Biggest design flaws ever!

Everything else
Post Reply
mwhittington
Commander
Commander
Posts: 1313
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 4:49 pm
Location: Gridley, CA.

Re:

Post by mwhittington »

GrahamKennedy wrote:From a wonderfully weird little movie called "Battle Beyond the Stars".

Image

And this was a fighter. That looks like a cow.
Wow, a flying scrotum, who knew? :lol:
"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." -Benjamin Franklin-
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Re:

Post by Mikey »

mwhittington wrote:Wow, a flying scrotum, who knew? :lol:
Thought it. Didn't say it, but thought it.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15368
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: Biggest design flaws ever!

Post by Teaos »

If your piece looks like that I reccomend seeing a doctor ASAP.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Re: Biggest design flaws ever!

Post by Tsukiyumi »

Teaos wrote:If your piece looks like that I reccomend seeing a doctor ASAP.
Double the fun, huh? Yeah, I'd rather not be a mutant freak, personally.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15368
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: Biggest design flaws ever!

Post by Teaos »

Mutant freaks need lovin to...
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY
Contact:

Re: Biggest design flaws ever!

Post by stitch626 »

Oy...
Easy for tribbles, we're cute and cuddly (except to Klingons, ugh). :)
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Biggest design flaws ever!

Post by Mikey »

*ahem* speaking of design flaws, here's a doozy:

Image

The thing is not a permanent station, although it is large enough tp house 2 cruisers at each quadrant - the flaw being, it has no engines. It must be towed into battle.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Re: Biggest design flaws ever!

Post by Graham Kennedy »

Oh my, as a building it's lovely; as a ship, it's hideous.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
Blackstar the Chakat
Banned
Posts: 5594
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm

Re: Biggest design flaws ever!

Post by Blackstar the Chakat »

Now I love the Great Fox, the original Great Fox, but it does have it's flaws. It's only weapons are the two foward guns leaving her aft and flanks exposed. A weakness exposed when ambushed in Sector Z by a half-dozen copperhead missles. Whether its fighter squadren protects its flanks is up to you. Although she is tough, taking a direct hit and still flys to the Bolse station. It's not supposed to be in that kind of situation though, normally it is providing fire support from the sidelines or covered by the Cornarian Fleet. This weakness was also it's end in Star Fox Assault when the surviving ships of the Cornarian fleet were in retreat. Peppy, who was in command of the bridge at the time stayed as long as he could but the aparoids began infecting the Great Fox, severly damaging the hull before Peppy destroyed an aparoid base with the main guns and smashed through a shield, opening the way for the fighter squadren. The ship then exploded.

Image
Image
Monroe
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 5837
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:17 am

Re: Biggest design flaws ever!

Post by Monroe »

StarFox's ships aren't that bad. The Ar-wing (?) is a really nice looking practical craft and the carrier wouldn't be a bad escort corvette or maybe frigate in other universes. It looks like it can fly relatively fast and it can take a beating as you pointed out.
How many Minbari does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
None. They always surrender right before they finish the job and never tell you why.

-Remain Star Trek-
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Biggest design flaws ever!

Post by Mikey »

Does it fly with it's nose at a positive angle form horisontal, like a 'copter in reverse? I ask, because it look like there is a bit of an angle from the orientation of the nose to that of the guns by the hangar.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Re: Biggest design flaws ever!

Post by Sionnach Glic »

Mikey, the Ramilies Star Forts are meant to be permanent instalations. Numerous planets (usualy Hive Worlds, Forge Worlds or Fortress Worlds) have them emplaced as permanent orbital defences, and seeing as how they can take on a small fleet on their own, they're pretty potent weapons. IIRC, the reason they have warp drives is so they can be towed to the front line planets, to assist in defending them, but most appear to be permanently stationed around a planet (Cadia has four, for example, and I think Port Maw had a couple).
Graham wrote:Oh my, as a building it's lovely; as a ship, it's hideous.
Well, it is a giant floating space cathedral of doom. :)
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
Blackstar the Chakat
Banned
Posts: 5594
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm

Re: Biggest design flaws ever!

Post by Blackstar the Chakat »

Mikey wrote:Does it fly with it's nose at a positive angle form horisontal, like a 'copter in reverse? I ask, because it look like there is a bit of an angle from the orientation of the nose to that of the guns by the hangar.
No...I think that's just the angle the ship is at in the picture.
StarFox's ships aren't that bad. The Ar-wing (?) is a really nice looking practical craft and the carrier wouldn't be a bad escort corvette or maybe frigate in other universes. It looks like it can fly relatively fast and it can take a beating as you pointed out.
I'm not saying they're bad ships, and I love that there is an explination as to why the Arwing is better then the enemy ships. I'm just saying the Great Fox has a limited firing arc with it's only guns, which is a pretty big flaw considering how much James paid for it.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Biggest design flaws ever!

Post by Mikey »

GrahamKennedy wrote:Oh my, as a building it's lovely; as a ship, it's hideous.
As Rochey said, it IS a cathedral - any construction like this of the WH40k Imperium is meant as much as a shrine to/reminder of the divine might of the Emperor as a vessel of war.

Rochey: you'll have to forgive me, I'm going by the Lexicanum - the WH40k wiki. The article seems to indicate that the Ramilies is meant for main battle actions, just that it needs to be towed there. Personally, I'd leave about 16 in the Cadia system if they didn't take a few centuries to build.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Re: Biggest design flaws ever!

Post by Sionnach Glic »

No, the Lexicanum's wrong on that count. I have the BattleFleet Gothic: Armada ruelbook suplement, which gives the info on these things. They're purely defensive, designed with warp drives so they can keep up with the front lines and defend newly captured planets from counterattacks. Given that they can take on entire fleets and win, I'd say that it excells at that task.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
Post Reply