The Enterprise-D Size Question: was the TNG Enterprise too big?

The Next Generation
Post Reply
User avatar
Nutso
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9736
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 9:58 pm

The Enterprise-D Size Question: was the TNG Enterprise too big?

Post by Nutso »

"Bible, Wrath of Khan, what's the difference?"
Stan - South Park
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6300
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: The Enterprise-D Size Question: was the TNG Enterprise too big?

Post by McAvoy »

Yes. For a crew that size and even taking in account for the size of the rooms, the ship is just huge.

Figure damage control. A ship this large would either mean during combat situations, either the crew is spaced out or concentrated in certain areas. So if a energy impact hit a certain part of the hull, perhaps a phaser relay energy thingie in the saucer, it might take valuable time for a repair crew to get to it.

Or think simple shifts. 8-12 hour shifts. 1,000 crew but not all Starfleet. Let's assume it's 750 crew members. That means 3 8 hour 250 crew shifts, or 2 12 hour 375 crew shifts. That's not alot of people to oversee a ship of this size during normal day to day operations.

Honestly, TNG could have tripled the crew to 3,000 and it would not have made a difference on the show, and it would have worked a bit better.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
bladela
Lieutenant jg
Lieutenant jg
Posts: 272
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2018 8:36 am

Re: The Enterprise-D Size Question: was the TNG Enterprise too big?

Post by bladela »

we could simply say the galaxy class does have a lot more automation that we would expect
"in casa dal 4 marzo, come sono felice"
"at home since March 4th, how happy I am"
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6300
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: The Enterprise-D Size Question: was the TNG Enterprise too big?

Post by McAvoy »

bladela wrote: Mon Mar 25, 2024 10:51 am we could simply say the galaxy class does have a lot more automation that we would expect
There is that. Does seem like there is alot of computer control.

There could be unseen droids that would do constant rounds like a rooba that had a love child with R2D2 that runs up and down the Jeffries Tubes.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
bladela
Lieutenant jg
Lieutenant jg
Posts: 272
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2018 8:36 am

Re: The Enterprise-D Size Question: was the TNG Enterprise too big?

Post by bladela »

Actually that kind of droids are canon since DIS and SNW, so they were fielded a century before the D.
"in casa dal 4 marzo, come sono felice"
"at home since March 4th, how happy I am"
User avatar
McAvoy
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6300
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:39 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: The Enterprise-D Size Question: was the TNG Enterprise too big?

Post by McAvoy »

bladela wrote: Mon Sep 02, 2024 8:03 pm Actually that kind of droids are canon since DIS and SNW, so they were fielded a century before the D.
Yes. That never bothered me when I saw that. Makes sense to me.

In the end, the Galaxy class is huge. Gigantic. Like the circumference of the saucer is 2.4 kilometers or 1.5 miles.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
Post Reply