Ship of the week: X-wing starfighter

User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Ship of the week: X-wing starfighter

Post by Deepcrush »

Rochey wrote:IIRC, Saxton theorised that they may be to help with cooling the guns during use in some way. Presumably the ship doesn't need to have them open or closed for anything, it just helps.
To my knowledge the S-foils are there to expand the field of fire, disperse heat and spread out the shield bubble.

From earlier.
SuperSaiyaMan12 wrote:Check out the X-Wing's sucessor. It looks like a cross between a P-38 Lightning and an X-Wing
Four heavy laser cannon and 16 PT warheads...! :shock:

Thats a spicy ship!
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
User avatar
SuperSaiyaMan12
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts: 760
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:41 pm
Location: Auburn
Contact:

Re: Ship of the week: X-wing starfighter

Post by SuperSaiyaMan12 »

Deepcrush wrote:
SuperSaiyaMan12 wrote:Check out the X-Wing's sucessor. It looks like a cross between a P-38 Lightning and an X-Wing
Four heavy laser cannon and 16 PT warheads...! :shock:

Thats a spicy ship!
Check out another of the X-Wing lineage, the CF9 Crossfire Starfighter: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/CF9_Cros ... tarfighter

Image
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Ship of the week: X-wing starfighter

Post by Deepcrush »

This one doesn't really impress me at all.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Nickswitz
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 5:34 pm
Location: Home
Contact:

Re: Ship of the week: X-wing starfighter

Post by Nickswitz »

It looks like someone wanted to put a propeller on it... The first one I like though, I love the P-38, so I like this design as well... :D
The world ended

"Insanity -- a perfectly rational adjustment to an insane world" - R.D.Lang
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Ship of the week: X-wing starfighter

Post by Deepcrush »

With the X-83 (Lightning) around, this ship really is just under powered, under gunned and not needed. IMO
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
User avatar
SuperSaiyaMan12
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts: 760
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:41 pm
Location: Auburn
Contact:

Re: Ship of the week: X-wing starfighter

Post by SuperSaiyaMan12 »

Deepcrush wrote:With the X-83 (Lightning) around, this ship really is just under powered, under gunned and not needed. IMO
Well the X-83 is usually for Jedi and is kind of expensive, and Krayt kind of made production go underground.
User avatar
Reliant121
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 12263
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm

Re: Ship of the week: X-wing starfighter

Post by Reliant121 »

the CF9 looks to large and bulky to be an effective fighter, however, i can see it as a heavy assault fighter. but it all depends on how heavily armed it is.
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Ship of the week: X-wing starfighter

Post by Deepcrush »

SuperSaiyaMan12 wrote:Well the X-83 is usually for Jedi and is kind of expensive, and Krayt kind of made production go underground.
Its not really that much more costly then the X-Wing. Add that to the need for underground production then you not only want but NEED tough fighter.
Reliant121 wrote:the CF9 looks to large and bulky to be an effective fighter, however, i can see it as a heavy assault fighter. but it all depends on how heavily armed it is.
It has the same armament as the X-wing but larger and the forward weapons block line of sight and no aft vision.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
User avatar
Reliant121
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 12263
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm

Re: Ship of the week: X-wing starfighter

Post by Reliant121 »

So the CF9 is not really much of an offensive improvement over the X-wing, is larger and is very difficult to see out of. I have to ask, what is the point?
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Ship of the week: X-wing starfighter

Post by Deepcrush »

Someone wanted something new and it just didn't work out. Much the same as the Pellaeon Class.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
RK_Striker_JK_5
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 13029
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 5:27 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award, Cochrane Medal of Excellence
Location: New Hampshire
Contact:

Re: Ship of the week: X-wing starfighter

Post by RK_Striker_JK_5 »

Why can I imagine the CF9 taking a hard turn in any direction... and that forward monstrosity just ripping right off the front, there?

And my favorite WW II fighter was the P-38, so kudos to the X-83. :) *Checks out link* LOL, and it seems the successors of the GCW-era Incom Corporation are made of the same stuff, as they're manufacturing them in secret and selling them to enemies of Krayt! :happydevil: :mrgreen:
Tyyr
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10654
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh

Re: Ship of the week: X-wing starfighter

Post by Tyyr »

SuperSaiyaMan12 wrote:Check out another of the X-Wing lineage, the CF9 Crossfire Starfighter: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/CF9_Cros ... tarfighter

http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/starw ... -Leg13.jpg
What an abortion. Who saw that and actually thought it was good?
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Ship of the week: X-wing starfighter

Post by Deepcrush »

Tyyr wrote:What an abortion. Who saw that and actually thought it was good?
So far, no one.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Nickswitz
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 5:34 pm
Location: Home
Contact:

Re: Ship of the week: X-wing starfighter

Post by Nickswitz »

Deepcrush wrote:
Tyyr wrote:What an abortion. Who saw that and actually thought it was good?
So far, no one.
Yeah, it looks bad, and that's being nice, it looks like someone tried to put a propeller on a space craft, putting lasers on that pointless propeller and trying to sell it as useful, at all. Yeah, bad idea.
The world ended

"Insanity -- a perfectly rational adjustment to an insane world" - R.D.Lang
Monroe
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 5837
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:17 am

Re: Ship of the week: X-wing starfighter

Post by Monroe »

Going back to the R2 (since I can't check this site on weekends) I guess its just a matter of taste. I would rather not have a little beeping droid following me around. Now if the computer can talk to me and everything fine but I don't want to mess with the droid. Personal choice I guess.
How many Minbari does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
None. They always surrender right before they finish the job and never tell you why.

-Remain Star Trek-
Post Reply