Star Wars Cloaking Devices On Film/TV

User avatar
DSG2k
Lieutenant jg
Lieutenant jg
Posts: 215
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 3:39 am
Contact:

Star Wars Cloaking Devices On Film/TV

Post by DSG2k »

Well, we've seen them in the canon now.

The following is based on a post I made to another board.

A ~135m long and roughly tubular-shape Republic prototype vessel is cloak-capable in the episode "Cat and Mouse"[TCW2]. The vessel's volume is perhaps 4000 cubic meters given its length and slenderness (the design reminds one of the Discovery from 2001), implying that it may not be significantly more voluminous than the Falcon or Twilight. This may suggest that length is somehow critical for cloaking, given that no ship as small as the Falcon is supposed to have a cloaking device per Needa in the original trilogy.

Regarding the capabilities of the cloak:

a. No visual distortion, even when touched on the hull by a Jedi hand.

b. No detection by Separatist ships (including Munificents, a Providence, and Trade Federation battleships) using standard scanning despite a hull-grazing pass of a Munificent. Even when the presence of the cloaked ship was known and the vessel had recloaked, scanning was ineffective until Separatist Admiral Trench's magnetic signature trick was employed. After that they had the ship on sensors without difficulty.

c. The ship cannot fire any weapons while cloaked, including "torpedoes and anti-aircraft cannons". When preparing to decloak and fire torpedoes, mixed within the torpedo firing prep lines was a note about diverting power. This may imply that Star Wars cloaks can't fire due to cloaking device power drain.

d. When detection was feared due to a close pass by fighters and bombers, Anakin ordered all systems and engines powered down save for the cloak, implying the possibility of some sort of signal leakage when these systems were functioning.

e. Cloak activation/deactivation requires only a couple of seconds, involving a luminous blue sparkly-bolt effect like electric arcs over the hull. However, after cloak deactivation, 15-35 seconds is apparently required to reactivate the cloak, at least after firing a full four-tube torpedo volley (it was 35 the first time, 15 the second).

f. Per Admiral Trench, any stealth ship could pass the Separatist blockade easily. This strongly suggests that cloaking devices are both rare (otherwise no one would bother to try to blockade) and rather effective (otherwise they'd be able to detect them readily).

And, though I neglected to mention it in the other post, yes you can see out from inside the cloak.

The Separatist admiral had used "tracking torpedoes" to destroy cloaked cruisers in prior engagements, but he'd only had a few engagements with cloaked ships, and the description suggests these ships were large cloaked vessels. All signs point to cloaking being sufficiently rare that these battles were few and far between.

His use of tracking torpedoes to destroy cloaked ships seemed confusing to the Republic, which apparently never determined how he did it until now (the magnetic signature issue that Anakin guessed).

So, now we've seen it. Thoughts and impressions?
Aaron
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
Contact:

Re: Star Wars Cloaking Devices

Post by Aaron »

Wait...they got spotted by a high tech MAD?

My gawd that is sad.
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: Star Wars Cloaking Devices

Post by Captain Seafort »

It might be a characteristic of the specific design - it's clearly a different type of cloak to those previously observed, given that it can't use weapons but can use sensors. I haven't seen the ep in question, but it may be that whatever was used to detect it became SOP in the Imperial Navy to the extent that it ceasing being considered a "proper" cloak.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Aaron
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
Contact:

Re: Star Wars Cloaking Devices

Post by Aaron »

It would make some sense given the others were "double blind" IIRC. I find it odd though that the Republic never picked up on it during testing, nor had means to reduce it.

Must be that "no war for a thousand years" BS thats used to explain away the foolish PT ground kit designs.
User avatar
DSG2k
Lieutenant jg
Lieutenant jg
Posts: 215
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 3:39 am
Contact:

Re: Star Wars Cloaking Devices

Post by DSG2k »

We've never observed cloaks in the Lucas canon before, so there's actually nothing to compare it to. The EU is a separate universe, so naturally its technology can be different. (If you wanna argue that, go start another thread.)

Anyway . . .

In this episode, there is no suggestion of other types of cloaking device or other capabilities of different ship cloaks, given that the "high-tech MAD" trick worked against other cloaked vessels previously in engagements between Trench and unknown assailants, and the fact that Trench penetrated them was known but his method was mysterious to the Republic. It was only Anakin's guess that it was magnetics, and it happened to be correct.

Whether future cloaks will share that weakness is unclear, but we didn't get any word suggesting they were going to do anything (or be able to do anything) about it. But, then, cloaking device tech has a way of getting inflated by writers given enough time, so we'll see what happens.
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Re: Star Wars Cloaking Devices

Post by Sionnach Glic »

The canon discussion has been relocated to here. Let's just say that I've got a feeling that'll be a long debate.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Star Wars Cloaking Devices

Post by Deepcrush »

Rochey, you should move DSG2k's first line as well since its the seed for the new thread. Otherwise you risk a cross over.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: Star Wars Cloaking Devices

Post by Captain Seafort »

It wouldn't make any sense in the other thread, so best left here. Keep all other canon stuff in the other thread please gents.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Star Wars Cloaking Devices

Post by Deepcrush »

Its not going to happen... besides it would work in the other thread as he's saying that canon isn't canon unless its canon he likes. Its perfect for the other thread.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
RK_Striker_JK_5
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 13029
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Location: New Hampshire
Contact:

Re: Star Wars Cloaking Devices

Post by RK_Striker_JK_5 »

"No ship that small has a cloaking device!" Also, Maul's ship had one too.
Aaron
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
Contact:

Re: Star Wars Cloaking Devices

Post by Aaron »

RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:"No ship that small has a cloaking device!" Also, Maul's ship had one too.
Eh?
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: Star Wars Cloaking Devices

Post by Captain Seafort »

Deepcrush wrote:Its not going to happen... besides it would work in the other thread as he's saying that canon isn't canon unless its canon he likes. Its perfect for the other thread.
:whistle:

Now can people please keep cloaking stuff in this thread and canon stuff in the other one.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
RK_Striker_JK_5
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 13029
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Location: New Hampshire
Contact:

Re: Star Wars Cloaking Devices

Post by RK_Striker_JK_5 »

Cpl Kendall wrote:
RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:"No ship that small has a cloaking device!" Also, Maul's ship had one too.
Eh?
He posted:
DSG2k wrote:We've never observed cloaks in the Lucas canon before, so there's actually nothing to compare it to. The EU is a separate universe, so naturally its technology can be different. (If you wanna argue that, go start another thread.)
And I am disputing such a claim.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Star Wars Cloaking Devices

Post by Deepcrush »

Captain Seafort wrote:
Deepcrush wrote:Its not going to happen... besides it would work in the other thread as he's saying that canon isn't canon unless its canon he likes. Its perfect for the other thread.
:whistle:

Now can people please keep cloaking stuff in this thread and canon stuff in the other one.
Dude, as long as its here. Its going to be a point of conflict. There's no way around it.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: Star Wars Cloaking Devices

Post by Captain Seafort »

I can try.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Locked