The Youtube video thread!

A place to hang out and chat about whatever
User avatar
Nutso
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9662
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 9:58 pm

Re: The Youtube video thread!

Post by Nutso »

"Bible, Wrath of Khan, what's the difference?"
Stan - South Park
RK_Striker_JK_5
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 13026
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Location: New Hampshire
Contact:

Re: The Youtube video thread!

Post by RK_Striker_JK_5 »

User avatar
Nutso
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9662
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 9:58 pm

Re: The Youtube video thread!

Post by Nutso »



:happydevil:
"Bible, Wrath of Khan, what's the difference?"
Stan - South Park
RK_Striker_JK_5
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 13026
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Location: New Hampshire
Contact:

Re: The Youtube video thread!

Post by RK_Striker_JK_5 »

RK_Striker_JK_5
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 13026
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Location: New Hampshire
Contact:

Re: The Youtube video thread!

Post by RK_Striker_JK_5 »

JudgeKing
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 1114
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 5:53 am
Location: Somewhere in the universe

Re: The Youtube video thread!

Post by JudgeKing »

There is not a problem in this world that can't be solved without the proper application of a sufficient number of thermonuclear ordnance.
RK_Striker_JK_5
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 13026
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Location: New Hampshire
Contact:

Re: The Youtube video thread!

Post by RK_Striker_JK_5 »

Bravery doesn't equal bulletproof.
User avatar
Graham Kennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 11561
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
Location: Banbury, UK
Contact:

Re: The Youtube video thread!

Post by Graham Kennedy »

If you're in a tank force, would you really go charging into an infantry force like that? I'm given to understand that tanks are very vulnerable to infantry attack if they are unsupported by infantry of their own. I would have thought they would stop on or just in front of that little ridge and use machine gun fire en masse. Dense infantry formations really do not enjoy running straight at dozens of machine guns.

But I'm no General. :)
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...
RK_Striker_JK_5
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 13026
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Location: New Hampshire
Contact:

Re: The Youtube video thread!

Post by RK_Striker_JK_5 »

I think at about 5:50 of that video is the textbook scenario of, "Oh, crap!"
Coalition
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 1149
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:34 am
Location: Georgia, United States
Contact:

Re: The Youtube video thread!

Post by Coalition »

Graham Kennedy wrote:If you're in a tank force, would you really go charging into an infantry force like that? I'm given to understand that tanks are very vulnerable to infantry attack if they are unsupported by infantry of their own. I would have thought they would stop on or just in front of that little ridge and use machine gun fire en masse. Dense infantry formations really do not enjoy running straight at dozens of machine guns.

But I'm no General. :)
The first force was pursuing a single soldier, and didn't realize the enemy was that close. After they crossed the ridge the flank forces should have turned to the sides and strafed with machine guns, giving the center room to maneuver. Unless the trailing tanks were close enough that the front tanks knew that stopping to turn would lead to a traffic jam. At that point it was pretty much just rush forward and screw up the Japanese formation as much as possible.
The second force at least heard the shots (and saw the smoke) so they knew where the fight was. They came in relatively ready.
Overall, this is why you give your forward scouting formations some recon assets so they can give their bigger buddies a heads up. Perhaps in this case the overall idea was tank shock, where they hit the Japanese force with a strong cluster of tanks, to break formations in case of contact. A smaller Japanese force might have folded quite well, not sure about the size of this Japanese force (it had light field artillery with it). Not to mention no sane commander expects his opponent to have dedicated suicide units.
Relativity Calculator
My Nomination for "MVAM Critic Award" (But can it be broken into 3 separate pieces?)
User avatar
Griffin
Commander
Commander
Posts: 1209
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 7:52 pm
Location: Yorkshire!

Re: The Youtube video thread!

Post by Griffin »

Bite my shiny metal ass
RK_Striker_JK_5
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 13026
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Location: New Hampshire
Contact:

Re: The Youtube video thread!

Post by RK_Striker_JK_5 »

Griffin wrote:
What's scariest about this one to me? The crab seems to know what the knife is for!
JudgeKing
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 1114
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 5:53 am
Location: Somewhere in the universe

Re: The Youtube video thread!

Post by JudgeKing »

Here is Turkish Star Wars.
There is not a problem in this world that can't be solved without the proper application of a sufficient number of thermonuclear ordnance.
Atekimogus
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 1193
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:10 pm
Location: Vienna

Re: The Youtube video thread!

Post by Atekimogus »

Graham Kennedy wrote:If you're in a tank force, would you really go charging into an infantry force like that? I'm given to understand that tanks are very vulnerable to infantry attack if they are unsupported by infantry of their own. I would have thought they would stop on or just in front of that little ridge and use machine gun fire en masse. Dense infantry formations really do not enjoy running straight at dozens of machine guns.

But I'm no General. :)
Well..that clip was rubbish in so many ways. That being said.....I see nothing preventing them from rushing the infantry since all they have are infantry weapons. The guns that are shown in the beginning stop firing or are destroyed, so they have virtually no anti-tank capability left.

Those are supposed to be BT-5 or BT-7 tanks and we talk 1938/39 here. Even those BT tanks should be proof against infantry weapons. (However russian doctrine had them attacking buttomed up and BT tanks didn't have an AAA-MG on the turret-hatch iirc, so that is also rubbish).

So...I would say until the advent of RPGs tanks are not that much in danger from infantry attacks. German tanks suffered greatly in 41/42 from russian anti-tank rifles but even then only at close range. After the introduction of skirts or switching to tanks proof against them infantry again become more or less a non-factor to tanks. (Well....if you are suicidal you can always try getting on tanks, jamming turrets with rebars, throwing molotov-cocktails, planting mines etc. but that is as much a danger to the infantry as it is to the tank.)

Recently read "Tigers in the Mud" from Otto Carius, a german tank ace. Very informative. The order of what is a danger to you seemed to have been: Hidden AT-gun>tanks>artillery>planes>>>>>>>>>>>>>infantry. As for the clip....yeah..you are right. If they'd just stopped at the ridge and opened up........it would have been far more effective. (but less dramatic)

Have you seen "Fury"? Exactly the same. We have tanks rushing each other....never would have happened. All you do rushing an enemy tank in that time is botching the aim of the gunner. But......for a movie that would have been too boring.
I'm Commander Shepard and this is my favorite store on the Citadel.
RK_Striker_JK_5
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 13026
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Location: New Hampshire
Contact:

Re: The Youtube video thread!

Post by RK_Striker_JK_5 »

Yup, 'rule of drama' trumps realism most of the time.
Post Reply