical to the Karemma ship since the same model is used for both. |
| Book : | Star Trek Deep Space Nine Technical Manual |
| Comment : | Centaur Class (381.87 m) Stated on page 156. This is the size we would expect if the saucer section matches that of a standard Excelsior in size; however, the DS9 TM figures for height and beam do not match those calculated from scale diagrams using this length. |
| © Graham & Ian Kennedy | Page views : 18,623 | Last updated : 28 Oct 2003 |
