The Enterprise-D Size Question: was the TNG Enterprise too big?

The Next Generation
Post Reply
User avatar
Nutso
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9637
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 9:58 pm

The Enterprise-D Size Question: was the TNG Enterprise too big?

Post by Nutso »

"Bible, Wrath of Khan, what's the difference?"
Stan - South Park
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6244
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: The Enterprise-D Size Question: was the TNG Enterprise too big?

Post by McAvoy »

Yes. For a crew that size and even taking in account for the size of the rooms, the ship is just huge.

Figure damage control. A ship this large would either mean during combat situations, either the crew is spaced out or concentrated in certain areas. So if a energy impact hit a certain part of the hull, perhaps a phaser relay energy thingie in the saucer, it might take valuable time for a repair crew to get to it.

Or think simple shifts. 8-12 hour shifts. 1,000 crew but not all Starfleet. Let's assume it's 750 crew members. That means 3 8 hour 250 crew shifts, or 2 12 hour 375 crew shifts. That's not alot of people to oversee a ship of this size during normal day to day operations.

Honestly, TNG could have tripled the crew to 3,000 and it would not have made a difference on the show, and it would have worked a bit better.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
bladela
Lieutenant jg
Lieutenant jg
Posts: 270
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2018 8:36 am

Re: The Enterprise-D Size Question: was the TNG Enterprise too big?

Post by bladela »

we could simply say the galaxy class does have a lot more automation that we would expect
"in casa dal 4 marzo, come sono felice"
"at home since March 4th, how happy I am"
Post Reply