Star Trek XI

Discussion of the new run of Star Trek XI+ movies and any spinoffs

Do you think that it's a good idea for Trek XI to be set in TOS era?

Yes, it's a good a time as any.
6
11%
No, it should have been set in some other period.
14
26%
I'll watch it before I pass judgement.
30
57%
They should stop making Star Trek for a while.
3
6%
 
Total votes: 53
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Star Trek XI

Post by Deepcrush »

Oddly enough, the Arizona Memorial is a very popular attraction with tourists from Japan.
Many of Japanese, including my Uncle Kyetsu (I think thats how you spell it, I always called him Uncle Ray because none of us could say his name right) who talked about how it reminds him even the greatest can fall. He always talked about being in flames and how new family must sometimes fight in order to come together. Its a lot of deep stuff but I think you might have to be Japanese to understand it.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Aaron
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
Contact:

Re: Star Trek XI

Post by Aaron »

Captain Seafort wrote:
He was First Lord of the Admiralty, not 1SL, and he had a good few very good ideas. Even Gallpoli was a good idea as first conceived.
Ahh, thanks for the correction. As I recall he had a bizzare fascination for the Med and pushed for the Italian WWII campaign, which didn't go to well.
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Re: Star Trek XI

Post by Sionnach Glic »

Oh? Well, he must have been a formidable tactician then.
No, he wasn't really. His strength was in his charisma and personal strength. He convinced an entire nation that they could beat back the Nazis indefinitely.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: Star Trek XI

Post by Mark »

Deepcrush wrote:
Oddly enough, the Arizona Memorial is a very popular attraction with tourists from Japan.
Many of Japanese, including my Uncle Kyetsu (I think thats how you spell it, I always called him Uncle Ray because none of us could say his name right) who talked about how it reminds him even the greatest can fall. He always talked about being in flames and how new family must sometimes fight in order to come together. Its a lot of deep stuff but I think you might have to be Japanese to understand it.
Very likely. My wife is Japanese, and when we saw Pearl Harbor (the movie) she ended up in tears, saying something about racial guilt. She had a great uncle (or something like that) on her father's side who died in the Pacific fighting against the US, so maybe that has something to do with it as well. I hate to admit being less than understanding, but I think you're right.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: Star Trek XI

Post by Captain Seafort »

Cpl Kendall wrote:As I recall he had a bizzare fascination for the Med
An understandable one, given that for most of the war it was the only theatre where British forces could take the war to the enemy.
and pushed for the Italian WWII campaign, which didn't go to well.
True, although that was, again due to his tendency to advocate taking the war to the enemy and exploit the success of the North African campaign. It did lead to the Italian armistice, but overall, as you say, didn't go at all well.

The effective failure of the campaign was mainly due to Hitler supporting Kesselring's plan of defending the peninsula as far south as possible with successive defensive lines, over Rommel's plan to withdraw as far north as possible while retaining a relatively short line, to avoid the risk of being outflanked by an amphibious landing. Anzio could have proved Rommel's fear justified, if it hadn't have been for the idiot in charge.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Aaron
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
Contact:

Re: Star Trek XI

Post by Aaron »

Captain Seafort wrote:
An understandable one, given that for most of the war it was the only theatre where British forces could take the war to the enemy.
True and I'm sure that he was looking post-war at what the Empire could keep a hold of.

True, although that was, again due to his tendency to advocate taking the war to the enemy and exploit the success of the North African campaign. It did lead to the Italian armistice, but overall, as you say, didn't go at all well.

The effective failure of the campaign was mainly due to Hitler supporting Kesselring's plan of defending the peninsula as far south as possible with successive defensive lines, over Rommel's plan to withdraw as far north as possible while retaining a relatively short line, to avoid the risk of being outflanked by an amphibious landing. Anzio could have proved Rommel's fear justified, if it hadn't have been for the idiot in charge.
Well one things for sure, there were more than enough fools to go around.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Star Trek XI

Post by Deepcrush »

A northern defensive wall would have been near unbreakable. If Germany had pulled all of its forces to the Alps and held the northern cup of Italy. I don't think the Allies would have been able too build a successful campaign. If the Gothic Line would have held and maybe been a little further up the Germans could have capped the allied advance and made the "Soft Underbelly" a lot harder then it already was.

Something like this would have broken what was left of British control in the war.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: Star Trek XI

Post by Captain Seafort »

Deepcrush wrote:A northern defensive wall would have been near unbreakable. If Germany had pulled all of its forces to the Alps and held the northern cup of Italy. I don't think the Allies would have been able too build a successful campaign. If the Gothic Line would have held and maybe been a little further up the Germans could have capped the allied advance and made the "Soft Underbelly" a lot harder then it already was.

Something like this would have broken what was left of British control in the war.
Rommel was talking about a retreat to what became the Gothic line, not the Alps - any further north would have allowed an uncontested allied advance into France and the Balkans, rendering Anvil/Dragoon unnecessary. There's also the problem that the allies would, eventually, have broken through such a line, just as they eventually did at Cassino, but without the strategic depth to withraw to another defensive position further up the peninsula, as Kesselring's strategy allowed for.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Re: Star Trek XI

Post by Graham Kennedy »

Churchill was a horrible tactician and a horrible human being in many ways.

What he did have, however, was two things. An absolute determination to stay the course irregardless of the cost, and an incredible ability to motivate others to do the same. Which is exactly what was needed at the time.

For those who don't know, it's hard to understand how close this country came to losing World War II. At one point we were pretty much defeated on all fronts. The army was in disarray; it had most of its men intact, but so little equipment that most of them didn't even have rifles, let alone tanks and such. Hell, at the lowest ebb we only had two weeks worth of food left. Meanwhile an army that was probably one of the best equipped in the world and which had just conquered most of Europe had us next on its list of places to invade. People were openly talking about how much we would have to give up if we sued for peace, because it just looked like we couldn't win.

Churchill came in and said to hell with that; he would rather fight and lose than compromise, because he saw the people we were up against as being genuinely evil (which they were). When everyone else was mired in disasters and problems, he would ask his military leaders to present him with the one thing they would most need in order to be able to go on the offensive. When everyone else was talking about giving up, he said it plainly :

"We shall go on to the end. We shall fight in France, we shall fight on the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air. We shall defend our Island, whatever the cost may be. We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender."

For all his faults, if it wasn't for Churchill my country might well not exist today. In fact the whole of Europe might well look a great deal different.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Star Trek XI

Post by Deepcrush »

Ok, good point. But then the German forces still should have pulled back there to begin with. A solid line would have tied up allied forces and shorten the German supply lines.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: Star Trek XI

Post by Mark »

Plus, they should have left Russia alone. They had allies, but then the turned on them as well. I read this book once written by David Eddings where a character said "only an idoit fights a war on two fronts, but only a madman tries to fight one on three. I'll go as far as idiocy, but the world has had enough of madmen"
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: Star Trek XI

Post by Captain Seafort »

Deepcrush wrote:Ok, good point. But then the German forces still should have pulled back there to begin with. A solid line would have tied up allied forces and shorten the German supply lines.
Kesselring considered the longer supply lines and the risk of being outflanked worth it to have decent strategic depth. Given that he was able to hold of 15th AG for the best part of two years, and specifically was able to resume the defensive on the Gothic Line after the retreat from Cassino, I'd say he was right.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Star Trek XI

Post by Deepcrush »

Conceeded.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Star Trek XI

Post by Mikey »

Don't forget a horrible painter and a formidable wit. For those unfamiliar with the latter, it was Churchill who had the following dialogue with a lady at a dinner party, when she commented on his table manners:

woman: "If you were my husband, I'd put poison in your tea."

Churchill: "If I was your husband, I'd drink it."
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Re: Star Trek XI

Post by Sionnach Glic »

:lol:
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
Post Reply