Morning rant on ST 11

Discussion of the new run of Star Trek XI+ movies and any spinoffs
Post Reply
Capt. Jethro
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts: 531
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 9:25 pm
Location: East TN, or above FL 180, Mach .80

Morning rant on ST 11

Post by Capt. Jethro »

I may be going out on a limb with this and it may have already been discussed.

From what I've been hearing ST 11 will involve time travel. Not that this is new to the ST universe. With this in mind so far we know that 'The Shat' will not be in the movie. Bummer if you ask me. But since the movie involves time travel why could they not have Kirk in a cameo. For example if Kirk has been injured in the past and did not become a legend why not show him in a scene where he is kind of like Boothby working on a ranch (if they have one) at Star Fleet Academy. Some sort of interaction between him and the older Spock (Nimoy) would be interesting.

Cheers everyone!
American by birth, southern by the grace of God!
Aaron
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
Contact:

Re: Morning rant on ST 11

Post by Aaron »

Capt. Jethro wrote:I may be going out on a limb with this and it may have already been discussed.

From what I've been hearing ST 11 will involve time travel. Not that this is new to the ST universe. With this in mind so far we know that 'The Shat' will not be in the movie. Bummer if you ask me. But since the movie involves time travel why could they not have Kirk in a cameo. For example if Kirk has been injured in the past and did not become a legend why not show him in a scene where he is kind of like Boothby working on a ranch (if they have one) at Star Fleet Academy. Some sort of interaction between him and the older Spock (Nimoy) would be interesting.

Cheers everyone!
Didn't Shatner burn his bridges with Abrams over this? I recall an interview where Shatner claimed to be working with Abrams to see how he could fit in but it feel through. Honestly I'm glad he's not and I'd prefer Nimoy to miss out as well. ST is only going to survive if they reinvent the franchise and time travel is probably the most abused portion of that universe. We already know that the existing fans are not enough to keep it alive in it's current form and I really don't see how fanservice is going to bring in new viewers. Seriously, what is Nimoy known widely for but Spock?
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15368
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: Morning rant on ST 11

Post by Teaos »

I'm with Kendall, stop rehashing the old guys and move on, why not Shatter? Why not the rest of the crew? Or dont you want the Russian in it? Or the Gay guy? or the Black woman?

How about we get Riker in a cameo, he's been in almost everything else.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Capt. Jethro
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts: 531
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 9:25 pm
Location: East TN, or above FL 180, Mach .80

Re: Morning rant on ST 11

Post by Capt. Jethro »

Both of you make good points, but I wasn't aware of the fallout between Shatner and Abrams. But if they need to break away from the original cast then why did they cast Nimoy? You would think that Abrams could do a complete reboot or write something about their first mission together.
American by birth, southern by the grace of God!
User avatar
Nutso
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9637
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 9:58 pm

Re: Morning rant on ST 11

Post by Nutso »

Guess Nimoy is there to pass the torch...to the past. :roll:

Kirk passed the torch to Picard. Spock will pass the torch to...past Spock?
"Bible, Wrath of Khan, what's the difference?"
Stan - South Park
Aaron
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
Contact:

Re: Morning rant on ST 11

Post by Aaron »

Capt. Jethro wrote:Both of you make good points, but I wasn't aware of the fallout between Shatner and Abrams. But if they need to break away from the original cast then why did they cast Nimoy? You would think that Abrams could do a complete reboot or write something about their first mission together.
I think I answered that with my "fanservice" comment. There's really no other reason to cast him, other than to bring in the fanboys (the kind of people who would watch a two hour movie of a turd if it had a SF emblem). The guy is 77 years old and the last time I heard him speak he sounded like he was on the verge of death.

That said, I've heard it claimed that Nimoy doesn't get involved in a Trek production unless he thinks it's good. Apperently he turned down Generations, so this might be a good sign. But my distrust of Trek has crossed over into the "it'll suck" as a default. I'll certainly give it a fair shake when we see some trailers and more info but I'm not getting my hopes up.
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15368
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: Morning rant on ST 11

Post by Teaos »

From what I heard he turned down Generations becaus he was going to have a bit part, this time he is the main guy.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Morning rant on ST 11

Post by Mikey »

The problem is that there was resolution at the end of DS9 and VOY. ST films are always based on/drawn from the TV franchises, and there was nowhere to go from one any longer.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15368
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: Morning rant on ST 11

Post by Teaos »

But thats the great chance they have/had.

Do something totally new, in the "future" and if its a hit you can use it as a pilot.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Morning rant on ST 11

Post by Mikey »

I agree with you, Teaos. I wasn't saying that it's what should be done, I was saying is it happens to be how things are done. I personally would love to see a film which is the premier of a new franchise.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Aaron
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
Contact:

Re: Morning rant on ST 11

Post by Aaron »

Mikey wrote:I agree with you, Teaos. I wasn't saying that it's what should be done, I was saying is it happens to be how things are done. I personally would love to see a film which is the premier of a new franchise.
Indeed, the only sci-fi series that comes to mind that did that was Stargate. I want to say Battlestar Galactica as well but I can't remember if it came out as a TV movie or in theatre first.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Morning rant on ST 11

Post by Mikey »

Stargate was the only one I thought of... I thought oBSG was a TV pilot first.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15368
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: Morning rant on ST 11

Post by Teaos »

I cant recall any sci-fi that started as a movie but other genras have, M*A*S*H comes to mind.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Aaron
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
Contact:

Re: Morning rant on ST 11

Post by Aaron »

Mikey wrote:Stargate was the only one I thought of... I thought oBSG was a TV pilot first.
According to Wikipedia :roll: Saga of a Star World aired in Canada in theatres before the show aired but not in the US until after it started. Which is what I thought happened, I remember my father saying he saw it in theatre.
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Re: Morning rant on ST 11

Post by Graham Kennedy »

Cpl Kendall wrote:That said, I've heard it claimed that Nimoy doesn't get involved in a Trek production unless he thinks it's good.
I have one thing to say about that.

Leonard Nimoy was in Star Trek V.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
Post Reply