Perhaps it should be...Teaos wrote:That statement isnt said very often.I think Roddenberry got it right
I suppose you got wind of my attitude by now...
Perhaps it should be...Teaos wrote:That statement isnt said very often.I think Roddenberry got it right
You should look out for some more. The effects are cheesey as hell compared to other series, but the plots and characters were excelent.I've never actually seen TOS except for maybe a few random episodes here and there
To an extent it is the be-all and end-all. Without TOS there would be Trek.Lt. Staplic wrote:That's what i thought, based on the show's i'd seen, but everyone here's been talking about it like it was the end-all, be-all of the ST franchise so i thought maybe i'd missed something.
Honestly, I think it's so incredibly campy and dated that I have trouble appreciating the so-called "IQ" I appreciate the thoughts behind it and certainly the messages, but they were so blatantly obvious that they lost their charm many times. There were a lot of amazing episodes, but there never seemed to be a middle ground. If it wasn't great, it was absolute trash.Deepcrush wrote:You're really missing out. TOS was Trek with IQ. Though they gained some of it back with DS9, it just wasn't the same.