McAvoy wrote:11 carriers. There is even talk about decom the Enterprise now to reduce the fleet down to ten until the Ford is ready in 2015.
The Ford? Really? Is it going to be launched, or just fall down the stairs from dry dock?
McAvoy wrote:11 carriers. There is even talk about decom the Enterprise now to reduce the fleet down to ten until the Ford is ready in 2015.
That wouldn't stop a single Vor'Cha or Dominion Battlecruiser. Let alone an attack squadron.Tholian_Avenger wrote:That is what the Flotillas are for.
You imagine wrong. S31 can't be everywhere and predict everything. Besides, its not their job. That would be the job of SF-Intel.I imagine Section 31 would send them to the "hotspots" and they could give a decent advance warning.
Could is the key word in that. Could, means your enemy could get past you. Could reach your homeworld and could level it hours before your support arrives.The Garrison Fleets could be diverted if in need.
Give me half a dozen squadrons of Battlecruisers and a few attack wings of Bugs and I'll stalemate that fleet with ramming and flank attacks. In the meantime, one or two or three of my ships just leveled your capital.Don't you think having Fleet 1 waging war in your territory gives a nice mutually assured destruction feel to any attackers?
Yeah, that was the same feeling they had just before the Breen showed up.SFHQ must not suspect any big local war on the horizon or the superships wouldn't have been removed.
S31 might be a covert arm of SF Int, but it's more likely to be completely separate. Either way, it's best RL analogue is the CIA, not military intelligence.Tholian_Avenger wrote:I was under the impression that Section 31 was Starfleet Intelligence. So that is what I meant.
Starfleet was caught with it's pants down, but given the situation I'm prepared to give them the benefit of the doubt and put it down to poor decision making rather than outright incompetence. They probably had the fleet covering Earth positioned to intercept Dominion raiders rather than from the direction of Breen space, and there's the further strong possibility that the Breen have cloaking devices. Moreover, given the extremely limited damage inflicted, the Breen's heavy ships were probably intercepted and destroyed before they reached Earth, with only light forces actually attacking.The Breen: SF was at war and failed miserably to monitor its own territory for attack, to monitor the trade of its declared enemy (the Cardassian area), barely defended its home, and failed to launch a counter strike.
It will, however, be able to cover a large area against attackers. In your system, only your first and second fleets are strong enough to cope with a serious force.space is big and a 500 ship fleet won't be enough to keep an armada of Dyson Spheres from sneaking through a gap.
The Organians aren't the Federation's guardians - they're merely the enforcers of the Fed-Klingon peace. Moreover, that doesn't help those killed in an attack.In this timeframe we are left with an alien of the week or an unknown menace. We could just as easily go to the Organians and demand repayment for their poor stewardship in the latter case.
Bullshit. We have seen such tactics used or suggested precisely twice - "A Taste of Armageddon", in the far more militarised TOS-era, and Sisko's attack on the Maquis colony in "For the Uniform", which was conducted off his own bat without Starfleet authority. There has never been any indication of such indiscriminate attacks being sanctioned as a method of war by the Federation, and every indication (given their extreme pacifism) that they would avoid such tactics.We have seen these SF Captains, they are the most ruthless and immoral brigands this side of Orion, willing to use plagues, chemicals, and base delta zero. So if my Fleet 1 has a chance of luck or secrecy in its counterstrike, the repercussions could be nasty.
Wrong, by and large the advantage lies with the defender - they have shorter LOC, may be able to operate on interior lines, and have the morale advantage of fighting in defence of their homes. In Trek fleet combat, the side on the defensive has the additional advantage conferred by their "moving wall" formations, which allows much greater supporting fire to a ship on the defending side than the attackers'.As you know, the attacker always has the advantage
Agreed. We all go a little crazy now and then, especially when you find out your homeworld was just evaporated.Captain Seafort wrote:There has never been any indication of such indiscriminate attacks being sanctioned as a method of war by the Federation, and every indication (given their extreme pacifism) that they would avoid such tactics.
. . . precisely twice . . .
DS9 leaves no room for underestimation with it's fleet actions. Fleet 2 is a general reserve to respond to where needed. Against the large powers I envision a savage mauling on their midrange bases to allow the war footing to begin in earnest.1) you massively underestimate the number of ships available to the Federation by at least an order of magnitude and 2) you concentrate too much on the concept of a single knock-out blow and the defence of your core worlds (assuming thats what the 2nd Fleet is for).
You don't like my act of plot.The Organians aren't...
In the far more militarised TOS=era Federation, not the TNG-era Federation.Tholian_Avenger wrote:One of the two general exceptions to the Prime Directive is in cases where an extreme threat to the Federation exists. General Order 24 authorizes a Captain to order the destruction of an entire civilization under certain circumstances. Captain Garth of Izar on Antos IV and Captain James Kirk on Eminiar VII.
Genocide through omission, not by direct actionThere is the normal extinction complaint against the Prime Directive.
Targeted attacks against the command and control systems of a specific, known threat to the Federation, not an indiscriminate one.Captain Jean Luc Picard led the USS Enterprise-D (staffed by SF personnel) in developing a slow acting virus to destroy the Collective. IIRC, Admiral Necheyev condemns Picard for not doing this.
Admiral Kathryn Janeway infected the Borg Collective with a neurolytic pathogen, destroying the Unicomplex and killing trillions of drones.
When?Captain Kathryn Janeway led the USS Voyager (staffed mostly by actual and acting SF personnel) to improve on Borg assimilation techniques.
The prior allegiance of that bunch or terrorists is irrelevant.Michael Eddington (a former SF officer) led the Maquis (composed of former SF personnel) to use cobalt diselinide on Cardassian worlds.
An attack Sisko made no attempt to clear with SF CommandCaptain Benjamin Sisko (a SF officer) led the USS Defiant (staffed mostly by SF personnel) to use trilithium resin on a Maquis world and intended to carry on his campaign.
Like the Borg, this was a targeted attack, not an indiscriminate one, and the Founders could be considered as much a single life form as independent ones.Section 31 (composed partly of SF personnel) attempted genocide of the Changeling Species by creating a morphogenic virus.
And Janeway went after him for his crimes. Using this and Sisko's actions to support a theory that the Federation uses genocide as a standard tactic in war are the equivalent of using My Lai as proof that the annihilation of the Vietnamese population was SOP for the US Army in SE Asia.Captain Rudoplh Ransom led the USS Equinox (staffed by SF personnel) in a systematic murder of intelligent nucleogenic beings.
Then why do you claim the Feds only have hundreds of ships, rather than thousands or possibly low tens of thousands?DS9 leaves no room for underestimation with it's fleet actions.
Whereupon you leave the core of the Federation wide open to attack.Fleet 2 is a general reserve to respond to where needed. Against the large powers I envision a savage mauling on their midrange bases to allow the war footing to begin in earnest.
I don't like your complete ignorance of strategy and Star Trek.You don't like my act of plot.The Organians aren't...