TR-116

[DBS]

True.

Now this seems as settled as it is going to get how will this thread mutate now?

This thread was about something?

Let's take this in a new direction (without getting off topic). We know that the TR-116 is deeply cool, and why it was designed. We know that officers towards the end of the DS9 series and later TNG movies know about the weapon. We also can think of situations that (given what we 21st century fools know) the TR-116 could perhaps have been used. SO WHY DOESN'T ANYONE USE IT

I'll take the most obvious (and easiest) two reasons, so we don't keep arguing back and forth about them.

1. The writers are idiots.

2. Everyone in Starfleet is an idiot. (except for the mass murderers, who are merely insane)

So other than those two "cop out" reasons, anyone have an idea of why it is not used?

[Captain Seafort]

I would say that the real question isn't "why isn't it used?", so much as "what is it used for?" The TR-116 is a sniper rifle - its in-built transporter and active-sensor-based scope make it all but useless in a combat environment where enemy jamming would be intense.. Moreover it uses subsonic rounds, which is highly unusual for such a large weapon. What would make sense given these facts would be if it was specifically designed for assassination. The transporter would make determining the origin point of the bullet impossible, and the sniper would not require line-of-sight to the target. He could be kilometres away, shoot, and bug out before local security could locate him.

[DBS]

I would say that the real question isn't "why isn't it used?", so much as "what is it used for?" The TR-116 is a sniper rifle - its in-built transporter and active-sensor-based scope make it all but useless in a combat environment where enemy jamming would be intense.. Moreover it uses subsonic rounds, which is highly unusual for such a large weapon. What would make sense given these facts would be if it was specifically designed for assassination. The transporter would make determining the origin point of the bullet impossible, and the sniper would not require line-of-sight to the target. He could be kilometres away, shoot, and bug out before local security could locate him.

Good point. So if I read that right, then your suggestion is that it isn't used because there haven't been many situations in which it actually be useful. Thanks!

[Sionnach Glic]

The transporter function could probably be stopped by multiple things (we've seen how plenty of stuff stop ships beaming down, and they likely have more powerfull transporters) and so might not be usefull on the battlefield. I can imagine once this weapon becomes widely know that the other powers begin employing jamming.

[DBS]

I'm pretty sure that the transporter was an add-on, but even so I think you are right, and there are probably proper defenses anyway. Transport inhibitors seem to be standard procedure for Federation and Klingon ground forces, at the very least.

[Captain Seafort]

I'm pretty sure that the transporter was an add-on.

It couldn't have been - the targeting system was looking through walls and such, and so must have been designed around a transporter-capable weapon. The mouse-type thing tht controled the targeting was part of the pistol-grip and so must have been part of the design from the outset. Therefore the transporter must also have been part of the design from the outset.

[DBS]

I may be mis-remembering the episode. I thought I remembered that the killer custom-modified a TR-116 for his purposes (precisely to confuse investigators). But I could easily be wrong. You certainly are right about how integrated the system was (so if they were added on he spent some time on it making it work).

[Sionnach Glic]

Perhaps the scope was also an add on?

<off-topic>
What the hell? Six pages?
How can we discuss so much about one weapon?

[DBS]

Perhaps the scope was also an add on?

<off-topic>
What the hell? Six pages?
How can we discuss so much about one weapon?

Possibly because it is so unusual for Trek (or sci-fi in general?) - and the idea is pretty interesting!

[Captain Seafort]

He didn't modify the the weapon, but selected an existing design that suited his purpose.

And we can't discuss the weapon so much. We can, however, get into completely off-topic discussions about Borg KE shields (or lack thereof).

[Captain Seafort]

He didn't modify the the weapon, but selected an existing design that suited his purpose.

And we can't discuss the weapon so much. We can, however, get into completely off-topic discussions about Borg KE shields (or lack thereof).

[Sionnach Glic]

Another double post?!
Whats going on people?

I don't recall the episode too well so I'll take your word on that.

And we can get into a disscusion about wether or not you can beam bombs into enemy ships.

[DBS]

Another double post?!
Whats going on people?

I don't recall the episode too well so I'll take your word on that.

And we can get into a disscusion about wether or not you can beam bombs into enemy ships.

I took the liberty of starting one in the Voyager section (called "beaming fun stuff onto enemy ships." Have fun! 8)

[Sionnach Glic]

Dear god man! Do you not realise what you have unleashed?

[Teaos]

To go for a reason that isn't "...is an idiot"

Maybe Starfleet command has to approve all weapons used by it's people and this weapon is still going through the red tape.

Also I think the scope was a add on.

Even if it wasn't it could just be to help you locate someone. Would come in handy even if you couldn't shot them at the time.