How Would You Have Written Enterprise's Final Episode

Enterprise
Aaron
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
Contact:

Re: How Would You Have Written Enterprise's Final Episode

Post by Aaron »

Rochey wrote:While they have greater speed, there's one difference:
The Federation goes looking for these anomalies. The Empire doesn't give a damn about them.
If the Empire knew in advance about the wormhole and set out to find it, then they'd certianly get there first. But in a situation where neither side knows about it, I'd give it to the Feds.
It really depends on where the wormhole is. Remember that the Bajoran hole was discovered by accident and the Barzan one was apparently discovered by the Barzans. If it popped up in a heavily travelled part of Federation space than they may discover it but their limited by the (relatively) short range of their sensors and generally poor fleet coverage.

The Empire has large portions of it's space patrolled or monitored and provided it popped up in the Core or Colonies region than they would likely know shortly, especially if it was close to a hyperspace lane. Out in the Rim or Unknown Regions than it may go unoticed for years.

Of course if the Feds find it, it may take months to get an expediation together to go through. Once again limited by their slow speed and comms.
Aaron
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
Contact:

Re: How Would You Have Written Enterprise's Final Episode

Post by Aaron »

Captain Seafort wrote:
I'm not talking about speed, but the fact that the Empire spans a galaxy, while the Federation only spans a fraction of one quadrant - if a wormhole is equally likely to appear anywhere in the galaxy, the Feds would only have a small chance of it appearing in their territory, while for the Empire it would be almost certain.
And if it shows up in Chiss, CSA, or Hapan space than it's the same deal. Their all technological equals to the Empire.
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Re: How Would You Have Written Enterprise's Final Episode

Post by Sionnach Glic »

Good points.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY
Contact:

Re: How Would You Have Written Enterprise's Final Episode

Post by stitch626 »

It also depends on the size of the galaxy. For all we know the Star Wars galaxy could be 1/4 the size of ours or 4 times the size of ours.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Re: How Would You Have Written Enterprise's Final Episode

Post by Sionnach Glic »

IIRC, it's twice the size of ours and has two satalite galaxies.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY
Contact:

Re: How Would You Have Written Enterprise's Final Episode

Post by stitch626 »

Oh. Wow, it has way too few planets.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Re: How Would You Have Written Enterprise's Final Episode

Post by Sionnach Glic »

Why too few? I don't think there was any real statement as to how many planets there were.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15368
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: How Would You Have Written Enterprise's Final Episode

Post by Teaos »

No but it implied by the number of species and by the fact that when someone mentions a planet most people know where and what it is. Hard to do that with lots of planets.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Re: How Would You Have Written Enterprise's Final Episode

Post by Sionnach Glic »

Where'd you get that from?
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
Aaron
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
Contact:

Re: How Would You Have Written Enterprise's Final Episode

Post by Aaron »

stitch626 wrote:Oh. Wow, it has way too few planets.
Umm, no. The Empire controlled a million worlds and 50 million colonies. The PT/OT however only concerned itself with a few of them, it would be incredibly difficult and expensive to portray more than what we got. The Clone Wars cartoon shows quite a bit more and the live action next year should show us a fair bit as well.
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY
Contact:

Re: How Would You Have Written Enterprise's Final Episode

Post by stitch626 »

Its estimated that our galaxy has a billion stars (rough estimate) and a few billion planets. So one million planets is not that impressive, especially for such a power hungry... um, empire as the Empire.
And don't bother mentioning planet habitality, Scifi stomps over that all the time.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: How Would You Have Written Enterprise's Final Episode

Post by Mikey »

stitch626 wrote:Its estimated that our galaxy has a billion stars (rough estimate) and a few billion planets. So one million planets is not that impressive, especially for such a power hungry... um, empire as the Empire.
And don't bother mentioning planet habitality, Scifi stomps over that all the time.
Without getting on the topic of how many systems have habitable planets, there is the idea that out of those "few billion planets" usually only will be habitable in each system - which much of sci-fi does posit. So, out of that few billion, how many true, population-containing worlds would there be? One out of ten on average?
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: How Would You Have Written Enterprise's Final Episode

Post by Tsukiyumi »

Mikey wrote:
stitch626 wrote:Its estimated that our galaxy has a billion stars (rough estimate) and a few billion planets. So one million planets is not that impressive, especially for such a power hungry... um, empire as the Empire.
And don't bother mentioning planet habitality, Scifi stomps over that all the time.
Without getting on the topic of how many systems have habitable planets, there is the idea that out of those "few billion planets" usually only will be habitable in each system - which much of sci-fi does posit. So, out of that few billion, how many true, population-containing worlds would there be? One out of ten on average?
With a few billion planets, one out of ten would mean several hundred million population-containing worlds. Not counting the ones you could use terraforming or just plain old-fashioned harsh-environment colonization on (domed habitats, underground tunnels/mines, etc).
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15368
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: How Would You Have Written Enterprise's Final Episode

Post by Teaos »

I have been reading lattly that people are questioning the Drake equation. They think he greatly over estimates the amount of M class planets they hold intelligent life. They think intelligence is not nearly as common as he proposed.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY
Contact:

Re: How Would You Have Written Enterprise's Final Episode

Post by stitch626 »

Well, considering that there isn't intellegent life on this planet... :D
Anyway, I would argue with his theories. Because I feel like it. And I disagree with him. And I don't like his name. Wow, I can't believe I just typed that, I'm tired.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
Post Reply