Search
Home
Mobile Site Caption Comp Monthly Poll Sudden Death Book Reviews Game Reviews Colour Key Statistics Cookie Usage
FED SHIPS OTHER A-K FLEETS WEAPONRY SPECIES PERSONNEL TIMELINE CALCULATOR GALLERIES TEMPORAL
STATIONS OTHER L-Z LINEAGE SIZE CHARTS BATTLES OTHER PEOPLE SCI-TECH STYLING POLITICS TEMP. SHIPS
ARTICLES REVIEWS LISTS RECREATION SEARCH SITE GUIDE WHAT'S NEW MAIL AUTHOR LINKS-AWARDS SHOPS FORUM
Federation
Technology
Ablative
Armour
Antigrav
Units
Communication
Devices

Computers

Exocomps
Force
Fields
Genesis
Device
Holographic
Technology
Impulse
Engines
Medical
Technology
Navigational
Deflectors
Particle
Fountain

Particles

Replicators
Soliton
Wave Drive
Sonic
Shower
Stellar
Cartography
Stellar
Re-Ignition

Terraforming
Tractor
Beams

Transporters

Tricorders
Universal
Translator
Warp
Drive
Warp
Scales

Miscellaneous

Androids
Cloaking
Device

Cloning
Co-axial
Warp Core

Comets

Cryostasis
D'Arsay
Archive
Dimensional
Shift
Guardian
of Forever
Iconian
Gateway
Neutron
Stars
Null Space
Catapult
Orbital
Tether
Parallel
Dimensions
Planetary
Classes
Planetary
Collision
Preserver
Cannon
Psionic
Resonator
Quantum
Slipstream Drive
Spatial
Anomalies
Special
Powers
Subspace
Amplifier
Subspace
Phenomena

Trajector

Transwarp
Underspace
Corridor

Vaal
Verteron
Array
Vision
Augmentation

Wormholes
Additional
Sci-Tech

All Books

Title : Star Trek Chronology: The History of the Future
Writers : Denise Okuda, Michael Okuda
Year : 1993
Rating : 3.5000 for 2 reviewsAdd your own review
Reviewer : Greg Janesch Rating : 3
Review : This compliments such books as the encyclopedia by listing everything in chronological order. They do need a new one, though; it's 12 years out of date.
Reviewer : ASR Rating : 4
Review : Where to start... With the total, utter and complete deterioration of any coherent timeline with the careless anachronisms of Enterprise, I often look at this book and sigh. A coherent, believable progression from Eugenics Wars to Warp Drive to Federation, a suggestion that early space travel was much different than life on a twenty-third or twenty-forth century starship- this is what the chronology offered. In every particular, the Chronology agrees with established (pre-Voyager) canon, and, more importantly, with the vision of Trek. I was against Enterprise because I knew that the creaters (B&B) were too lazy to follow this timeline, and most definitely too lazy to make up a better one.
Add your own review

Copyright Graham Kennedy Page views : 1,377 Last updated : 1 Jan 1970