Upgraded Akira QT boat
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Ships like the akira should never have less then a thousand torps on them. AT ANY TIME!
Didn't the Refit-Connie have 250 pts? It seems very silly that a ship one third the size can carry the same number of PTs as a GCS.
Personally I don't see the Akira fitting in 5 RFQTLs. But, I would like to see all 15 of her tubes upgraded to pulse fire QTLs. As for the Nebula class. Now on that I would see Rapid Fire QTLs. 2 forward, 2 aft. Upgrade to some type XII phasers! And for sanity sake, someone put some armour on that ship!
Didn't the Refit-Connie have 250 pts? It seems very silly that a ship one third the size can carry the same number of PTs as a GCS.
Personally I don't see the Akira fitting in 5 RFQTLs. But, I would like to see all 15 of her tubes upgraded to pulse fire QTLs. As for the Nebula class. Now on that I would see Rapid Fire QTLs. 2 forward, 2 aft. Upgrade to some type XII phasers! And for sanity sake, someone put some armour on that ship!
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 4042
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:58 am
- Location: Right here.
Akira with 15 pulse fire QTL: 3234
Almost as good as 5 Rapic fire version
Almost as good as 5 Rapic fire version
"If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wonderous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross... but it's not for the timid." Q, Q Who
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
If one rapid fire QTL goes down then you are in trouble. You just lost a quarter of your fire power. But, if you keep the akira tubes where they are now and just upgrade them. The loss of a single PFQTL is not nearly as hurtful and they take up far less space. That and the RFQTLs would have a more limited field of fire.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 4042
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:58 am
- Location: Right here.
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
About 80 IIRC, I think it was mentioned during ST6.Deepcrush wrote:Didn't the Refit-Connie have 250 pts? It seems very silly that a ship one third the size can carry the same number of PTs as a GCS.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
I don't remember what they said in STVI, but I'm sure they did, given how important torpedoes are to the plot.
And 80 isn't quite so ridiculous a number for the refit Constitution. She has two slow-firing tubes. (Huh, DITL says four in yellow. Where the heck are the other two, and where in WOK were they shown?) She could flush that in 160 seconds, which is fast, but torpedoes seem to usually be used more precisely than just dumping them as fast as possible.
So if we go to the Type 3 burst fire on the Galaxy, we get 250 torps / 2 launchers / 2 torps / second = 62.5 seconds. Tsk.
To put the Galaxy at the same flush speed, there should be 640 torpedoes on board (160 seconds * 2 torpedoes/second * 2 launchers).
And 80 isn't quite so ridiculous a number for the refit Constitution. She has two slow-firing tubes. (Huh, DITL says four in yellow. Where the heck are the other two, and where in WOK were they shown?) She could flush that in 160 seconds, which is fast, but torpedoes seem to usually be used more precisely than just dumping them as fast as possible.
So if we go to the Type 3 burst fire on the Galaxy, we get 250 torps / 2 launchers / 2 torps / second = 62.5 seconds. Tsk.
To put the Galaxy at the same flush speed, there should be 640 torpedoes on board (160 seconds * 2 torpedoes/second * 2 launchers).
-
- Lieutenant Commander
- Posts: 1107
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 5:53 am
- Location: Somewhere in the universe
The other 2 were used in In A Mirror Darkly.Jordanis wrote:I don't remember what they said in STVI, but I'm sure they did, given how important torpedoes are to the plot.
And 80 isn't quite so ridiculous a number for the refit Constitution. She has two slow-firing tubes. (Huh, DITL says four in yellow. Where the heck are the other two, and where in WOK were they shown?) She could flush that in 160 seconds, which is fast, but torpedoes seem to usually be used more precisely than just dumping them as fast as possible.
So if we go to the Type 3 burst fire on the Galaxy, we get 250 torps / 2 launchers / 2 torps / second = 62.5 seconds. Tsk.
To put the Galaxy at the same flush speed, there should be 640 torpedoes on board (160 seconds * 2 torpedoes/second * 2 launchers).
There is not a problem in this world that can't be solved without the proper application of a sufficient number of thermonuclear ordnance.
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 4042
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:58 am
- Location: Right here.
It did, but perhaps the refit maintained the original underside-of-the-saucer PTLs of the basic Connie, giving it four. I'd guess that's what Graham was thinking, though we've never seen the refit fire from anywhere but the neck launcher and the refit saucer doesn't have visible torpedo ports (then again, the original didn't have these either - maybe it's covered by hull plates when not in operation?)
"If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wonderous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross... but it's not for the timid." Q, Q Who
- Graham Kennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Banbury, UK
- Contact:
The four tubes is based on a shot where we see a torpedo handling room in WoK, and on the wall there is a big sign saying "Torp Room 4"Jordanis wrote:I don't remember what they said in STVI, but I'm sure they did, given how important torpedoes are to the plot.
And 80 isn't quite so ridiculous a number for the refit Constitution. She has two slow-firing tubes. (Huh, DITL says four in yellow. Where the heck are the other two, and where in WOK were they shown?)
As for capacity, in ST VI when Kirk asks if they have fired torps at Gorkon's ship, we see Scotty checking a display that is listing the torps. I *think* was used that as the basis for our capacity, but it's rather speculative and I don't really remember to be honest.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
That answers that. I would have to assume, as The Hair postulates, that they kept the original launchers in the underside of the saucer. Actually a fair volley of tubes, for the day.GrahamKennedy wrote: The four tubes is based on a shot where we see a torpedo handling room in WoK, and on the wall there is a big sign saying "Torp Room 4"
This is what I figured it was based on. Perhaps someone should bust out their copy and look. I did it last time, for the STIV plastics debate.GrahamKennedy wrote: As for capacity, in ST VI when Kirk asks if they have fired torps at Gorkon's ship, we see Scotty checking a display that is listing the torps. I *think* was used that as the basis for our capacity, but it's rather speculative and I don't really remember to be honest.
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15368
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
I know this is just a what if but it goes along with one of my biggest pet peves. There are most likely numerous reasons why the Akiras cant be fitted with more of them. New tech that is still rather rear. High costs of production. Space on ship although that seems a pretty small problem.
But I admit if they just made a few fully QT Akiras and stationed them around Earth for those pesky Borg attack everyone could sleep a lot easier at night.
But I admit if they just made a few fully QT Akiras and stationed them around Earth for those pesky Borg attack everyone could sleep a lot easier at night.
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.