No, why would there be?Deepcrush wrote:The Klingons are at risk of conflict with the Romulans, in a border war with the UFP, in a rather open war with the Cardassians. Why would their ENTIRE FLEET be at DS9?
By jove! It took you a full page before you started throwing insults, you must be weakening!Deepcrush wrote:I take it thinking doesn't take part in your thought process... yes that's a pun...
If you say 'entire war effort' then part of that ENTIRE line will include their entire fleet as the word entire means all, everything, fully disposed... etc etc...
That was a pun, not an insult. Though the "get civilized" doesn't help you at all if you're trying to avoid getting slapped around. Though if you'd like I could start insulting you for every foul you make while you're here. I don't mind, really.SolkaTruesilver wrote:By jove! It took you a full page before you started throwing insults, you must be weakening!
All right, out you go. Start talking again when you get civilized.
The destruction of Bajor's sun would have most likely collapsed the entrance on the AQ side. The Dominion couldn't take possession of anything unless they committed to a 70 year trek in normal warp from the GQ.So, people. DS9 is destroyed, so is Bajor. Do you think the Dominion would have risked going all-out immediately, or still have waited to make diplomatic inroads? On one hand, the totality of the Romulan and the Federation's fleet aren't mobilised yet. On the other hand, so isn't the Dominion, and there is nothing preventing them from sending more and more.
Hmmm.. maybe the Dominion would have taken possession of our end of the Worm Hole?
I am not interested in discussing in your rationalisation for you verbally abusing members of this forum. I won't let you do it to me, so please don't bother answering to my posts if you can't keep your offensive tongue to yourself. Such posts are simply going to be ignored.Deepcrush wrote:That was a pun, not an insult. Though the "get civilized" doesn't help you at all if you're trying to avoid getting slapped around. Though if you'd like I could start insulting you for every foul you make while you're here. I don't mind, really.SolkaTruesilver wrote:By jove! It took you a full page before you started throwing insults, you must be weakening!
All right, out you go. Start talking again when you get civilized.
Whether or not someone's using the Queen's English or effing and blinding at you has no bearing whatsoever on the validity of their argument or opinion. This has been explained to you before by Sionnach. If you decide to ignore Deep's points because he's swearing at you, that's your prerogative, but Deep is well within his rights to consider such a refusal to continue the debate as you conceding said points.SolkaTruesilver wrote:I am not interested in discussing in your rationalisation for you verbally abusing members of this forum. I won't let you do it to me, so please don't bother answering to my posts if you can't keep your offensive tongue to yourself. Such posts are simply going to be ignored.
One third would be absurdly high, simply because one third is the number of ships usually available to be on station anywhere - the usual rule of thumb being 1/3 on station, 1/3 working up and 1/3 in refit.stitch626 wrote:One point, Deep. They could not have their entire fleet be in the war zone, simply because some ships are in transit, while others are defending (it would be really bad to win the war, but lose your home). So a third could easily have been the entire war effort against the Cardies, cause they would have other concerns.
I was just picking a random number less than 1/2.Captain Seafort wrote:One third would be absurdly high, simply because one third is the number of ships usually available to be on station anywhere - the usual rule of thumb being 1/3 on station, 1/3 working up and 1/3 in refit.stitch626 wrote:One point, Deep. They could not have their entire fleet be in the war zone, simply because some ships are in transit, while others are defending (it would be really bad to win the war, but lose your home). So a third could easily have been the entire war effort against the Cardies, cause they would have other concerns.
Thats what I was pointing out.stitch626 wrote:One point, Deep. They could not have their entire fleet be in the war zone, simply because some ships are in transit, while others are defending (it would be really bad to win the war, but lose your home). So a third could easily have been the entire war effort against the Cardies, cause they would have other concerns.
