Sulu vs Chekov

The Original Series
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Sulu vs Chekov

Post by Mark »

Something has been confusing me for a while, and I thought maybe you guys could help clear this up for me. In TOS Sulu was a Lieutenant and Chekov was an Ensign

TMP saw them both promoted if I recall correctly

TWOK saw Chekov as a Lt. Commander and First Officer............wouldn't you have thought that Sulu would have gotten a XOs job before Chekov??? How did Chekov move ahead of Sulu??? This seemed confirmed as you'd need 3 senior officers to activate the self destruct on the E-nil. Sulu was sent to help McCoy and leaving Kirk, Scotty, and Chekov to activate the destruct. Then, in STV, Chekov was left in command of E-A when Sulu went with the away team. Then, when they returned to the ship, and Sulu began to enter their new heading Chekov told him "you have no authority", which, if he was the senior command officer on the bridge, he would I would assume.

So, at this point it looks as if Chekov outranks Sulu. Ok, I've seen some people get promoted over and past others. But now I get confused again. in STVI Sulu is now Captain of the most advanced and most powerful ship in Starfleet, and Chekov is still on E-A. Sulu never even had to serve as a first officer it seems.

How the hell can this be explained??

:?
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: Sulu vs Chekov

Post by Captain Seafort »

Just a convoluted promotion scheme I guess. Don't forget that the E-A was incredibly top-heavy rank-wise, so it's not a great example of Starfleet promotion procedures. Spock should certainly have had his own ship, Scotty and McCoy should have been running big shore institutions, and the rest of the senior staff should have been first officers. Sulu and Kirk were the only ones with a job suitable for their rank. As for the details, I think Chekov was command-track, while Sulu was "just" the helmsman - that would explain how Chekov got to be 2iC of Reliant while Sulu was still on the Enterprise, and how he apparently outranked Sulu in ST5. Alternatively, Sulu's posting in ST2 was as an Academy instructor, which may have been roughly equal to Chekov's in terms of pay grade, and Kirk put Chekov above him on the E-A because of Chekov's command experience.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15369
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: Sulu vs Chekov

Post by Teaos »

TWOK saw Chekov as a Lt. Commander and First Officer............wouldn't you have thought that Sulu would have gotten a XOs job before Chekov??? How did Chekov move ahead of Sulu???
It can makes sense since promotion isnt set in stone, you dont get a promotion every 7 years or whatever. You get them when you deserve them and they open up.

I dont really find this that hard to believe.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: Sulu vs Chekov

Post by Tsukiyumi »

Mark wrote:How did Chekov move ahead of Sulu???
Very carefully.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
User avatar
Grundig
Commander
Commander
Posts: 1310
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 7:19 am
Location: California, USA
Contact:

Re: Sulu vs Chekov

Post by Grundig »

I would have thought the writers would pay a little more attention to this. Cpt. Seafort's explanation makes sense to me, but in reality it seems like the writers were just flippant about these details because the two were secondary characters.

Edit: Fixed - I meant Seafort, not Kendall. All these 'captains' are making the forums as top-heavy as the E-A!
Last edited by Grundig on Wed Aug 27, 2008 3:45 pm, edited 2 times in total.
"I have nothing to say, I am saying it, and that is poetry."
John Cage
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15369
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: Sulu vs Chekov

Post by Teaos »

I would have thought the writers would pay a little more attention to this. Cpt. Kendall's explanation makes sense to me, but in reality it seems like the writers were just flippant about these details because the two were secondary characters.
When did Kendall post about this?
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
User avatar
Grundig
Commander
Commander
Posts: 1310
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 7:19 am
Location: California, USA
Contact:

Re: Sulu vs Chekov

Post by Grundig »

Fixed.
"I have nothing to say, I am saying it, and that is poetry."
John Cage
User avatar
Reliant121
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 12263
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm

Re: Sulu vs Chekov

Post by Reliant121 »

Tsukiyumi wrote:
Mark wrote:How did Chekov move ahead of Sulu???
Very carefully.
:lol: :Drool2: :bangwall:
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: Sulu vs Chekov

Post by Mark »

This is the last time I will try and make this post. Server wen't down twice already erasing my post.

I thought that Sulu WAS on the command track. After all he commanded Enterprise on more than one occasion, and even led her into that aborted battle with the Klingons. It was always my understanding that he was next in line after Scotty.

I suppose that he could have turned down a transfer to stay with Kirk, thus letting Chekov move ahead of him on the command track, but then why would he suddenly get command of Excelsior while Chekov went back to Navagator/Weapons.

Makes no sense to me.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: Sulu vs Chekov

Post by Tsukiyumi »

Reliant121 wrote:
Tsukiyumi wrote:
Mark wrote:How did Chekov move ahead of Sulu???
Very carefully.
:lol: :Drool2: :bangwall:
:P
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: Sulu vs Chekov

Post by Mark »

So then, Sulu's BEHIND Chekov??? They were pretty close you know. Who knows what happened when they were lost in the wilderness together that time in STV. :shock:
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
katefan
Lieutenant jg
Lieutenant jg
Posts: 358
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 7:15 am

Re: Sulu vs Chekov

Post by katefan »

If I recall correctly, the original ST II script was supposed to have a scene where Sulu talks about his upcoming command with Kirk in the travel pod on the way to Enterprise. In the scene he accidentally calls Kirk "captain" then hastily apologizes. Kirk smiles and says something along the lines that there was no way he could take offense to that. There were supposed to be numerous reasons why the scene was not used, among them Shatner's ego.

I recall a scene like that in the ST II book adaptation, but it has been many years since I read it.

So if the scene was actually supposed to happen Chekov and Sulu's respective positions would have made sense; Sulu was likely Enterprise's XO on his way to his own ship (it really was never specified who was second in command before Kirk took over).
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Re: Sulu vs Chekov

Post by Graham Kennedy »

Sulu was also meant to be the Excelsior's Captain in Star Trek III, which again didn't happen for whatever reason. We had to wait all the way until ST VI to finally see it.

I gather Takei lobbied like crazy to get a Captain Sulu movie or series made.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: Sulu vs Chekov

Post by Tsukiyumi »

GrahamKennedy wrote:I gather Takei lobbied like crazy to get a Captain Sulu movie or series made.
That could've been a lot cooler than Enterprise.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15369
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: Sulu vs Chekov

Post by Teaos »

Meh, it would hav been to much of the same stuff as TOS, its a new ship but same time period.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Post Reply