STVI Questions

The Original Series
Captain Picard's Hair
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 4042
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:58 am
Location: Right here.

STVI Questions

Post by Captain Picard's Hair »

You know, it feels like it's been ages since I've started a Trek related thread. There was a time when about 537% of my posting was starting threads but lately I've gotten more mileage out of replying. On the other hand, I've been engaged in a broader range of more varied personal and political and other threads in that time also, and feel like I'm more "in the community" and a more colorful personality here than I may have been at first, so it all balances out.

Also, it's 3 am and I should be asleep.

But I digress...

Spock describes the neutron surge from Chang's BoP as "enormous." Granted that the BoP at the time was close enough to smell Kirk's underpants, but its clear that that cloak is at least partially transparent to the things neutron emissions, and the sensors on Starships are meant to be able to detect a fly from a thousand light years away. Couldn't Ent have triangulated the BoPs position from her neutron emissions? I know Kirk said that by the time they detect the neutrons "we're ashes," but I'm asking why.

And secondly if the torpedo actually worked by sniffing the BoPs tailpipe, why did it strike at the fore of the BoP rather than her aft?
"If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wonderous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross... but it's not for the timid." Q, Q Who
User avatar
kostmayer
Captain
Captain
Posts: 2812
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 11:08 am

Re: STVI Questions

Post by kostmayer »

Captain Picard's Hair wrote:And secondly if the torpedo actually worked by sniffing the BoPs tailpipe, why did it strike at the fore of the BoP rather than her aft?
Well, I don't think we actually saw the torpedo hit from the front, you just saw it approaching on the view screen - the viewscreen could have been showing a reverse angle.

Can't think of any reason why the radiation surge can't be detected from further away though.
"You ain't gonna get off down the trail a mile or two, and go missing your wife or something, like our last cook done, are you?"
"My wife is in hell, where I sent her. She could make good biscuits, but her behavior was terrible."
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: STVI Questions

Post by Captain Seafort »

The issue of the radiation surge can be explained by the inverse squared law. As you say, the BoP was right underneath the E-A - close enough that Kronos One's sensors couldn't differentiate the origin point of the torpedoes from the E-A's location. It was probably within a few metres of the hull, and given that most Trek battles occur at ranges of kilometres, the intensity of the surge at combat ranges would only be a fraction of that at the time of the Ktonos One attack.

As for the torpedo, it would have homed in on the exhaust from the direction it was launched from, including looking straight through the cloaked BoP.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Captain Picard's Hair
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 4042
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:58 am
Location: Right here.

Re: STVI Questions

Post by Captain Picard's Hair »

Captain Seafort wrote:The issue of the radiation surge can be explained by the inverse squared law. As you say, the BoP was right underneath the E-A - close enough that Kronos One's sensors couldn't differentiate the origin point of the torpedoes from the E-A's location. It was probably within a few metres of the hull, and given that most Trek battles occur at ranges of kilometres, the intensity of the surge at combat ranges would only be a fraction of that at the time of the Ktonos One attack.

As for the torpedo, it would have homed in on the exhaust from the direction it was launched from, including looking straight through the cloaked BoP.
I am well aware of the inverse square law, but sensor tech in Trek has detected fine details about ships from distances much greater than in the Khitomer battle. Even in Balance of Terror, the Enterprise tracked the destruction of Earth stations from across the sector.
"If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wonderous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross... but it's not for the timid." Q, Q Who
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: STVI Questions

Post by Captain Seafort »

Captain Picard's Hair wrote:I am well aware of the inverse square law, but sensor tech in Trek has detected fine details about ships from distances much greater than in the Khitomer battle. Even in Balance of Terror, the Enterprise tracked the destruction of Earth stations from across the sector.
How did they do it though? The BoT case, for example, could have been a case of assuming (reasonably, and correctly) that the stations had been destroyed when their transmissions (emergency beacons maybe) stopped. As for the others, a starship would reflect active sensors, unlike the BoP which would be detectable only by passive emissions, and doing all it could to minimise those emissions.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Aaron
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
Contact:

Re: STVI Questions

Post by Aaron »

Captain Seafort wrote: How did they do it though? The BoT case, for example, could have been a case of assuming (reasonably, and correctly) that the stations had been destroyed when their transmissions (emergency beacons maybe) stopped. As for the others, a starship would reflect active sensors, unlike the BoP which would be detectable only by passive emissions, and doing all it could to minimise those emissions.
That is exactly what happens. Spock tells Kirk over the chapel intercom that one of the outposts has gone silent.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: STVI Questions

Post by Mikey »

As to the angle of the torp's attack, Seafort's right - IR-guided air-to-air missiles don't always hit the target aircraft right in the afterburner.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Captain Picard's Hair
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 4042
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:58 am
Location: Right here.

Re: STVI Questions

Post by Captain Picard's Hair »

Very well, the distinction is noted and I suppose we can then take it as canon that the passive scanning capabilities of starships is limited.

If the torp detected the impulse emissions through cloaked ship, that'd be a cruel irony (to the Klingons)!
"If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wonderous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross... but it's not for the timid." Q, Q Who
Lazar
Captain
Captain
Posts: 2232
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:29 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: STVI Questions

Post by Lazar »

Now why is it that the torpedoes in STVI were able to penetrate shields?
"There was also a large horse in the room, taking up most of it."
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: STVI Questions

Post by Mikey »

If you're referring to Chang's BoP, IIRC Klingon and Romulan ships at that time couldn't have shields up while cloaked. When the de-cloaked, there was probably enough damage done to interfere with the shields.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Lazar
Captain
Captain
Posts: 2232
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:29 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: STVI Questions

Post by Lazar »

No, I mean the way that the Klingon torpedoes struck the Enterprise and the Excelsior directly on the hull, even though they made references to having shields up.
"There was also a large horse in the room, taking up most of it."
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: STVI Questions

Post by Mikey »

Oh. Dunno, then.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Lazar
Captain
Captain
Posts: 2232
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:29 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: STVI Questions

Post by Lazar »

It was probably because it looked much cooler than just having them bounce off the shields.
Last edited by Lazar on Sat Jan 10, 2009 7:56 pm, edited 3 times in total.
"There was also a large horse in the room, taking up most of it."
Sonic Glitch
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6026
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 2:11 am
Location: Any ol' place here on Earth or in space. You pick the century and I'll pick the spot

Re: STVI Questions

Post by Sonic Glitch »

Lazar wrote:No, I mean the way that the Klingon torpedoes struck the Enterprise and the Excelsior directly on the hull, even though they made references to having shields up.
"She's packing quite a wallop!" <-- The only explanation we ever got.
"All this has happened before --"
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: STVI Questions

Post by Captain Seafort »

Lazar wrote:No, I mean the way that the Klingon torpedoes struck the Enterprise and the Excelsior directly on the hull, even though they made references to having shields up.
Simple - they were hitting hull-hugging shields, not the hull. Note that through most of the battle only superficial external damage was visible, and it was only after Scotty's warning that the shields were collapsing that serious structural damage occured - the torp that punched a hole through the saucer.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Post Reply