The new Timeline

Discussion of the new run of Star Trek XI+ movies and any spinoffs
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

The new Timeline

Post by Graham Kennedy »

Okay, so this thread is here to summarise and explain how the timeline changed as a result of Nero. Basically to come up with plausible reasons why things panned out the way they did.

First, and most obviously, the ships seem much more advanced looking in XI than they did in TOS. Sleeker, much closer to the TMP ideal but decades before that time. They are also apparently much larger - if the nEnt really is 3,000 feet then it's almost 30 times the volume of the original ship, and something like three times the size of a Galaxy class. They also seem to be far, far faster, though I am a little dubious on this point given just how damn fast they seem to be.

So I would suggest that the loss of the Kelvin was something of a watershed moment for Starfleet. They seem to know - or assume - that the mystery ship was Romulan. So they must have presumed that the Romulans had gained some massive technological and industrial edge, and responded by massively ramping up the size and capability of their own ships. The 2250s fleet is therefore the result of over twenty years of what is essentially a massive arms race that didn't previously happen.

Starfleet also seems to be rather less choosy than before. This is hard to judge because it's based more on what we saw in TNG than TOS, but in TNG you had to be the very best of the best to even get into the academy - remember Wesley going through extensive testing for that, and only one of four or so finalists got in? Or look to TOS, where Commodore Stone said "Not one man in a million could do what you and I have done - command a starship." Contrast that with XI where getting into the academy is a matter of turning up and getting on the shuttle, where he practically guarantees Kirk a command of his own within four years of graduating. Admittedly Kirk had "off the chart" scores on his aptitude tests, but still! There's also the fact that you can and Kirk did graduate a year early, something we have never heard of before.

And indeed we see that not only are they willing to graduate Kirk a year early, but they are also willing to plant him directly into the Big Chair of the fleet flagship.

I'd suggest part of Starfleet's buildup was to expand recruitment greatly. The huge new ships must have required huge crews - the nEnt is certainly far busier than the TOS one was - and filling the officer and enlisted posts alike must have been a nightmare. So they seem to be rather more accepting of recruits; I'm not suggesting they let literally anybody in, but pretty much any reasonably qualified person. What certainly seems true is that if you are good at the job you are fast tracked to an almost incredible degree.

Any other thoughts?
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
Lt. Staplic
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 8094
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 3:25 am
Commendations: Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Location: Somewhere Among the Stars
Contact:

Re: The new Timeline

Post by Lt. Staplic »

wow...I'm impressed.
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.
Lazar
Captain
Captain
Posts: 2232
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:29 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: The new Timeline

Post by Lazar »

GrahamKennedy wrote:They are also apparently much larger - if the nEnt really is 3,000 feet then it's almost 30 times the volume of the original ship, and something like three times the size of a Galaxy class.
Wait, what? I thought stuff like the bridge window shot, the shuttlebay shot, the docking ports and the TMP-style window rows on the saucer indicates that it's about the same size as the original.
"There was also a large horse in the room, taking up most of it."
User avatar
LaughingCheese
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 1001
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 6:57 am

Re: The new Timeline

Post by LaughingCheese »

Lazar wrote:
GrahamKennedy wrote:They are also apparently much larger - if the nEnt really is 3,000 feet then it's almost 30 times the volume of the original ship, and something like three times the size of a Galaxy class.
Wait, what? I thought stuff like the bridge window shot, the shuttlebay shot, the docking ports and the TMP-style window rows on the saucer indicates that it's about the same size as the original.
Similar features yes, but on a much larger scale; apparently sources are emerging with the new dimensions. Not sure I like it. Oh well. :?

Also, can someone please tell me why there were multiple cores?!?! Or what they thought of that?
Lazar
Captain
Captain
Posts: 2232
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:29 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: The new Timeline

Post by Lazar »

LaughingCheese wrote:Similar features yes, but on a much larger scale; apparently sources are emerging with the new dimensions. Not sure I like it. Oh well. :?
Did I miss something? How did the ship suddenly become 1 km long? If you look at the shot of the shuttlecraft entering the hangar bay, for example, it looks pretty much the same as TMP in terms of dimensions.
"There was also a large horse in the room, taking up most of it."
Lazar
Captain
Captain
Posts: 2232
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:29 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: The new Timeline

Post by Lazar »

Apparently the source of this (insane) number is a comment that the visual effects supervisor made in some interview. Maybe he misspoke and turned "300 meters" into "3 000 feet". (Offhand comments, and even production notes, are not traditionally considered canon.) But going by the movie, I see no indication that the ship is that size. Look at the shot of the shuttles entering the hangar bay, look at the shot of the bridge window, look at the elements that were ripped exactly or nearly exactly from TMP (the saucer section rim, the docking ports, the torpedo launcher area, the phaser banks); there's no way that the ship is 1 km long.
"There was also a large horse in the room, taking up most of it."
User avatar
LaughingCheese
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 1001
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 6:57 am

Re: The new Timeline

Post by LaughingCheese »

Lazar wrote:Apparently the source of this (insane) number is a comment that the visual effects supervisor made in some interview. Maybe he misspoke and turned "300 meters" into "3 000 feet". (Offhand comments, and even production notes, are not traditionally considered canon.) But going by the movie, I see no indication that the ship is that size. Look at the shot of the shuttles entering the hangar bay, look at the shot of the bridge window, look at the elements that were ripped exactly or nearly exactly from TMP (the saucer section rim, the docking ports, the torpedo launcher area, the phaser banks); there's no way that the ship is 1 km long.
Believe me, I hope you're right!! :lol:
User avatar
SuperSaiyaMan12
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts: 760
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:41 pm
Location: Auburn
Contact:

Re: The new Timeline

Post by SuperSaiyaMan12 »

Personally, I prefer the larger Enterprise. Since this still takes place in the continuity of Star Trek: Enterprise, jumping from a 225 meter ship to a 757/914 meter ship shows a gap in the decades.
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: The new Timeline

Post by Mark »

What I picked up on, most noticeably was the age thing. Assuming Kirk was 18 when he joined the Academy (which has always been standard), then he made Captain at 21, SIGNIFICANTLY younger than in the original time line , which also bypassed his experiences with Finney on the Republic, Garrovick on the Farragut, and Gary Mitchell must be alive and well SOMEWHERE....

Somehow, Chekov earned a commission and the rank of Ensign at 17??? To me THAT'S a big, WTF...........as the ages don't add up. If he was 34 in TOS when Chekov was 22, Kirk would have had to be 29 in the movie...............does THAT jive?

And it seems Sulu skipped his stint in science and went straight to the helm..........but I can accept that with GKs theory of a more tactical Starfleet.

And it seems Pike got A WHOLE LOT luckier in THIS time line as well.

And I guess Robert April was completely written out of the story, although granted, he was never completely cannon anyway.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Re: The new Timeline

Post by Graham Kennedy »

No, actually those ages are off. Nero waited 25 years for Spock to emerge from the black hole, which happened 3 years after Kirk enlisted. So Kirk enlisted at 22, not 17, and graduated at 25.

As for the sizes, I've said on another thread I am reluctant to accept them myself. But the VFX people are apparently claiming the new Enterprise is much larger than the original. Either way, it's certainly a much more crowded ship.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Re: The new Timeline

Post by Sionnach Glic »

Chekov being 17 is actualy quite interesting. He seems to have actualy graduated the Academy, despite being so young. If we take Pike's four years comment, then that means that Chekov enrolled at the age of 13!

Regarding the size of the nEnterprise, I'm just going by the creator's claims until I see a comparison done.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: The new Timeline

Post by Mark »

GrahamKennedy wrote:No, actually those ages are off. Nero waited 25 years for Spock to emerge from the black hole, which happened 3 years after Kirk enlisted. So Kirk enlisted at 22, not 17, and graduated at 25.

As for the sizes, I've said on another thread I am reluctant to accept them myself. But the VFX people are apparently claiming the new Enterprise is much larger than the original. Either way, it's certainly a much more crowded ship.

:bangwall: I forgot about that 25 year wait.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Re: The new Timeline

Post by Graham Kennedy »

One of the benefits of having seen it six times :)
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
User avatar
LaughingCheese
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 1001
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 6:57 am

Re: The new Timeline

Post by LaughingCheese »

GrahamKennedy wrote:One of the benefits of having seen it six times :)
LOL.

Did they have like a "25 years later" kind of thing?

All I remember was "3 Years Later." :?
User avatar
Bryan Moore
Captain
Captain
Posts: 2729
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 4:39 am
Location: Perpetual Summer Camp
Contact:

Re: The new Timeline

Post by Bryan Moore »

How can it be that big? Look at it in the ship yards. 3000 feet?!
Don't you hear my call, though you're many years away, don't you hear me calling you?
Post Reply