Ship nits on main site

Discuss the site here - suggestions, comments, complaints, etc.

Re: Ship nits on main site

Postby Tsukiyumi » Sun Aug 31, 2008 6:45 pm

Found a new hobby, Stitch? :lol:
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
 
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 1:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!

Re: Ship nits on main site

Postby stitch626 » Sun Aug 31, 2008 6:46 pm

Yep. I'm bored and am procrastinating on my homework.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
 
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY

Re: Ship nits on main site

Postby Tsukiyumi » Sun Aug 31, 2008 6:48 pm

Tsk, tsk. No need for that, unless it's absurdly boring to you, and/or something you don't need to know.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
 
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 1:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!

Re: Ship nits on main site

Postby stitch626 » Sun Aug 31, 2008 6:57 pm

4 x 2nd class photon torpedo tube with 120 rounds

The 4 is yellow. This is for the E-A. From what I remember, the E-A had only two torpedo launchers. Feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
 
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY

Re: Ship nits on main site

Postby stitch626 » Sun Aug 31, 2008 7:25 pm

You have this in the specs for the type 7 shuttle:
Armament : , total output 200 TeraWatts

Don't know what is missing.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
 
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY

Re: Ship nits on main site

Postby stitch626 » Sun Aug 31, 2008 7:34 pm

You give this as the armament of the type 10 shuttle:
2 x Type IV phaser bank

yet we can see two arrays on the nacelles.


BTW, I don't mean any disrespect by going on this mad nit finding binge, I just needed something to do, and the forum isn't active much this weekend.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
 
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY

Re: Ship nits on main site

Postby stitch626 » Sun Aug 31, 2008 7:47 pm

You give the Travel pod this performance
Impulse only : Max Impulse Speed : 0.01 x c
Atmospheric Cruise (Mach) : 2
Atmospheric Max (Mach) : 4

I would think that the travel pod would be sub-impulse, since it only had thrusters, which you later state.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
 
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY

Re: Ship nits on main site

Postby IanKennedy » Sun Aug 31, 2008 7:48 pm

stitch626 wrote:In the Scimitar notes section, many paragraphs have this at the end
#2009}

I have no idea what it means. :?

Ah, that's a reference without correct formatting. References look like {this is the text you see.#number} where #number tells the system what reference to use. I've just fixed those issues, and as you can see the #2009} is gone and those paragraphs are yellow and referenced to Star Trek : Nemesis, which is reference #2009.

Please ignore the man behind the curtain :)
email, ergo spam
User avatar
IanKennedy
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 5291
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 1:28 pm
Location: Oxford, UK

Re: Ship nits on main site

Postby stitch626 » Sun Aug 31, 2008 8:02 pm

In the Galor pictures section, the picture with this text:
A Galor taking a beating from Klingon ships. The ship was destroyed moments later.

is a Keldon, not a Galor.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
 
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY

Re: Ship nits on main site

Postby Captain Seafort » Sun Aug 31, 2008 8:04 pm

It's also not being attacked by Klingons - it's being hit by the Defiant's pulse phasers.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
 
Posts: 15478
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 12:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: Ship nits on main site

Postby stitch626 » Sun Aug 31, 2008 8:21 pm

On the Dominion Attack Ship pictures page, the picture with this text
Another dorsal view, highlighting the nacelles.

is actually of the ventral view.

And this one
A view of the rear ventral surface.

is of the dorsal surface.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
 
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY

Re: Ship nits on main site

Postby Mark » Fri Sep 05, 2008 12:26 am

I noticed that in the Constellation starship section, the USS Hathaway is listed as destroyed in Peak Performance. I don't remember the ship being destroyed. Are you sure about that one???
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
 
Posts: 17671
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:49 pm
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: Ship nits on main site

Postby stitch626 » Fri Sep 05, 2008 1:17 am

I believe your right Mark. I can't believe I missed that.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
 
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY

Re: Ship nits on main site

Postby KuvahMagh » Sun Sep 07, 2008 5:41 pm

Further with the Constellation page, you list the length as 231m and your Reference seems to be taken from the Encyclopedia which you scaled it from. You then say that non-Canon sources give a size of 315m. However we do have a Cannon reference to the size of the ship from "The Battle" when the E-D is towing Stargazer, in fact you have the pic in the Constellation pictures page. In the picture the Constellation appears much closer to the E-D in terms of size than the Information listed under size would suggest and when you look at the Size Comparison page between the Galaxy and Constellation it appears very different to what was seen on screen.

As to the Hathaway I think they destroyed it in the end to get rid of the Ferengi or some such.
There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must never be a time when we fail to protest.
-Elie Wiesel

Dreaming in Color Living in Black and White, Sitting in a Grey Day Leaning on a Bright New Tomorrow.
-Billy Ray Cyrus
User avatar
KuvahMagh
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
 
Posts: 856
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:30 am
Location: Canada

Re: Ship nits on main site

Postby Captain Seafort » Sun Sep 07, 2008 5:47 pm

KuvahMagh wrote:As to the Hathaway I think they destroyed it in the end to get rid of the Ferengi or some such.


No they didn't - they used a Picard Manoeuvre-esque trick to fool the Ferengi into thinking the Hathaway had been destroyed, by detonating a torpedo right in front of it while the ship made a short-range warp jump behind a nearby planet. From the Ferengi's persepective it appeared that that the ship had been destroyed.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
 
Posts: 15478
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 12:44 pm
Location: Blighty

PreviousNext

Return to DITL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron